[Jack The Cat]

Originally Posted by abhorson

This is BB. Not the GE!

I agree, the "Truth" is a very ambiguous word, always depends on the individuals point of view.

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

I agree, the "Truth" is a very ambiguous word, always depends on the individuals point of view.

So agree. But a few numpties on here because of KH's political leanings think they can class every supporter of hers as BNP, EDL, CON, UKIP etc. Frigging idiots for doing so. I am a voter of none of these, but i respect the right of anybody to do so, whatever my personal thoughts. I am an activist for the SNP and as most know by now, in Scotland, the Labour party is seen as vermin. But also respect the Labour voters choice up here to vote for them.

I still like KH. That is my choice.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by abhorson

So agree. But a few numpties on here because of KH's political leanings think they can class every supporter of hers as BNP, EDL, CON, UKIP etc. Frigging idiots for doing so. I am a voter of none of these, but i respect the right of anybody to do so. Whatever my personal thoughts. I am an activist for the SNP and as most know by now. In Scotland, the Labour party is seen as vermin. But that is Labour voters choice up here to vote for them.

I still like KH. That is my choice.

It's not idiotic to think that most of Hopkins fans are right wing, not all of them but most of them just to clarify before my words get twisted again.

[Niamh.]

I really disliked her before she went in because of what she was like on twitter etc, inside the house she seems exactly the same so I can't for the life of me understand how she wasn't popular before but she is now

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I really disliked her before she went in because of what she was like on twitter etc, inside the house she seems exactly the same so I can't for the life of me understand how she wasn't popular before but she is now

I didn't like her , but do now , but everytime we try to explain why,we get shot down ,so really no point saying much , I will just support her, Calum and Cheggars and hope one of them wins.

[Marsh.]

Violent extremists are voting to save Cheggers? Here for ISIS.

[Jack The Cat]

Because people find offense in what she has to say and want to censor her. People finding offense in words which are legal, scares me.

It is not Katie I necessary like but I feel I have to stand with her, against those who feel she is wrong in saying anything or everything (Legal) that she wishes to say.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

Because people find offense in what she has to say and want to censor her. People finding offense in words which are legal, scares me.

It is not Katie I necessary like but I feel I have to stand with her, against those who feel she is wrong in saying anything or everything (Legal) that she wishes to say.

She can say what she likes but everyone else has a right to disagree with her and think she's an arsehole for saying the stuff she does

[Jack The Cat]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

She can say what she likes but everyone else has a right to disagree with her and think she's an arsehole for saying the stuff she does

Oh I totally agree with you but a lot of people out there have expressed the desire for her to be "Stopped".

[jaxie]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

Because people find offense in what she has to say and want to censor her. People finding offense in words which are legal, scares me.

It is not Katie I necessary like but I feel I have to stand with her, against those who feel she is wrong in saying anything or everything (Legal) that she wishes to say.

I'm not censoring her.

[Jack The Cat]

Originally Posted by jaxie

I'm not censoring her.

I accept that but many people are and as long as at least one person is, I will stand with Katie.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

I accept that but many people are and as long as at least one person is, I will stand with Katie.

Nobody's censored her. Sh*t continues to spill out of her mouth.

I just don't think she as a person is at all worthy of getting paid for it/making a career out of it.

[Jack The Cat]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Nobody's censored her. Sh*t continues to spill out of her mouth.

I just don't think she as a person is at all worthy of getting paid for it/making a career out of it.

Nobody has, yet, but some people want and feel they have a right to (As she offends them).

[jaxie]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

I accept that but many people are and as long as at least one person is, I will stand with Katie.

What I don't get about your stand point is that she seems to say exactly what she likes so I'm not clearwho you feel she needs defending from. But thank you for being the only person to give a view and back it up about liking her.

[Jack The Cat]

Originally Posted by jaxie

What I don't get about your stand point is that she seems to say exactly what she likes so I'm not clearwho you feel she needs defending from. But thank you for being the only person to give a view and back it up about liking her.

Fair point, I don't think I feel I need to defend her as such, guess it is a gut feeling more than anything.


Sorry I can't be more precise.

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

Because people find offense in what she has to say and want to censor her. People finding offense in words which are legal, scares me.

It is not Katie I necessary like but I feel I have to stand with her, against those who feel she is wrong in saying anything or everything (Legal) that she wishes to say.

I agree with this totally.

I may not agree with her, i may even be offended by her; but i defend her right to disagree with me or even offend me.

Look at the countries/regimes that have taken away that right. Who wants to live like that?

[darkestcornwall]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

Because people find offense in what she has to say and want to censor her. People finding offense in words which are legal, scares me.

