[arista]

Originally Posted by cupid stunt

dizzee shud be da prime minister or maybe wiley

No he has no Wife.

[cupid stunt]

Originally Posted by arista

No he has no Wife.

since when did a politican need 2 have a wife? half of them ****ers are batty boys anyway whether they married or not

[xDramatick]

Originally Posted by cupid stunt

since when did a politican need 2 have a wife? half of them ****ers are batty boys anyway whether they married or not

when will you learn - homophobic behaviour will not be tolerated on this site.
-sigh-

[arista]

Originally Posted by Darenn

when will you learn - homophobic behaviour will not be tolerated on this site.
-sigh-

Darenn
He will Never Change.



So Give Up or maybe ask James to Ban him
yet again.

[Stephanie]

Originally Posted by cupid stunt

dizzee shud be da prime minister or maybe wiley

dizzee

but no, that would just be utterly stupid.

[cupid stunt]

if cameron try cut peoples benefits then man dem gonna be rioting in da hood best believe it

[arista]

Originally Posted by cupid stunt

if cameron try cut peoples benefits then man dem gonna be rioting in da hood best believe it

"dem da"


It is Illegal to talk Text Gabble on this Forum.
You Dig



It May be a shock to you
but all of them would Cut Money.

[Angus]

Realistically, only two possible outcomes here, either a workable Con/Libdem coalition or Cameron forms a minority government. Posture as he may Brown is on his own in his desperation to cling to power under any circumstances - his own cabinet want to see the back of him. As for his hopes of a rainbow coalition, it is never going to happen since it would be made up of a bunch of LOSERS who do not have the mandate from the people to govern. What's more, in order to get SNP and Plaid Cymru on board Labour would have to pay them MILLIONS of our money, which Labour have NO RIGHT to do as it is a party political issue and not an issue in the interests of the country.

If Cleggy is going to be awkward and timewaste, Cameron needs to tell him to get lost and then get on and govern the country with a minority,(the Labour Party governed with a minority goverment of only 301 seats after the 1974 election) and then have another General Election in the autumn.

The LibDems have this one and only opportunity to have any say whatsoever in the running of this country, if they don't want to do so, they should p*ss off. One thing is certain LibDems will lose even more seats in the autumn election because next time the people will want to ensure either a Labour or Conservative government is elected with a majority. Funny thing is that even if Labour got ALL the LibDem seats next time around THEY would still not have a majority!!

[cupid stunt]

swear down nick clegg needs 2 hurry da **** up then we can finally have coffee shops over here and ppl over 18 can buy ganja wi out bein terrorised by police scum

[arista]

No need to Ditch Clegg
they will make use of him to get all the Votes in the house through.


And if Nick plays it OK
he can have some of the Cherry Pie.



But at least
New Dead Labour is going to be small.

[ange7]

Originally Posted by arista

No need to Ditch Clegg
they will make use of him to get all the Votes in the house through.


And if Nick plays it OK
he can have some of the Cherry Pie.



But at least
New Dead Labour is going to be small.

lib/lab plus welsh and scot nats plus 1 green = 'bliss'

[arista]

Originally Posted by ange7

lib/lab plus welsh and scot nats plus 1 green = 'bliss'

No.


As Brown did not Win The Election.


You can play any game

But David And Nick are working as One Force
to Keep The UK afloat
and are markets know this.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by ange7

lib/lab plus welsh and scot nats plus 1 green = 'bliss'

Only 325 seats! Double Bliss

[Harry!]

Originally Posted by angus58

Only 325 seats! Double Bliss

You need 326...

[Angus]

Originally Posted by Harry!

You need 326...

Yes, I know Harry that is what I am pointing out to our Aussie friend who clearly can't add up

[barcode]

A few facts need sorting in this debate before it goes any further.

Cameron is not the incumbent Prime Minister. If he was then why isn't he in office?

Cameron has not won the election. It isn't his right to form a government or he would have won 326 or more seats. In a hung parliament, the obligation to form a new government goes to the present PM. As Lib/Con are in talks, Gordon cannot do anything.

If Cameron forms a minority government, he will be an unelected Prime Minister.

angus58, being working class means you are lower class. Accept it.

Finally, I'll leave you Tories with a thought. If the Conservatives were trusted by the public then how can they still not win an election? Four terms on, a very weak Labour, Gordon Brown being the opposition, an economic meltdown, unnecessary war, bad public spending, huge debts, rising crime, dodgy MP expenses and even more, yet the public still don't trust Conservative. If they can't win that election even after having a huge lead to begin with, then their future looks bleak.

