[mazerunner_888]

Originally Posted by rionablue

I saw the robe it was fully belted and down to her ankles. All the housemates wear robes at some stage, some with pyjames on some without. Chloe was entitled to wear it FFS she hardly expected a man who was puking his guts out in a toilet while she was asking him was he alright to make a grab for her robe was she!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!

Yes I get that point and I fully agree. She can wear what she wants and should not have to fear anyone pulling open her robe...

but...

She is in a house with cameras in every room, watching every move, you have some quite lively characters in there also. So it would be so easy to see how a play fight, someone messing around or simply getting into bed it would be soooo easy for her to flash her ample breasts by accident. To me I don't get why she would knowing all this be naked under her robe!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888

Yes I get that point and I fully agree. She can wear what she wants and should not have to fear anyone pulling open her robe...

but...

She is in a house with cameras in every room, watching every move, you have some quite lively characters in there also. So it would be so easy to see how a play fight, someone messing around or simply getting into bed it would be soooo easy for her to flash her ample breasts by accident. To me I don't get why she would knowing all this be naked under her robe!

Did she get involved in a play fight with this robe on or had she just been washing/showering before bed and heard Jeremy vomit before going to get ready?

Of course not. She must have been mastering the art of seduction.

THE POINT is that the robe wasn't opened by accident, it was purposely pulled open by Jeremy. What may or may not have happened by accident is completely besides the point.

[mazerunner_888]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

What may or may not have happened by accident is completely besides the point.

I agree but to me I still do find it strange to be naked under a robe held together with just a belt on national TV but yes that's up to her of course.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888

I agree but to me I still do find it strange to be naked under a robe held together with just a belt on national TV but yes that's up to her of course.

She'd just come out of the bathroom, maybe after showering? Maybe she was on her way to get dressed into PJs or something?

[Pincho Paxton]

I wouldn't pay to go to a strip joint where everyone is wearing dressing gowns!

Ł15 entrance fee
Girls naked under dressing gowns extravaganza!
Join us tonight!
Drink till you puke!
They may help you by passing you a loo roll fun!!!

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton

I wouldn't pay to go to a strip joint where everyone is wearing dressing gowns!

Ł15 entrance fee
Girls naked under dressing gowns extravaganza!
Join us tonight!
Drink till you puke!
They may help you by passing you a loo roll fun!!!

[Anaesthesia]

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Anaesthesia

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

That doesn't make it any more right or acceptable

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by Anaesthesia

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

Looks like I'm not much of an opportunist cuz I can definitely say I wouldn't be putting my hands on anyone unless I was sure they wanted me to.

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Anaesthesia

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

Only the ones with terrible judgement/low morality

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Anaesthesia

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form, Of couse they would

[Daniel.]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form, Of couse they would

It's completely different, those pictures are there to admire, exposing someone isn't to be done without permission

[Anaesthesia]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form, Of couse they would

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form, Of couse they would

It's a bit different tbh. Like when Chloe mentioned her page 3 modelling.

Those images are her choice to put in the public arena. Nothing to do with someone helping themselves to opening your clothes.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It's a bit different tbh. Like when Chloe mentioned her page 3 modelling.

Those images are her choice to put in the public arena. Nothing to do with someone helping themselves to opening your clothes.

Spoiler:

Don't spoil it Marsh

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Spoiler:

Don't spoil it Marsh

[kirklancaster]

QUOTE=Kazanne;7474950] Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form, Of couse they would [/QUOTE]

Kazanne!!!!

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Anaesthesia

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

Leaning over him? Was she?

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Leaning over him? Was she?

Yes ,she was

[Daniel.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Yes ,she was

It still makes absoloutley no difference

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Yes ,she was

There was no camera in the toilet hun.

The small bit we did see through the door she was sat down and not leaning anywhere near him.

Spoiler:

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

There was no camera in the toilet hun.

The small bit we did see through the door she was sat down and not leaning anywhere near him.

Spoiler:

On your tv ,but as we've proved ,it not working as good as it should be

[Anaesthesia]

We're talking drunkenness here, and no, I'm not trying to justify anything, just saying, in a drunken state, not rational thinking state, can you honestly say you or anyone you know, wouldn't find it funny?

[Liam-]

Morsh scalping with imagery

[Liam-]

lmfao and then we know that Marsh wins the argument <3