[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

An event for Veterans......

Cute next to gorgeous

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Cute next to gorgeous

Yeah the red dress is pretty aswell

[jet]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

An event for Veterans......

She's entitled to wear what she wants but IMO Meghan often dresses inappropriately. That's a nice dress for a gala, the red carpet or the like, but not for an event for veterans. It's too 'look at me' blingy!

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

She's entitled to wear what she wants but IMO Meghan often dresses inappropriately. That's a nice dress for a gala or the like, but not for an event for veterans. It's too 'look at me' blingy!

Salute to Freedom Gala.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

An event for Veterans......

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

An event for Veterans......

"No words needed", just casually comparing two women like it's a cattle market . Nothing to see here.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

"No words needed", just casually comparing two women like it's a cattle market . Nothing to see here.

It's funny cos I remember people also commenting on how drab she looked at the visit to the 911 site.........it will be wrong no matter what she wears

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It's funny cos I remember people also commenting on how drab she looked at the visit to the 911 site.........it will be wrong no matter what she wears

Breaking News: Rubbish Meghan Seen In Public Not Looking Like Kate

and/or

Trying Too Hard To Look Like Kate

(delete as appropriate)

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Breaking News: Rubbish Meghan Seen In Public Not Looking Like Kate

and/or

Trying Too Hard To Look Like Kate

(delete as appropriate)

I hate how women are always compared like that. They're both beautiful women, totally different though both in looks and style, comparing them is pointless and petty

[Liam-]

Meghan rocking a beautiful poppy red, lol a goddess

[Beso]

And shes dragging the Ill queen into a political debate.

[rusticgal]

I would say she has a good case...it was a deliberate and malicious move by Meghan.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I would say she has a good case...it was a deliberate and malicious move by Meghan.

I reckon the whole family is cut on the same cloth.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I would say she has a good case...it was a deliberate and malicious move by Meghan.

the irony is it would never have come out (s the narrative was that they did not collude with Scobie on the book) unless she had sued the Mail

[bots]

Originally Posted by Cherie

the irony is it would never have come out (s the narrative was that they did not collude with Scobie on the book) unless she had sued the Mail

it's like a house of cards ... once the one card falls, it opens up everyone to then have their say

[bots]

next week Harry will be wearing the dress

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

next week Harry will be wearing the dress

Why?

[thesheriff443]

I’m not interested in what she wears the facts are and proven to be facts
They are a pair of lying manipulating arse holes

And proves everyone one on here right that didn’t fall for their bullsh1t

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

And proves everyone one on here right that didn’t fall for their bullsh1t

I mean, it doesn't... because the issue that most people have had with how these threads go on here has nothing to do with what they are saying or doing, but the obsessive misogynistic vitriol that's aimed at them, the mocking, trolling, baiting etc. that isn't justified by ... anything. The "problem" people have has nothing to do with "believing the things they have to say". So it doesn't matter what "comes out about them", people are still going to have things to say about the rhetoric surrounding it.

For example, if every word Meghan Markle has ever said in her entire life has been a lie, that still does not justify Prize Hams objectifying and comparing the "royal wives" like shopping Harry and William had their butlers pick up at Waitrose.

The problem remains the same. It was never and still is not about "stanning H&M" and it genuinely concerns me that people still don't understand that after it being explained literally dozens of times.

The only conclusion can be that people do not want to understand that.

Because we don't want to conclude that people are illiterate or thick .

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I mean, it doesn't... because the issue that most people have had with how these threads go on here has nothing to do with what they are saying or doing, but the obsessive misogynistic vitriol that's aimed at them, the mocking, trolling, baiting etc. that isn't justified by ... anything. The "problem" people have has nothing to do with "believing the things they have to say". So it doesn't matter what "comes out about them", people are still going to have things to say about the rhetoric surrounding it.

For example, if every word Meghan Markle has ever said in her entire life has been a lie, that still does not justify Prize Hams objectifying and comparing the "royal wives" like shopping Harry and William had their butlers pick up at Waitrose.

The problem remains the same. It was never and still is not about "stanning H&M" and it genuinely concerns me that people still don't understand that after it being explained literally dozens of times.

The only conclusion can be that people do not want to understand that.

Because we don't want to conclude that people are illiterate or thick .

You have written a whole load of nonsense throwing in a load crap to try and justify their actions
They have been proven to have lied to a court and proven to have tryed to manipulate the contents of the book.

Once and for all!

I don’t give to ffs

What colour she is or the fact she is a woman from the start I have said I didn’t believe her’s and his bollox

And the more truths that come out prove me to be right.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

You have written a whole load of nonsense throwing in a load crap to try and justify their actions
They have been proven to have lied to a court and proven to have tryed to manipulate the contents of the book.

Once and for all!

I don’t give to ffs

What colour she is or the fact she is a woman from the start I have said I didn’t believe her’s and his bollox

And the more truths that come out prove me to be right.

I've written plenty to justify Meghan's supposed "poor treatment" of her father and the crux of it has been other people's families are complex and none of anyone else's business, because no one has all of the information and that also will remain true no matter what little dribbles of information "come out". I suppose it largely applies to The Royals as well.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I've written plenty to justify Meghan's supposed "poor treatment" of her father and the crux of it has been other people's families are complex and none of anyone else's business, because no one has all of the information and that also will remain true no matter what little dribbles of information "come out". I suppose it largely applies to The Royals as well.

Ok
..so what business is it of yours that allows you to have an opinion on joe publics opinion on h and m as their family lives may be complicated

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

I mean, it doesn't... because the issue that most people have had with how these threads go on here has nothing to do with what they are saying or doing, but the obsessive misogynistic vitriol that's aimed at them, the mocking, trolling, baiting etc. that isn't justified by ... anything. The "problem" people have has nothing to do with "believing the things they have to say". So it doesn't matter what "comes out about them", people are still going to have things to say about the rhetoric surrounding it.

For example, if every word Meghan Markle has ever said in her entire life has been a lie, that still does not justify Prize Hams objectifying and comparing the "royal wives" like shopping Harry and William had their butlers pick up at Waitrose.

The problem remains the same. It was never and still is not about "stanning H&M" and it genuinely concerns me that people still don't understand that after it being explained literally dozens of times.

The only conclusion can be that people do not want to understand that.

Because we don't want to conclude that people are illiterate or thick .

The thing is they don’t want to listen to it. They’d rather be toxic on the internet.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

The thing is they don’t want to listen to it. They’d rather be toxic on the internet.

Keep defending liars because it’s you that can’t face the reality of the people you hold so highly are liars only interest in themselves

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

objectifying and comparing the "royal wives"

I hope you aren't referring to members here doing that, because that is a very rare occurrence in these threads as far as my memory serves me.