[arista]

Originally Posted by barcode

A few facts need sorting in this debate before it goes any further.

Cameron is not the incumbent Prime Minister. If he was then why isn't he in office?

Cameron has not won the election. It isn't his right to form a government or he would have won 326 or more seats. In a hung parliament, the obligation to form a new government goes to the present PM. As Lib/Con are in talks, Gordon cannot do anything.

If Cameron forms a minority government, he will be an unelected Prime Minister.

angus58, being working class means you are lower class. Accept it.

Finally, I'll leave you Tories with a thought. If the Conservatives were trusted by the public then how can they still not win an election? Four terms on, a very weak Labour, Gordon Brown being the opposition, an economic meltdown, unnecessary war, bad public spending, huge debts, rising crime, dodgy MP expenses and even more, yet the public still don't trust Conservative. If they can't win that election even after having a huge lead to begin with, then their future looks bleak.

Yes they did not Win
David Beat your New Dead Labour Party.


And David and Nick will push
One Eyed Scottish Brown Out
Fact.


You Fecking Lost

[barcode]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes they did not Win
But they Beat your New Dead Labour Party.


You Fecking Lost

I didn't state my political bias idiot. It's not Labour.

[arista]

Originally Posted by barcode

I didn't state my political bias.
It's not Labour.

You do not Have to.

Its David and Nick


or


One Eyed Scottish Brown.


No other Choice.
At this Time.

[Angus]

Originally Posted by barcode

A few facts need sorting in this debate before it goes any further.

Cameron is not the incumbent Prime Minister. If he was then why isn't he in office?

Cameron has not won the election. It isn't his right to form a government or he would have won 326 or more seats. In a hung parliament, the obligation to form a new government goes to the present PM. As Lib/Con are in talks, Gordon cannot do anything.

If Cameron forms a minority government, he will be an unelected Prime Minister.

angus58, being working class means you are lower class. Accept it.

Finally, I'll leave you Tories with a thought. If the Conservatives were trusted by the public then how can they still not win an election? Four terms on, a very weak Labour, Gordon Brown being the opposition, an economic meltdown, unnecessary war, bad public spending, huge debts, rising crime, dodgy MP expenses and even more, yet the public still don't trust Conservative. If they can't win that election even after having a huge lead to begin with, then their future looks bleak.

No YOU are misinformed. Cameron has every right to form a minority government right NOW if he so wishes. The fact that he is trying for a coalition in order to ensure a majority in the Commons is so that the Tories will be immediately able to push through legislation without having to worry about numbers. Personally I would prefer a minority government till we have another election in the autumn. Better than dealing with smarmy Clegg whose pathetic number of seats, even when added to Labour's haul, still falls short of a majority!

As to being lower class, I have no problem with that if that's how you define working class. It's just that the expression is really so anachronistic and not often heard outside of old episodes of "Upstairs, Downstairs"(Lol).

I reckon we all got the government we voted for (after all looking back to the 1974 election, despite Ted Heath making a right balls up of his term in office, there were only 4 seats in it between him and Wilson when I would have thought it would be a landslide for Labour!). Wilson formed a minority government with 301 seats then went to the country 6 months later and got a small majority. Cameron HAS WON THE MOST SEATS, so get over it. NEW LABOUR ARE DEAD, now we just have to bury them.

I will leave YOU with a thought, NONE of the other parties even came close to the number of seats the Conservatives won, so basically they have the most credible mandate to govern (as a minority) whether you or anyone else likes it or not. The people have effectively told Brown to stuff his party where the sun don't shine, so clearly the Labour Party HAVE lost the trust of the country. Across the nation the Tories needed only 16000 more votes across all of the constituencies to have won an outright majority which is a highly achievable result for the next election. Labour have a mountain to climb, whereas the Tories have a molehill.

[ange7]

Originally Posted by angus58

No YOU are misinformed. Cameron has every right to form a minority government right NOW if he so wishes. The fact that he is trying for a coalition in order to ensure a majority in the Commons is so that the Tories will be immediately able to push through legislation without having to worry about numbers. Personally I would prefer a minority government till we have another election in the autumn. Better than dealing with smarmy Clegg whose pathetic number of seats, even when added to Labour's haul, still falls short of a majority!

As to being lower class, I have no problem with that if that's how you define working class. It's just that the expression is really so anachronistic and not often heard outside of old episodes of "Upstairs, Downstairs"(Lol).

I reckon we all got the government we voted for (after all looking back to the 1974 election, despite Ted Heath making a right balls up of his term in office, there were only 4 seats in it between him and Wilson when I would have thought it would be a landslide for Labour!). Wilson formed a minority government with 301 seats then went to the country 6 months later and got a small majority. Cameron HAS WON THE MOST SEATS, so get over it. NEW LABOUR ARE DEAD, now we just have to bury them.

