[arista]

Hitler is not a good guy

As she sang with her Guitar


Good Piers Played some of it



Hitler is Pure Evil.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by arista

Hitler is not a good guy

As she sang with her Guitar


Good Piers Played some of it



Hitler is Pure Evil.

he was quite the guy back in the day

history has not been kind on him

like Barrymore

[Crimson Dynamo]

Youtube video

[arista]

Thanks, LT, for posting the Video

[Crimson Dynamo]

[arista]

https://twitter.com/pearlythingz/sta...44571194355712

[The Slim Reaper]

Tibb anti-Semitism experts when a real example exists...

[arista]

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by arista

I can say that in my experience there have definitely been women that have been better than me at certain things.

Basically she's not really on point with what she's saying.

[Oliver_W]

I remember I once saw a youtube video where some bloke was trying to make an argument that women shouldn't vote. He was speaking to a "panel" of two young women - I can't remember the names of anyone involved ( ) but he was using a cartoon avatar, and the two ladies both had long brown hair.
I thought they'd rip him a new one, but as he was talking they were nodding thoughtfully!

[arista]

[arista]

In Las Vegas

[user104658]

Pearl is quite blatantly a fraud who knows what to say to get outrage/attention. It's not even convincing. She's not a good actress.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Pearl is quite blatantly a fraud who knows what to say to get outrage/attention. It's not even convincing. She's not a good actress.

I look Forward
to her Live again
on 8PM Piers Morgan Live Show


And who he picks as the other side,
a Tough Female is needed.


But when they know it is Pearl
they may back out?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by arista

I look Forward

to her Live again

on 8PM Piers Morgan Live Show





And who he picks as the other side,

a Tough Female is needed.





But when they know it is Pearl

they may back out?

Why would anyone waste their breath arguing with a person who is clearly just trolling, though?

[arista]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Why would anyone waste their breath arguing with a person who is clearly just trolling, though?

It looks like trolling
but having a Nice Old
Fashioned viewpoint gets her, likes

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by arista

It looks like trolling
but having a Nice Old
Fashioned viewpoint gets her, likes

Oh you think it would be "nice" if women weren't allowed to Vote? Quelle surprise ........

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Pearl is quite blatantly a fraud who knows what to say to get outrage/attention. It's not even convincing. She's not a good actress.

Where as St Greta is definitely not a fraud and if you dare say anything negative about her then SB will come on and let you know how sad you are.

"It's ok when we do it"

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Alf

Where as St Greta is definitely not a fraud and if you dare say anything negative about her then SB will come on and let you know how sad you are.

"It's ok when we do it"

What imaginary land do you live in where I give a stuff about Greta Thunberg? .

I'll let you know how sad you are if you're making unrelated personal attacks on young women because yes that's a saddo thing for a middle aged individual to be spending their days doing.

I'll let you know that I think you're dumb as a sack of bricks if you spout nonsense-science and flat-earther conspiracy BS.

You're free to think that Greta is disingenuous though - which is all I've said about Pearl. She's grifting. She makes lots of money by pretending to be the world's biggest PickMe. Is she a "fraud"? only in the same way that people like Logan Paul or any other social media "notorious figure" is a fraud... they play a role for content engagement. That's it. I don't find Pearl's acting very convincing but that's also a valid and relevant personal opinion.

I think maybe her popularity/marketability is waning a bit because the Right Wing tide has turned on the likes of Tate, who she leaned heavily on in her content previously ... she seems to be grasping at straws a bit to try to stay relevant, but IMO it's having the opposite effect and people can just see what she's doing at this point.

I don't even blame her is the thing. If I could make a sack of cash being an alt-right shill I'd be marching through Washington DC in a red cap tomorrow morning .

[Crimson Dynamo]

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

What imaginary land do you live in where I give a stuff about Greta Thunberg? .

I'll let you know how sad you are if you're making unrelated personal attacks on young women because yes that's a saddo thing for a middle aged individual to be spending their days doing.

I'll let you know that I think you're dumb as a sack of bricks if you spout nonsense-science and flat-earther conspiracy BS.

You're free to think that Greta is disingenuous though - which is all I've said about Pearl. She's grifting. She makes lots of money by pretending to be the world's biggest PickMe. Is she a "fraud"? only in the same way that people like Logan Paul or any other social media "notorious figure" is a fraud... they play a role for content engagement. That's it. I don't find Pearl's acting very convincing but that's also a valid and relevant personal opinion.

I think maybe her popularity/marketability is waning a bit because the Right Wing tide has turned on the likes of Tate, who she leaned heavily on in her content previously ... she seems to be grasping at straws a bit to try to stay relevant, but IMO it's having the opposite effect and people can just see what she's doing at this point.

I don't even blame her is the thing. If I could make a sack of cash being an alt-right shill I'd be marching through Washington DC in a red cap tomorrow morning .

It’s a shame you don’t have that same honest opinion that bang on about when it comes to Meghan and Harry’s, another pair grifter’s who are also compulsive liars

Instead you crawl up their back sides with posts aimed at members who have been proven 100 per cent correc in their honest opinions of the pair

When an intelligent man like yourself continues to defend proven liars it’s you that loses all credibility.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It’s a shame you don’t have that same honest opinion that bang on about when it comes to Meghan and Harry’s, another pair grifter’s who are also compulsive liars

Instead you crawl up their back sides with posts aimed at members who have been proven 100 per cent correc in their honest opinions of the pair

When an intelligent man like yourself continues to defend proven liars it’s you that loses all credibility.

"Members who have been proven 100% correct" .

I provide a counter-balance to over-the-top, flag-humping royalists. It's not really been necessary since Liz died to be fair, because it turns out the Royalists were mainly Elizabeth Nostalgists ("Good Ol' Days" fans getting misty eyed about the 20th century) and they don't have much time for fat-fingered Chuck, noncey brothers, or Princes getting pegged by the maid. Doing my job for me.

[Mystic Mock]

Are we going back to the early 10's when trolling was seen as cool?

[arista]

She is Different
not a troll

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by arista

She is Different
not a troll

She's most certainly a troll, she doesn't live the way she preaches women should and she deliberately mis-represents stats even when she's been shown to know that they're wrong (eg. claiming more women are obese in the USA than men, someone actually proved to her that was a lie, she said she stood corrected but has still claimed that it was true on other interviews afterwards)