| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
what you mean his brother who pretended to be chased through NY City?
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Royal Announcement has been trending on Twitter all morning. So many people will be sat refreshing their screens at the moment
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
thesheriff443
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
If it's Kate looking OK and happy then I'll be happy for her, if it's anything else then
what's changed. It's either bad news or more PR guff. Everyone at the very least has to at this point appreciate that not one word they say can be taken as anything but potential fiction. Royal Fam That Cried Wolf, and all that. I'll believe my own eyes but I don't believe anything they "say in a statement" and anyone who does at this point is exceptionally naive .
Last edited by user104658; 18-03-2024 at 02:09 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
sobbing incoherently, his wfh keyboard awash with salty tears if its good news
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
keep em coming SB, you are a howl today
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Probably an update on Charles if it happens
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
"If it's Kate looking OK and happy then I'll be happy for her,"
Good on SB |
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
"People" (the GBP) will not readily accept Kate being flawed. Or human in any way. That's what we're seeing at play here. |
||
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
If they really wanted away from it they would have lived private lives instead of churning out controversial interviews, books and podcasts, shouting out gimme gimme more attention than those old Royals! Waaagh! Now, everything they do is scrutinised, they have become trashy tabloid fodder, because that is what they opened themselves up to. They are laughing stocks and with the exception of Prince Andrew, the most disliked ‘Royals’. They have it much worse now than they ever had it as part of the ‘Firm’. If that is what you call ‘getting away from it’?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Kate is to be found at Adelaide cottage, recovering from a serious operation and William is naturally not going to be gung - ho, is he? |
||
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
It's not something I would expect you to be able to get your head around Jet. In terms of polarisation on the topic of the Royals, all you're missing is the red hat and reindeer. Utterly, utterly under to bootheel of terminal bias.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#18 | ||
|
|||
|
thesheriff443
|
Quote:
The person that agrees with you most is Niamh because she is anti royal like you It’s no good you posting that you give fcuk about Kate because you don’t, it’s just an opportunity to dig at members who don’t agree with you |
||
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
the notification that there will be an announcement, is in itself bollocks. It's just more of the same, and i find even the hint that there will be an announcement to be an utter nonsense.
On what planet do the BBC need prior notification that there will be an announcement, days in advance of the event
Last edited by bots; 18-03-2024 at 02:32 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#23 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
it's all a throw back to the days when the bbc were the only broadcaster, it hasn't been applicable in 70 years
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#24 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Indeed or at the very least 20 or so years with the end of "old-school" terrestrial telly... and the last 5 or so totally irrelevant as most people no longer use television as their main news source full stop.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#25 | |||
|
||||
|
1.5x speed
|
And now they're saying she's been seen out and about for a while taking her kids to school. Other parents have seen her. Where was this information before? So what was this circus about, actually?
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|