I will leave YOU with a thought, NONE of the other parties even came close to the number of seats the Conservatives won, so basically they have the most credible mandate to govern (as a minority) whether you or anyone else likes it or not. The people have effectively told Brown to stuff his party where the sun don't shine, so clearly the Labour Party HAVE lost the trust of the country. Across the nation the Tories needed only 16000 more votes across all of the constituencies to have won an outright majority which is a highly achievable result for the next election. Labour have a mountain to climb, whereas the Tories have a molehill.

"I will leave YOU with a thought"
mahahahaha

let's have it then!! :P

[barcode]

Originally Posted by angus58

No YOU are misinformed. Cameron has every right to form a minority government right NOW if he so wishes. The fact that he is trying for a coalition in order to ensure a majority in the Commons is so that the Tories will be immediately able to push through legislation without having to worry about numbers. Personally I would prefer a minority government till we have another election in the autumn. Better than dealing with smarmy Clegg whose pathetic number of seats, even when added to Labour's haul, still falls short of a majority!

As to being lower class, I have no problem with that if that's how you define working class. It's just that the expression is really so anachronistic and not often heard outside of old episodes of "Upstairs, Downstairs"(Lol).

I reckon we all got the government we voted for (after all looking back to the 1974 election, despite Ted Heath making a right balls up of his term in office, there were only 4 seats in it between him and Wilson when I would have thought it would be a landslide for Labour!). Wilson formed a minority government with 301 seats then went to the country 6 months later and got a small majority. Cameron HAS WON THE MOST SEATS, so get over it. NEW LABOUR ARE DEAD, now we just have to bury them.

I will leave YOU with a thought, NONE of the other parties even came close to the number of seats the Conservatives won, so basically they have the most credible mandate to govern (as a minority) whether you or anyone else likes it or not. The people have effectively told Brown to stuff his party where the sun don't shine, so clearly the Labour Party HAVE lost the trust of the country. Across the nation the Tories needed only 16000 more votes across all of the constituencies to have won an outright majority which is a highly achievable result for the next election. Labour have a mountain to climb, whereas the Tories have a molehill.

Nobody has WON the election, hence we have a hung parliament. For a party to win, 326 seats are needed. Lib/Con have made an agreement meaning David Cameron is now an UNELECTED PM, just like Brown.

The majority of the latest batch of Conservative voters are anti-Brown. If Labour get a new leader in time for the next election, I wouldn't be so sure Conservative only have a molehill to climb.

It is Brown's right to form a government first but Lib Dems hold the key due to their number of seats; if they are in talks with Conservative them obviously he cannot do anything.

If Labour had 307 seats and Conservative 258 and David Cameron was 'squatting', would you still hold the same views that you do? Of course not.

[ange7]

Originally Posted by barcode

A few facts need sorting in this debate before it goes any further.

Cameron is not the incumbent Prime Minister. If he was then why isn't he in office?

Cameron has not won the election. It isn't his right to form a government or he would have won 326 or more seats. In a hung parliament, the obligation to form a new government goes to the present PM. As Lib/Con are in talks, Gordon cannot do anything.

If Cameron forms a minority government, he will be an unelected Prime Minister.

angus58, being working class means you are lower class. Accept it.

Finally, I'll leave you Tories with a thought. If the Conservatives were trusted by the public then how can they still not win an election? Four terms on, a very weak Labour, Gordon Brown being the opposition, an economic meltdown, unnecessary war, bad public spending, huge debts, rising crime, dodgy MP expenses and even more, yet the public still don't trust Conservative. If they can't win that election even after having a huge lead to begin with, then their future looks bleak.

Great points but they are lost on these guys.
Conservatives had a dream run but couldn't win.

[arista]

"It is Brown's right to form a government first but Lib Dems hold the key due to their number of seats; if they are in talks with Conservative them obviously he cannot do anything. "


Brown gave Up his Right
by letting David and Nick go first.
Utter Fact.


Case Closed

[ange7]

Originally Posted by arista

"It is Brown's right to form a government first but Lib Dems hold the key due to their number of seats; if they are in talks with Conservative them obviously he cannot do anything. "


Brown gave Up his Right
by letting David and Nick go first.
Utter Fact.


Case Closed

what case?
If the deal falls through... then what? Gordon! plus the welsh and scot nats... that's what.
You missed his whole point of cameron having a dream run into those elections but still dropping the ball.