[Kyle]

I'm not beyond the idea that it is an inside job, humans are capable of some pretty sick stuff but then Again you can make a conspiracy for anything really.

If someone really wanted they could say it was Giant Lizards that orchestrated the events and they were in league with aliens in a big plot to send the U.S into War and make their foreign policy disliked so that nobody trusted anybody and the world would be easy pickings.

I'll stick with the official version of things.

[fingers]

Unfortunately Official Versions of Things can also be quite untrue, like why we went to war in Iraq, because Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and that these were capable of being deployed in 40 minutes.

[Kyle]

Originally Posted by fingers

Unfortunately Official Versions of Things can also be quite untrue, like why we went to war in Iraq, because Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and that these were capable of being deployed in 40 minutes.

Yeh and for the most part it's public consensus now. If 9/11 was an Inside job surely we would feel the same as we do about the second Gulf War

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by fingers

Unfortunately Official Versions of Things can also be quite untrue, like why we went to war in Iraq, because Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and that these were capable of being deployed in 40 minutes.

But the US never lied about weapons of mass destruction. It would have been easy for the US to plant WMD during the invasion and say "look, here they are!", if they knew there were no WMD before the war, and wanted to lie to people why would they admit that there were none? The US was completely honest about not finding any. It would have been much easier for them to plant some if it was a conspiracy.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by lostalex

But the US never lied about weapons of mass destruction. It would have been easy for the US to plant WMD during the invasion and say "look, here they are!", if they knew there were no WMD before the war, and wanted to lie to people why would they admit that there were none? The US was completely honest about not finding any. It would have been much easier for them to plant some.

Whatever, and no doubt you are in awe of the Bush father and sons?

I seem to remember a former General, Colin Powell, I believe who peddled the WMD story and Dubya swallowed it as gospel.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by fingers

Whatever, and no doubt you are in awe of the Bush father and sons?

wtf. I'm a Democrat, you must not pay much attention around here if you don't know that by now.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by lostalex

But the US never lied about weapons of mass destruction. It would have been easy for the US to plant WMD during the invasion and say "look, here they are!", if they knew there were no WMD before the war, and wanted to lie to people why would they admit that there were none? The US was completely honest about not finding any. It would have been much easier for them to plant some if it was a conspiracy.

Why President Bush went to war in Iraq:

Youtube video

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by lostalex

But the US never lied about weapons of mass destruction. It would have been easy for the US to plant WMD during the invasion and say "look, here they are!", if they knew there were no WMD before the war, and wanted to lie to people why would they admit that there were none? The US was completely honest about not finding any. It would have been much easier for them to plant some if it was a conspiracy.

They were there, we sold them ... That's what we do we sell arms. We are arms dealers.
The latest was to the Maltese I think.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

They were there, we sold them ... That's what we do we sell arms. We are arms dealers.
The latest was to the Maltese I think.

we thought they had some as we had the copies of the receipts

[arista]

Everyone knows about it SamP
But so many Freaks want their own Website Angle on It.

This World is Full Of nutters


Watch Your Back

[Ninastar]

People can hate on Bush for whatever reasons, but to say he's behind 9/11 is beyond delusional.

my god some people in this world. jesus ****ing christ.

[lostalex]

There's a huge difference between being wrong about something, and lying about something.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by lostalex

There's a huge difference between being wrong about something, and lying about something.

Yeah, right!

[the truth]

powell bush blair the lot of them a bunch of lying parasties imo

[Z]

I would imagine if you had been on the receiving end of one of the USA's many interfering policies or wars, you would harbour a deep resentment towards the country, the way of life it promotes and the values it holds. I would imagine that the men who carried out the attacks on that fateful day felt that they were doing what the USA had done to so many innocent people around the world. It wasn't the work of troubled individuals turning to desperation, it was the work of a group of people who believed that what they were going to do would serve as justice, a form of revenge.

I just find it fascinating that Western media chose not to make these men infamous. I would imagine that that decision was a political one, they sought to stamp out the very reason why those men did what they did. By refusing to draw attention to their cause and instead magnifying the atrocity of what they did, the USA managed to turn a negative thing into a positive. Strong messages of anti-terrorism, national pride and patriotism have been at the forefront in the USA ever since.