It is not Katie I necessary like but I feel I have to stand with her, against those who feel she is wrong in saying anything or everything (Legal) that she wishes to say.

Je suis Katie Hopkins.

[jaxie]

People keep saying she tells the truth but are unable or unwilling to give an example of it. Which leaves me to wonder if people know what she stands for or if they are afraid to say it. If she is a good egg, what is wrong with describing how she tells the truth? That silence is somewhat sinister.

[JTM45]

She's a disgusting NOBODY!!!!
A loser from The Apprentice and a harbinger of misery and hatred!

How anyone who confesses to be a good person can agree with or support her horrible, disgusting, hate-filled opinions and views is a complete mystery to me!

She 'claims' to be intelligent yet she thinks children should be judged and treated in a negative way purely because their parents decided to call them a name she doesn't approve of!
That's the height of ignorance, rudeness, bigotry and stupidity and it pretty much sums this poor excuse for a woman up to a tee!

She stands for the worst of the worst and i look forward to the rapidly approaching day when we will never hear from or have to see this joke of a person ever again!

I'm extremely glad and proud to be the person i am with the morals, beliefs and views that i posses and it makes me feel kinda' sorry for anyone who's that disgusting and morally polluted that they thrive on hatred and delusional superiority in the way that Hopkins does!

[poppsywoppsy]

Can I say I belong to no extremist groups, am totally a family orientated person and support Katie Hopkins.

Whatever those who don't like her care to sling her way and her supporters way, she was the only one who actually stood up to the cretin called Perez.

She was not interested in feeding the troll, she stands up to someone who was the dregs of humanity.

I may not agree with all she says but I agree with a lot.

Those who celebrate behaviour of the gutter are way lower than anything KH did in the house.

So, if others can't see it, well lots can, have complained to the authorities and will not jump on the Perez bandwagon.

[jaxie]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

Can I say I belong to no extremist groups, am totally a family orientated person and support Katie Hopkins.

Whatever those who don't like her care to sling her way and her supporters way, she was the only one who actually stood up to the cretin called Perez.

She was not interested in feeding the troll, she stands up to someone who was the dregs of humanity.

I may not agree with all she says but I agree with a lot.

Those who celebrate behaviour of the gutter are way lower than anything KH did in the house.

So, if others can't see it, well lots can, have complained to the authorities and will not jump on the Perez bandwagon.

You seem to imply its Hopkins of Perez. I don't want either, thanks all the same. There are other angles and options. Once again none of her supporters except seem able to give a reason why they support. You agree with a lot she says. What then?what is OK,and what isn't?

[Jack The Cat]

Originally Posted by jaxie

You seem to imply its Hopkins of Perez. I don't want either, thanks all the same. There are other angles and options. Once again none of her supporters except seem able to give a reason why they support. You agree with a lot she says. What then?what is OK,and what isn't?

For me personally, everything is OK unless it is lawfully deamed illegal.

However I never met, or heard of any person in the world who I could say I agree with everything they have ever said. It would be disingenuous for me to state otherwise.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

For me personally, everything is OK unless it is lawfully deamed illegal.

However I never met, or heard of any person in the world who I could say I agree with everything they have ever said. It would be disingenuous for me to state otherwise.

The have a set of contractual rules that they need to adhere too. Obviously, if they break a law that takes precedence, but if they violate any of their contractual rules they will be warned/thrown out for it

[Jack The Cat]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The have a set of contractual rules that they need to adhere too. Obviously, if they break a law that takes precedence, but if they violate any of their contractual rules they will be warned/thrown out for it

You are of course right, without access to this information I could not say what the details of the contracts are or how they are enforced, so it is difficult to comment. Thus I only speak in general terms.

[jaxie]

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat

For me personally, everything is OK unless it is lawfully deamed illegal.

However I never met, or heard of any person in the world who I could say I agree with everything they have ever said. It would be disingenuous for me to state otherwise.

I respect your point of view and you explained it very well tough I can't agree with your support of her for myself based on some of the things she says because they seem spiteful/controversial for the sake of it. I think that free speech is entirely different to making public statements that serve no purpose but to be nasty about certain groups of people. Of course she has the right to say what she wants but does she have the right to villify people publicly. Isn't saying ginger babies are hard to love a very fine line away from saying the same thing about black babies? And what do those kinds of free speech achieve except to make people feel inferior or uncomfortable in their own skin. You can't diet away ginger hair. So while I can accept your point of view I can't help feel the meat of your stance is misguided. I am not sure you are standing up for her right to be heard or her right to be cruel because you view that as part of her right to be heard.