[jet]

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/so...s-photos-news/

45 Photos of Prince Louis's Sweetest Moments

The youngest Cambridge kid is one cute royal.
…………………..
Little Louis has become quite the superstar, apparently he’s ‘trending’ all over the place with people doting on him.

[The Slim Reaper]

Find it a bit weird that 45 pictures of a young boy is an article if I'm honest.

[jet]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Find it a bit weird that 45 pictures of a young boy is an article if I'm honest.

You do? Why?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Yeah, it's not weird to write the article, it's weird to point out the weirdness....Ok Parmy.

Explain the bit in bold

There is nothing weird about an article that has pictures of the youngest child of the future king and queen.

It shows him as a new born and shows him growing up,

[Crimson Dynamo]

[arista]

[arista]

Yes, move to this Bigger Bedfordshire Royal Home.

[Swan]

The press are fast becoming obsessed with these royal kids, it's nothing new i know, i remember Harry and Will in the papers every other day as kids. We'll see how it affects them over the years i guess. But they need to be prepped for life on the front cover for many years to come.

I will never understand our royal obsession, but the next gen of royals and the press' relationship with them is in full swing now.

[arista]

Spoiler:

Large Image

Thats the Spirit, Lad

[arista]

Yes Lad
Painting is fun

[jet]

Originally Posted by arista

Spoiler:

Yes Lad
Painting is fun

Love this pic of little Louis. He's a hoot.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Spoiler:

[user104658]

I think poor Louis is unfortunately destined to be the next Harry. His antics will be cute and fun until he hits his 20’s (let’s not forget that the press LOVED rogue Prince Harry not too long ago) and then he’ll be thrown on the heap alongside his uncle for “not being royal enough” and spend the rest of his days being unfavourably compared to his big brother.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I think poor Louis is unfortunately destined to be the next Harry. His antics will be cute and fun until he hits his 20’s (let’s not forget that the press LOVED rogue Prince Harry not too long ago) and then he’ll be thrown on the heap alongside his uncle for “not being royal enough” and spend the rest of his days being unfavourably compared to his big brother.

Very true .. in fact all Harry has done to lose favour is to grow up , stop acting stupid and getting drunk ... and fall in love ...
Now he’s routinely mocked or hated

Crazy times


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Very true .. in fact all Harry has done to lose favour is to grow up , stop acting stupid and getting drunk ... and fall in love ...
Now he’s routinely mocked or hated

Crazy times


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In fact 'All' Harry has done to lose favour is trash his family on a tacky American Talk show...allow his wife to do the same....moan about being 'financially cut off' at the age of 37 when he already has millions in the bank.

I see no evidence of 'growing up'...nor failing to act stupid

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

In fact 'All' Harry has done to lose favour is trash his family on a tacky American Talk show...allow his wife to do the same....moan about being 'financially cut off' at the age of 37 when he already has millions in the bank.

I see no evidence of 'growing up'...nor failing to act stupid

Growing up as in ‘getting older’ .

As to the trash talk .. he was simply defending his wife . Remember we have no idea what really went on or what was really said or insinuated .... but .. the Royal family have a lousy track record on .. . just about everything so I’m on Harry’s side for this .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Growing up as in ‘getting older’ .

As to the trash talk .. he was simply defending his wife . Remember we have no idea what really went on or what was really said or insinuated ....

if only they had a huge worldwide interview where they could have specifically said this


oh wait they did and they did not

[jet]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Growing up as in ‘getting older’ .

As to the trash talk .. he was simply defending his wife . Remember we have no idea what really went on or what was really said or insinuated .... but .. the Royal family have a lousy track record on .. . just about everything so I’m on Harry’s side for this .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It has since been proven that a lot of lies were told by them during that interview. Do your research.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Growing up as in ‘getting older’ .

