[Denver]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

That seems like speculation and until it's a fact that he's actually endangered people then I think this story is unneeded.

But it also needs to be out there if it is true as he may have had one night stands and the women never got tested.

[Kizzy]

Why is it in SD too, is it imperative we know, or of national importance?
Celebs are as susceptible to life limiting diseases as the rest of us, what's to debate.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Why is it in SD too, is it imperative we know, or of national importance?
Celebs are as susceptible to life limiting diseases as the rest of us, what's to debate.

It's serious Debates and News Kizzy, this qualifies as News

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It's serious Debates and News Kizzy, this qualifies as News

I thought celebs had their own news bit?...

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I thought celebs had their own news bit?...

still News

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

still News

Rolls eyes.

[Livia]

I don't know who this refers to and I don't care. Whoever they are this is a massive invasion of their privacy and I just wish them well without ever wanting to know who they are.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Livia

I don't know who this refers to and I don't care. Whoever they are this is a massive invasion of their privacy and I just wish them well without ever wanting to know who they are.

Don't you think the women he failed to tell deserve to know?

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by Adam.

Don't you think the women he failed to tell deserve to know?

Yeah they deserve to know, but we don't need to. I think that's what Livia's saying.

The women involved can be told without it being made into a public event.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Jamie89

Yeah they deserve to know, but we don't need to. I think that's what Livia's saying.

The women involved can be told without it being made into a public event.

People love the downfall of the mighty

its very human

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Jamie89

Yeah they deserve to know, but we don't need to. I think that's what Livia's saying.

The women involved can be told without it being made into a public event.

What if its a non famous person who they no longer have contact with?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Adam.

What if its a non famous person who they no longer have contact with?

Then it's like life where people don't make statements to the press to contact sexual partners they never see again.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Adam.

Don't you think the women he failed to tell deserve to know?

Originally Posted by Jamie89

Yeah they deserve to know, but we don't need to. I think that's what Livia's saying.

The women involved can be told without it being made into a public event.

Thank you, Jamie. That's exactly what I meant.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Livia

I don't know who this refers to and I don't care. Whoever they are this is a massive invasion of their privacy and I just wish them well without ever wanting to know who they are.

Sure but he is in the Public Eye
and the Women he took to bed have
a Outright Right to know if he has infected them.

Thats Set in USA Law

[Crimson Dynamo]

Its new because he has aids

he did not get aids for some film roll

[Ninastar]

Probably really disgusting of me, but since when have I cared about what people think of me... Anyway, my first thought was 'I hope its someone who's known for being a sleaze' because then maybe people will realizing that sleeping with tons of people is not a good thing.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Chaos

Probably really disgusting of me, but since when have I cared about what people think of me... Anyway, my first thought was 'I hope its someone who's known for being a sleaze' because then maybe people will realizing that sleeping with tons of people is not a good thing.

I love a gal with morals.

[Jamie89]

Originally Posted by Chaos

Probably really disgusting of me, but since when have I cared about what people think of me... Anyway, my first thought was 'I hope its someone who's known for being a sleaze' because then maybe people will realizing that sleeping with tons of people is not a good thing.

I get what you're saying, and it probably could have that effect, but a part of me also thinks that people need to realise that you don't need to be a 'slag' to catch diseases. A lot of people have unprotected sex as like a one off, thinking "well I'll probably be ok coz I don't do it all the time" and that's also a dangerous attitude to have. So if it was someone who isn't known for being a sleaze it could help curb that sort of thing happening. All of that's just 'in theory' anyway though because I'm against whoever it is being outed by the media regardless lol

[Ninastar]

i hope that's not sarcasm!!!!

But yeah, I seriously hate the whole what I call 'Charlie Sheen' attitude that some celebs/people have. It sounds awful but I always hope they get what they deserve.

[erinp5]

Kermit!!!

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by erinp5

Kermit!!!

Miss piggy been playing away?

[Kizzy]

'A prominent LGBT blogger has hit out at The Daily Mirror for publishing an "insensitive, backward-thinking, blame-ridden" poll asking readers if they sympathised with an unnamed Hollywood star who reportedly has HIV.

The Sun controversially splashed on Wednesday on claims a "superstar" had contracted the virus, which was condemned as "irresponsible" by campaigners.

Susie Boniface, better known as 'Fleet Street Fox', revealed her distaste for the celebrity and attacked the man in a piece in The Mirror, The Sun's left-wing rival. "I don't feel sorry for him," Boniface wrote.

The column, published on Thursday, said: "I’m sorry I can’t strangle him with a cheap condom he couldn’t be bothered to use, and I can only hope his former lovers sue him so hard that he does at least die in the same misery, poverty and pain as so many others do."

Some readers took contention with Boniface's piece, but they reserved particular scorn for a poll within the article that asked: "Do you feel sorry for the famous actor with HIV?"

A total of 77% of respondents said they did not, while 23% said they did, according to the screengrab.'

Wow :/

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015...n_8544426.html

[Marsh.]

Personally, I've never been a supporter of people being exposed in the media before actually being found guilty of their crimes.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Personally, I've never been a supporter of people being exposed in the media before actually being found guilty of their crimes.

Nor me Marsh, nor me.

[Kizzy]

There is no comparison, being investigated by the police for historic abuse may make you subject to a media witch hunt the rights and wrongs of that can be debated.
But to be hounded, pilloried, mocked, judged and vilified for having a disease?.... That's a different kettle of fish.