[Nemo123]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

Except that didn't happen. LHO shot the president, and if you actually knew the details of his life, you'd find it nearly impossible to look beyond that evidence.

Jesus, you and I know we'll not sort this out here.
But i'll put a few points to you.
LBJ was on the verge of a serious indictment, and was facing a long prison sentence for corruption. The one fingerprint which was not accounted for in the book depository window, belonged to a hitman who worked for LBJ. Had LBJ not killed Kennedy he'd have been indicted for corruption and probably been sentenced to a long prison sentence. People have written tomes about this. What You do and what I've done is try to acquaint myself with the facts by reading and watching as much material as i can about it.

I'll summarize it. LBJ was going to jail. The CIA was going to be disbanded. The CIA were working to overthrow Castro. The oil industry were going to lose huge subsidies under Kennedy. The Mafia were betrayed by the Kennedys. They bought votes for him to win the '60 election, and Robert Kennedy repaid hem by hounding them. J Edgar Hoover openly feuded with the Kennedys. There's more, much more than I could write in a forthnight.

What it all adds up to is a conspiracy to kill JFK. The clincher for me is the finger print of Malcolm Mac Wallace, identified years later, as the only finger print in the window of the Book Depository. This guy killed and was convicted for killing LBJ's sister's boyfriend. He should have been executed, yet he got off with a 5 year sentence. Mac Wallace was a hired killer, and LBJ used him more than once.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

Well you see Girth, when a vice President kills the President, he becomes the President, and the most powerful person in the world.

He can also, 4 years later, prevent the truth about a deadly attack on an American Naval Vessel from damaging relations between countries and possible annoyance to lobbyists in his own country. It was only 34 sailors who died!

> http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...ssliberty.html

[fingers]

Originally Posted by fingers

He can also, 4 years later, prevent the truth about a deadly attack on an American Naval Vessel from damaging relations between countries and possible annoyance to lobbyists in his own country. It was only 34 sailors who died!

> http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...ssliberty.html

For some reason the video in the above link is truncated, this is the complete video, make up your own minds who is telling the truth

>

Youtube video

[Nemo123]

Did you know that people wept when he was killed. Just like Diana. Do you know the respect the office of the President use to hold? Killing the President was akin to killing the Pope. Nowadays I doubt people would care too much if either were killed.

[Nemo123]

I have long been fascinated by Kennedy's murder. I've gone from being sure to unsure and back again. A BBC newsreader named Gavin Esler convinced me about 10 years ago, that Oswald was the lone killer. Gavin Esler carries the weight of the BBC, full on his shoulders, so if he says Oswald did it, you believe it.
Gavin Esler is wrong. I'm not sure what his motives are or where, perhaps it helped his career. For a start, The US House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded JFK's death was a conspiracy, in 1978.

So let there be no doubt, a House Select Committee concluded Lee Harvey Oswald didn't act alone.

That was as far as the evidence permitted them to maintain the lie.
They said there was a fourth bullet, from the "Grassy Knoll".
IT WAS A CONSPIRACY. So says a United States House Select Committee in 1978.

Let me be clear, A UNITED STATES HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE SAID IN 1978, that JFK's murder was as a result of a conspiracy.

[Nemo123]

I gotta ram home this point,

A body appointed by the Senate to reinvestigate the Kennedy assassination, said it was a conspiracy, and there was a fourth or even a fifth bullet.

[Nemo123]

I want to remind all those people who poo-poo the conspiracy theory, A Senate House Committe on assassinations, concluded JFK's killing was a conspiracy, in 1978. It's not even contraversial.

[Nemo123]

Need I remind anyone of the presumption of innocence? Lee Harvey Oswald was never tried for killing anyone.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Originally Posted by Nemo123

Need I remind anyone of the presumption of innocence? Lee Harvey Oswald was never tried for killing anyone.

Yeah he was killed by some random before he could make a case for himself.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

The Lee Rigby conspiracy.

