[arista]

The Demo Mob has now gone outside the Conservative Building

[ange7]

Originally Posted by arista

Thatcher did the Ground Work
for Evil Warmonger New Labour Blair.

lol... makes no sense.

[arista]

Originally Posted by ange7

nah if gordon quits then clegg has to except ANY deal that the cons give him for his 50 or so seats. With the pm still in the race clegg has more bargaining power to get 2 or 3 ministries out of the cons. This will make governing impossible and lead to another election soon. Gorgon is looking at the big picture. hehe

He will have to Resign as the Conservative -LibDem Talks have gone well.


Its good that Stinking New Labour
will soon be Dead.

[Angus]

Sky news Now
News Alert - Lib Dem Statement shortly

[arista]

Originally Posted by ange7

lol... makes no sense.

The Illegal Invasion Of Iraq was set up by New Labour
and Evil GWBush.

[ange7]

Originally Posted by arista

He will have to Resign as the Conservative -LibDem Talks have gone well.


Its good that Stinking New Labour
will soon be Dead.

thanks Dr spamalot
want to talk on the detail in my post for a change?

[ange7]

Originally Posted by arista

The Illegal Invasion Of Iraq was set up by New Labour
and Evil GWBush.

Conservatives voted for it :P shhhhnaps!

[arista]

Originally Posted by angus58

Sky news Now
News Alert - Lib Dem Statement shortly

Yes LibDem David Laws confirmed Talks going well.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by angus58

I would prefer Conservatives to form a minority government since they won the most seats - and for Gordon Brown to be clinging onto power is despicable. However, if Cameron is forced to deal with Clegg because otherwise Clegg is too unprincipled not to do a deal with Labour just to get his foot in the door, then I can cope with a Con/Libdem alliance. Having said that, if the Con/Libdem coalition is a non starter, even the labour and libdem votes put together doesn't give them a majority, so at least two other parties would need to be on board to give an overall majority. In that case I would prefer to see another General Election as soon as possible.

Thems the rules though, because no majority was reached, the standing PM can stay in power until the minority winning party can gain enough support to claim a majority, through brokering deals etc, a vote of no confidence in the house itself, or he decides his position is untenable and steps down.


Loved the interview on Sky with the two girls who said David Cameron shouldnt get into number 10 because 63% of the vote was against him.... Derrrrrr, doesnt that arguement then extend itself to the Lib Dems in that 77% voted against them.

One quote from them was if we had proportional representation we wouldnt have a hung parliament again, errr if we go PR this sort of power brokering and meetings behind closed doors will be the future of british Politics.Think they just liked the words Proportional representation without knowing the meaning. Dullards.

[Sticks]

According to the constitution, Mr Clegg should be talking to Mr Brown first as he is the sitting Prime Minister, not the pretender.

The sitting Prime Minister has the first attempt at trying to form a government, so Mr Clegg should have been talking to Mr Brown first. The fact the conservatives got the most seats is irrelevant, that is the constitution of this country whether you like it or not.

You tamper with the constitution at your peril.

[arista]

Originally Posted by ange7

Conservatives voted for it :P shhhhnaps!

So What Blair told UnTruths
he is a WarCriminal.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by ange7

google thatcher :P

Did you live here under Thatcher? Do you understand why she introduced the policies she did?

Or are you just bored and wanted to get in a bit of practice with your wooden spoon?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Sticks

According to the constitution, Mr Clegg should be talking to Mr Brown first as he is the sitting Prime Minister, not the pretender.

The sitting Prime Minister has the first attempt at trying to form a government, so Mr Clegg should have been talking to Mr Brown first. The fact the conservatives got the most seats is irrelevant, that is the constitution of this country whether you like it or not.

You tamper with the constitution at your peril.

STICKS
you are Wrong
as Brown Permitted Cameron -Clegg to go ahead first.


So Tough Titty.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by ange7

Conservatives voted for it :P shhhhnaps!

Yes because Blair, Brown and their criminal sidekicks lied to them and to the public about the WMD - have you not been following the Chilcot Enquiry at all?

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by Sticks

According to the constitution, Mr Clegg should be talking to Mr Brown first as he is the sitting Prime Minister, not the pretender.

The sitting Prime Minister has the first attempt at trying to form a government, so Mr Clegg should have been talking to Mr Brown first. The fact the conservatives got the most seats is irrelevant, that is the constitution of this country whether you like it or not.

You tamper with the constitution at your peril.