As to the trash talk .. he was simply defending his wife . Remember we have no idea what really went on or what was really said or insinuated .... but .. the Royal family have a lousy track record on .. . just about everything so I’m on Harry’s side for this .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

By defending his wife...he lied through his teeth. If you TRULY believe that in his position and an Ambassador for Mental Health he could not help his wife when she was 'suicidal' then I think you must be very naive.
He allowed his wife to trash his family and allow her to misconvey facts he knew were not true...

[jet]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Growing up as in ‘getting older’ .

As to the trash talk .. he was simply defending his wife . Remember we have no idea what really went on or what was really said or insinuated .... but .. the Royal family have a lousy track record on .. . just about everything so I’m on Harry’s side for this .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We know plenty about what was said. This is Harry, who allowed his wife to accuse the Royal family of racism…..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7822883.stm

Prince Harry's racist remark about a Pakistani member of his army platoon has prompted widespread criticism.

The prince issued an apology after the News of the World published a video diary in which he calls one of his then Sandhurst colleagues a "P***"....

…..The prince filmed parts of the video and in another clip, he is heard calling another cadet a "raghead"....

Mohammed Shafiq, director of Muslim youth organisation the Ramadhan Foundation said: "I am deeply shocked and saddened at Prince Harry's racism. It has no justification.
"Prince Harry as a public figure must ensure that he promotes equality and tolerance and this rant whether today or three years ago is sickening and he should be thoroughly ashamed of himself."

Graham Smith from Republic, the campaign for an elected head of state said: "Harry Wales has not only demonstrated how he is unfit to be a possible future Head of State, he has shown he isn't even fit to be a leader in the armed forces."
"It is high time Harry was stripped of his title and privileges and withdrew from public life."

Has anyone ever heard of a racist comment from The Queen, William, Kate, Charles, Camilla, Edward, Sophie etc? Nope.

[Jordan.]

Digging up Harry's past only shows how much he's grown as a person unlike other Royals...

[Crimson Dynamo]

Harry fell off his POlo Horse yesterday

#karma
#manofthepeople

[user104658]

Honestly what is there to condemn in someone who has done something in the past that they now condemn themselves? Not much point in that really, is there. Not a fan of the modern world's tendency to offer no road to redemption - why bother working to better yourself if you're always going to be judged on your worst day, even if it was decades ago? And frankly... I'm very suspicious of ANYONE who says they would happily be judged on their worst day. If you took a snippet of anyone's life on that day and showed a video of it ... I reckon everyone looks like an absolute monster.

So yeah it doesn't matter that much if they've both engaged with hunting for sport in the past - if they regret it and don't take part now, that's all that matters. In fact, someone who used to do something turning round and condemning it actually means more than a layperson doing it, in my opinion.

People like to look at self-reflection and positive change and call it "hypocrisy", which is obviously nonsense. It's only hypocrisy to condemn something that you STILL engage with (or benefit from) or if you don't acknowledge your past deeds.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Honestly what is there to condemn in someone who has done something in the past that they now condemn themselves? Not much point in that really, is there. Not a fan of the modern world's tendency to offer no road to redemption - why bother working to better yourself if you're always going to be judged on your worst day, even if it was decades ago? And frankly... I'm very suspicious of ANYONE who says they would happily be judged on their worst day. If you took a snippet of anyone's life on that day and showed a video of it ... I reckon everyone looks like an absolute monster.

So yeah it doesn't matter that much if they've both engaged with hunting for sport in the past - if they regret it and don't take part now, that's all that matters. In fact, someone who used to do something turning round and condemning it actually means more than a layperson doing it, in my opinion.

People like to look at self-reflection and positive change and call it "hypocrisy", which is obviously nonsense. It's only hypocrisy to condemn something that you STILL engage with (or benefit from) or if you don't acknowledge your past deeds.

Harry just dont use a gun anymore, he will still happily inflict pain and distress on 3 horses for one game of polo though.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Harry just dont use a gun anymore, he will still happily inflict pain and distress on 3 horses for one game of polo though.

9 years in the horse racing industry left me firmly believing that animals simply shouldn't be used in sport at all. Jockies are CONSTANTLY being fined for excessive use of the whip, they just accept it as part of the sport.