I don't know it's just weird how some people were casually passing by as the act was supposedly going on or even in the video where the killers are talking on the video.People are just casually passing by the murderers. looking at something on the road for sure, but seemingly not worried about their lives. There was a whole blog about it being fake.


I believe most conspiracies to be fair.

How about one of the teachers that was supposed to have died at Sandy hook shooting was seen at the Boston bombing.

And a child that was supposed to have died at sandy hook was seen on Obama's lap days later.

And yes the towers exploded because of a bomb not the plane.

[fingers]

Interesting background info on Mac Wallace and LBJ (and the strange death of LBJ's sister)

> http://www.viewzone.com/lbj/

[Livia]

I'm pretty sure Lee Rigby's widow doesn't think it never happened.

[fingers]

Originally Posted by Livia

I'm pretty sure Lee Rigby's widow doesn't think it never happened.

That's why the Rigby family are attending the trial of the 2 (alleged, since they haven't been convicted -YET) murderers.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Originally Posted by Livia

I'm pretty sure Lee Rigby's widow doesn't think it never happened.

Well there's always actors involved in these apparently. Like many of the sometimes "Polished" families we see releasing statements to ask for privacy or such are actors.

Like for one of the parents of one of the kids that died in Sandy hook. Seconds before they were due to go on air, they were laughing, then when it was lights. Sad face, tears...

Not saying the Lee Rigby story is completely fake but if the government want ti make something happen they do it, and they let us read what they want us to read.

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo

Well there's always actors involved in these apparently. Like many of the sometimes "Polished" families we see releasing statements to ask for privacy or such are actors.

Like for one of the parents of one of the kids that died in Sandy hook. Seconds before they were due to go on air, they were laughing, then when it was lights. Sad face, tears...

Not saying the Lee Rigby story is completely fake but if the government want ti make something happen they do it, and they let us read what they want us to read.

Youtube video

Do you mean this?

I was not aware of this but now have to admit that was strange behaviour for someone who's just lost a 6 year old.

I love a good conspiracy theory.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

Youtube video

Do you mean this?

I was not aware of this but now have to admit that was strange behaviour for someone who's just lost a 6 year old.

I love a good conspiracy theory.

That's the one. It's from a good 30-45 mins documentary.

There was a bit about the squad practicing for the very same type of rescue a month or so earlier like they knew it would happen and other bunch of things that make you think, hold on a mins.

[King Gizzard]

I reckon George Osbourne is secretly a cold blooded bastard lizard who's sole purpose in life is to cause misery for whoever he lays his eyes on

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Nathan

I reckon George Osbourne is secretly a cold blooded bastard lizard who's sole purpose in life is to cause misery for whoever he lays his eyes on

Thats at the very least 50% correct.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

another conspiracy about the lee rigby is that the killers hand was bloody as hell (people say fake blood) but his jumper was clean as hell.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Yukon Cornelius

I reckon George Osbourne is secretly a cold blooded bastard lizard who's sole purpose in life is to cause misery for whoever he lays his eyes on

I can agree as to that,he is.
Especially in a very cowardly, bullying way that he mainly picks on the weakest and poorest he knows about.

[GiRTh]

I think I'll take a look that

[Nemo123]

The men who killed Kennedy were professionals. They were given a job to do an they did it. Malcolm Mac Wallace had an especial job to do. A job that needed more than a simple explanation. He had to frame Lee Harvey Oswald. It was a complex job. The other killers had only to hit their target. Wallace had to frame Oswald. Wallace was a hired hitman who worked for Lyndon Baines Johnson.

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

I know nobody here care about the lee rigby conspiracies but damn every time I see the clip of the murderer talking it's so bloody weird how the 2 women just pass by them so casually, not fearing for their own life even though they clearly see them carrying the knives. There was plenty of space for them to walk but they walk past the murderers like nothing major is going on. And the consistency of the blood in his hand is weird plus how is his jumper so stainless. Strange things r gwan.

