[bots]

Originally Posted by Ammi

…I mean, this is real life…this is the President of the US….all countries are not equal in how effective autism is diagnosed there…it’s not that it exists less, more that the diagnosis is less…

…many pregnant women don’t take any medications at all while pregnant and yet autism is on the rise…?…/…the logic being because it’s able to be diagnosed more and more…it does feel like another control step, though…the President of the US…(…not medically trained people…)…will decide what a woman can safely take when she’s pregnant…

This is the same man that recommended people inject themselves with disinfectant to fight covid. Are peoples memories really that bad?

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bots

This is the same man that recommended people inject themselves with disinfectant to fight covid. Are peoples memories really that bad?

…yeah, the bleach recommendation was also what I was thinking yesterday when I heard his words…as I say, it’s kind of laughable but it’s not because this is actually real life and he has such a Messiah/God complex that surely has the medical profession screaming in frustration at his words…

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bots

This is the same man that recommended people inject themselves with disinfectant to fight covid. Are peoples memories really that bad?

…I mean, the response to that I’m sad to say is that…yes, memories are that short because we’re also looking at Nigel Farage leading the UK in the up and coming…the man who lied the voting into Brexit with promises of a better NHS with more funding…but I digress, obviously….but yes, in response to what you say…mass memories and minds can be led on a day to day basis, sadly….

[Maru]

Originally Posted by bots

This is the same man that recommended people inject themselves with disinfectant to fight covid. Are peoples memories really that bad?

I can't speak for others, but he says so many different things at one time that have random meaning that I tend to just turn off any content where he is talking extensively. I can only endure so much.

Trump is like listening to a verbal circus on wheels but then there are all these minor players that try to keep up with him also. Example: One can find one small part to fixate on when listening to a rally for facts, for example, but then he will move on quickly to something else and it is very easy to get lost in the depths of each claim. After a while it discredits itself as being of any worth listening to.

It's never just one single claim to focus on for a week or so. I think that is by design. The media is too easily rattled by their own inability to correct individual things quickly enough. So much so other priorities start to take over and there is no longer any heirarchy to anything that gets said. So it gets harder to follow and news gets buried this way because there is always a new claim.

As a viewer it's not just monitoring Trump's behavior and speech but then a rabid media also. It's a full time job if you really want to research everything properly.

Btw, Snopes has that claim as mostly false when I looked up a version of a quote. Not that it matters, as so many things get said.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Maru

I can't speak for others, but he says so many different things at one time that have random meaning that I tend to just turn off any content where he is talking extensively. I can only endure so much.

Trump is like listening to a verbal circus on wheels but then there are all these minor players that try to keep up with him also. Example: One can find one small part to fixate on when listening to a rally for facts, for example, but then he will move on quickly to something else and it is very easy to get lost in the depths of each claim. After a while it discredits itself as being of any worth listening to.

It's never just one single claim to focus on for a week or so. I think that is by design. The media is too easily rattled by their own inability to correct individual things quickly enough. So much so other priorities start to take over and there is no longer any heirarchy to anything that gets said. So it gets harder to follow and news gets buried this way because there is always a new claim.

As a viewer it's not just monitoring Trump's behavior and speech but then a rabid media also. It's a full time job if you really want to research everything properly.

Btw, Snopes has that claim as mostly false when I looked up a version of a quote. Not that it matters, as so many things get said.

yes, the dumping of lots of different things on multiple fronts is the trump playbook and it works like a charm every time

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Maru

I can't speak for others, but he says so many different things at one time that have random meaning that I tend to just turn off any content where he is talking extensively. I can only endure so much.

Trump is like listening to a verbal circus on wheels but then there are all these minor players that try to keep up with him also. Example: One can find one small part to fixate on when listening to a rally for facts, for example, but then he will move on quickly to something else and it is very easy to get lost in the depths of each claim. After a while it discredits itself as being of any worth listening to.

It's never just one single claim to focus on for a week or so. I think that is by design. The media is too easily rattled by their own inability to correct individual things quickly enough. So much so other priorities start to take over and there is no longer any heirarchy to anything that gets said. So it gets harder to follow and news gets buried this way because there is always a new claim.

As a viewer it's not just monitoring Trump's behavior and speech but then a rabid media also. It's a full time job if you really want to research everything properly.

Btw, Snopes has that claim as mostly false when I looked up a version of a quote. Not that it matters, as so many things get said.

Did you vote for this idiot 3 times?

[MTVN]

Well you never know Trump may be right, the links between the two seem inconclusive rather than nonexistent. We normally take an extremely precautionary approach with things like alcohol so why not with drugs too. Some times it's good to challenge the consensus of pharma companies - I think pills of all kinds are far too widely distributed in most of the West but the US has a particular problem with it

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Well you never know Trump may be right, the links between the two seem inconclusive rather than nonexistent. We normally take an extremely precautionary approach with things like alcohol so why not with drugs too. Some times it's good to challenge the consensus of pharma companies - I think pills of all kinds are far too widely distributed in most of the West but the US has a particular problem with it

Come on. If the US actually wanted to deal with it's over prescribing of medicines it would ban drug advertisements on TV, but they won't do that, of course, because profits. This is pure RFK ideology.

[joeysteele]

Sorry but to me he's stark raving bonkers more likely.
Although I'd add, probably dangerously so.

[emseateng2014]

even on abc the view they said listen to your doctor and not rfk jr

rfk jr is like the 1st republican kennedy in the kennedy family since arnold aka the terminator even thought arnold was a member of the kennedys through marriage but still was one of them

[Alf]

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by Alf

Trump’s statement was stupid and dangerous without any real evidence. But people going on social media showing themselves take it is equally stupid and dangerous as some who prob don’t take it will likely watch, copy and do themselves some harm

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Benjamin

Trump’s statement was stupid and dangerous without any real evidence. But people going on social media showing themselves take it is equally stupid and dangerous as some who prob don’t take it will likely watch, copy and do themselves some harm

Who said Trump didn't have any real evidence?

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by Alf

Who said Trump didn't have any real evidence?

If you’d like to bring that evidence here if he had some.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Benjamin

If you’d like to bring that evidence here if he had some.

Why would I be in possession of the evidence? Your answer doesn't even make any sense to the question I asked you.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Alf

Who said Trump didn't have any real evidence?

any sane person who watched his press conference

[Maru]

Youtube video

[Alf]

This is an interesting tweet from Tylenol themselves back in 2017.

[Alf]

Trump derangement syndrome (TDS) is dangerous.

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by Alf

Trump derangement syndrome (TDS) is dangerous.

Not going to respond to my question?

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Benjamin

Not going to respond to my question?

To be honest, it was a stupid question.

It's a question I'm in no position to have the answer for.

I could take an opinionated guess for you and say that in my experience, Trump usually ends up being correct in the end.

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by Alf

To be honest, it was a stupid question.

It's a question I'm in no position to have the answer for.

I could take an opinionated guess for you and say that in my experience, Trump usually ends up being correct in the end.

I asked if you believe he has evidence. Not a stupid question at all. You just don’t like it. And of course you can’t provide evidence as neither can Trump, so I’ll just move on from your trolling posts.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Benjamin

I asked if you believe he has evidence. Not a stupid question at all. You just don’t like it. And of course you can’t provide evidence as neither can Trump, so I’ll just move on from your trolling posts.

Shut up you tart.

[Glenn.]

Trumps derangement is dangerous

[Glenn.]

Did you provide him with fact? MAGA doesn’t like that.