Errr no he shouldnt, a lib lab coalition still wouldnt reach a majority, therefore the actual election winner and him were right to approach each other. There is no requirement to approach the sitting PM in order to support them. Political alliances are generally made through two sides having closer policies.

[Harry!]

Originally Posted by arista

STICKS
you are Wrong
as Brown Permitted Cameron -Clegg to go ahead first.


So Tough Titty.

lol. That is sig worthy!

[ange7]

Originally Posted by angus58

Yes because Blair, Brown and their criminal sidekicks lied to them and to the public about the WMD - have you not been following the Chilcot Enquiry at all?

awwww the bad labour men lied. lol the cons would bent over for Bush too. Utter fact :P

[arista]

Originally Posted by ange7

awwww the bad labour men lied. lol the cons would bent over for Bush too. Utter fact :P

We can Never know that.




Its Corrupt History now.


Stinking New Labour are Corrupt

[Angus]

Originally Posted by ange7

awwww the bad labour men lied. lol the cons would bent over for Bush too. Utter fact :P

Thought so, another windup merchant with no evidence to back up any ridiculous statement made.

[ange7]

Originally Posted by Sticks

According to the constitution, Mr Clegg should be talking to Mr Brown first as he is the sitting Prime Minister, not the pretender.

The sitting Prime Minister has the first attempt at trying to form a government, so Mr Clegg should have been talking to Mr Brown first. The fact the conservatives got the most seats is irrelevant, that is the constitution of this country whether you like it or not.

You tamper with the constitution at your peril.

yeah I said this yesterday but I think he new he had a poor chance of winning over all the independents etc .... and even if he did it'd be a pretty tenuous coalition to keep together. New election in 12 months I say. Bump Brown and Labor can take those posh nosh eaters.

[Sticks]

Originally Posted by arista

STICKS
you are Wrong
as Brown Permitted Cameron -Clegg to go ahead first.


So Tough Titty.

Then constitutionally Brown is in the wrong as well.

Mr Brown is duty bound by the constitution to see if he can form a government first, if not then he must go to the Queen and resign so she can invite the leader of the opposition to the palace to form a government. That is the constitution. Mr Brown saying he was giving Cameron and Clegg a chance to see if they can come to an accommodation is a dereliction of duty under of our constitution.

As sitting prime minister he should be trying to form a government first or resign.

[ange7]

Originally Posted by angus58

Thought so, another windup merchant with no evidence to back up any ridiculous statement made.

I've made more points in the last 2 days than you have in 12 months troll boy.
You disagree than that the cons voted for the war in Iraq?. That will be a quick debate. Maybe in all this trolling your trying to say that the cons see their relationship with the US as LESS important than that which they have with the UK and so WOULD NOT have bent over backwards for Bush had they been in power? Good luck with that argument too. Dude exactly what are you struggling to say?. (Take a deep breath before typing.) :P

[arista]

Originally Posted by ange7

yeah I said this yesterday but I think he new he had a poor chance of winning over all the independents etc .... and even if he did it'd be a pretty tenuous coalition to keep together. New election in 12 months I say. Bump Brown and Labor can take those posh nosh eaters.

Its all Over Now
as the LibDems person David Laws Confirmed
Talks are going well with the Conservative -LibDem Deal



The Caretaker Unelected PM has gone up to Scotland.

He will soon Stand Down


Utter Bliss.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by ange7

I've made more points in the last 2 days than you have in 12 months troll boy.
You disagree than that the cons voted for the war in Iraq?. That will be a quick debate. Maybe in all this trolling your trying to say that the cons see their relationship with the US as LESS important than that which they have with the UK and so WOULD NOT have bent over backwards for Bush had they been in power? Good luck with that argument too. Dude exactly what are you struggling to say?. (Take a deep breath before typing.) :P

Troll, trolling?

Look in the mirror, my antipodean friend.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Sticks

Then constitutionally Brown is in the wrong as well.

Mr Brown is duty bound by the constitution to see if he can form a government first, if not then he must go to the Queen and resign so she can invite the leader of the opposition to the palace to form a government. That is the constitution. Mr Brown saying he was giving Cameron and Clegg a chance to see if they can come to an accommodation is a dereliction of duty under of our constitution.

As sitting prime minister he should be trying to form a government first or resign.

But Brown changed the Rules.
His Duty is to Care Take.


He will go to the Queen as soon as David and Nick Sign there new deal.