[GoldHeart]

We'll probably never know for sure, and people will always wonder if it's true. Either way I doubt anything will be done.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

We'll probably never know for sure, and people will always wonder if it's true. Either way I doubt anything will be done.

what can be done?

if i said you did that too

what do you want done about it?

[Beso]

The man is very restrained with toff on gogglebox.

[arista]

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by arista

I still dont understand why Bojo is responsible for his Dads actions, are we responsible for our parents?

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I still dont understand why Bojo is responsible for his Dads actions, are we responsible for our parents?

I agree Cherie ,it seems that narrative only fits when it suits, concentrate on the accused ,not their children . or is it just another chance to have a go at the PM ?

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I agree Cherie ,it seems that narrative only fits when it suits, concentrate on the accused ,not their children . or is it just another chance to have a go at the PM ?

who was PM in 2003, maybe we can drag them into it

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Cherie

who was PM in 2003, maybe we can drag them into it

Hardly,since both instances are alleged to have occurred at CONSERVATIVE PARTY conferences.

Plus the second when Johnson was PM.

No he's not responsible for his Dad's actions.
However one would expect his Dad to act with at least some decency at his Son's first conference as PM.

Bit of a stretch to try to bring Labour or a Labour PM into this however..
Labour doesn't attend Conservative Party conferences.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I agree Cherie ,it seems that narrative only fits when it suits, concentrate on the accused ,not their children . or is it just another chance to have a go at the PM ?

Did you think this way, when the press were getting at the deceased Father of the Miliband's to try to discredit Ed Miliband's 2015 election campaign.

Did you at that time say the Miliband's Father's actions were nothing to do with his sons?

I never saw anything from you to that effect on here.
Content possibly then to have Miliband slaughtered by the press re his Father.

However it mustn't be the case for this Leader Johnson.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Did you think this way, when the press were getting at the deceased Father of the Miliband's to try to discredit Ed Miliband's 2015 election campaign.

Did you at that time say the Miliband's Father's actions were nothing to do with his sons?

I never saw anything from you to that effect on here.
Content possibly then to have Miliband slaughtered by the press re his Father.

However it mustn't be the case for this Leader Johnson.

I don't even know what you are referring to Joey, I did not know much about Miliband or his dad so wouldn't have commented, but then I wasn't following politics as such, so don't even know the story you are referring to.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I still dont understand why Bojo is responsible for his Dads actions, are we responsible for our parents?

Because Stanley goes to the Boris Johnson Political Conferences
and Stanley is Political speaker in Green Issues.



Kier Starmer wants the Police (what he stated yesterday)
if the Conservative Party do nothing - which is what they are

[arista]

[arista]

[Mr Johnson told Sky: 'I have no recollection of
Caroline Nokes at all - but there you go.
And no reply... good luck and thanks']



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...legations.html

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

[Mr Johnson told Sky: 'I have no recollection of
Caroline Nokes at all - but there you go.
And no reply... good luck and thanks']



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...legations.html

That's not really a denial from him that it didn't happen then.

No recollection of Caroline wasn't no way did he ever do that.

''No recollection of Caroline''.
What does that tell us in a comparison to had he instead said, ''absolutely not I never did that''.

If I was ever accused of something I hadn't done and had the public opportunity to refute it.
I wouldn't be saying I had no recollection of it.
I'd be strenuously denying ever doing so.

What about the second accusation too.
Has he just avoided that addition to events?.

[bots]

prince Andrew's default response was "no recollection" ... it's a thing lawyers would tell you to say

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

prince Andrew's default response was "no recollection" ... it's a thing lawyers would tell you to say

Well obviously I know that.

However it is really not a fitting response.
I can say I've no recollection of an issue at an event, however that's not saying the issue didn't occur.

Of course lawyers would say things like no comment and/ or no recollection.
That's fine.

Really however, on this, IF it never took place, just say No it never happened like that.
Or is he concerned now in case any more will surface now too.

All I know is I'd be incensed to be accused of something I hadn't done like this, and at the very first and earliest opportunity would strongly and insistently make the firmest denial too.

That's my take on this.
I'm more with arista now.
I'd more now believe Caroline AND the second accuser too.

[arista]

[What about the second accusation too.
Has he just avoided that addition to events?]


That came after
since he spoke to SkyNews
he has refused to speak to any press.

[Tom4784]

Deleted Post

[arista]

[Conservative MP Caroline Nokes is sent
'rape threat' and branded a 'Tory w***e' after
accusing Boris Johnson's father Stanley
of slapping her bottom at 2003 party conference]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-bottom.html