[Nemo123]

When I need some real escapism, I look at WW2 documentaries on Youtube. They lull me to sleep. It is ironic that listening to horrific war tales, narrated by a soothing voice, the best of which is sir Lawrence Olivier, who narrated "The World At War" series, lulls me to sleep like a lullaby. Indeed WW2 stories are like perfect lullabies to me. Almost everything about WW2 is like total escapism to me. Lately, or laterly, JFK onspiracies give me the same sense of escapism. They put me to sleep, not because they are boring, but because they are soothing. I believe it is because they are telling me the truth.
I've been fascinated with the murder of JFK for years. I've believe both sides of the story at one time or another. Recently, last May, I buried myself in the JFK assassination, to escape an uncomfortable incident in my own life.
I retreated into my bedroom, and to take my mind off things, I watched every thing I could find on the death of JFK. By the end of my time in my bedroom I thought I had learned everything about the JFK assassination. I did and I didn't. I knew JFK had been killed by Lyndon Baines Johnson, but I didn't have a complete explanation.
Later, and as recently as this week, I found as full and comprehensive account of JFK's death from two authors, Jerry Kroth, and Roger Stone. Jerry Kroth wrote a concise summary of the assassination in his latest book," Coup d'etat:The Assassination of President JFK", and Roger Stone's, "The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ".
What I like about Kroth's book is he narrows down the murder to a handful of individuals. He doesn't accuse anyone he's not sure of, and he is very careful and conservative. Stone's book goes far wider. I haven't read Stone's book but I will do. I think it is all more encompassing, whereas Kroth's book is narrow, but more pointed. Kroth's book shows a lean delineage between LBJ, the CIA and the mafia. It's plenty enough without delving any further.
When I last took an interest in this subject, all of 10 or 15 years ago, so much of what is known now was not known then. But interest seems to have wained just as evidence has waxed.
You can Youtube Jerry Kroth and Roger Stone and decide for yourself.

[Nemo123]

When I need some real escapism, I look at WW2 documentaries on Youtube. They lull me to sleep. It is ironic that listening to horrific war tales, narrated by a soothing voice, the best of which is sir Lawrence Olivier, who narrated "The World At War" series, lulls me to sleep like a lullaby. Indeed WW2 stories are like perfect lullabies to me. Almost everything about WW2 is like total escapism to me. Lately, or laterly, JFK onspiracies give me the same sense of escapism. They put me to sleep, not because they are boring, but because they are soothing. I believe it is because they are telling me the truth.
I've been fascinated with the murder of JFK for years. I've believe both sides of the story at one time or another. Recently, last May, I buried myself in the JFK assassination, to escape an uncomfortable incident in my own life.
I retreated into my bedroom, and to take my mind off things, I watched every thing I could find on the death of JFK. By the end of my time in my bedroom I thought I had learned everything about the JFK assassination. I did and I didn't. I knew JFK had been killed by Lyndon Baines Johnson, but I didn't have a complete explanation.
Later, and as recently as this week, I found as full and comprehensive account of JFK's death from two authors, Jerry Kroth, and Roger Stone. Jerry Kroth wrote a concise summary of the assassination in his latest book," Coup d'etat:The Assassination of President JFK", and Roger Stone's, "The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case Against LBJ".
What I like about Kroth's book is he narrows down the murder to a handful of individuals. He doesn't accuse anyone he's not sure of, and he is very careful and conservative. Stone's book goes far wider. I haven't read Stone's book but I will do. I think it is all more encompassing, whereas Kroth's book is narrow, but more pointed. Kroth's book shows a lean delineage between LBJ, the CIA and the mafia. It's plenty enough without delving any further.
When I last took an interest in this subject, all of 10 or 15 years ago, so much of what is known now was not known then. But interest seems to have wained just as evidence has waxed.
You can Youtube Jerry Kroth and Roger Stone and decide for yourself.