[Cherie]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

The 37 images probably is a cover up and we are just being given enough to jail him and protect all the other names involved...

There was a guy on LBC this morning with Nick and he was babbling on about Huw 'only' having a small amount of pics on his phone when you would normally find 1,000s....

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Cherie

There was a guy on LBC this morning with Nick and he was babbling on about Huw 'only' having a small amount of pics on his phone when you would normally find 1,000s....

They found them on a WhatsApp group on his phone so I reckon he's had another device with more (like I said, long gone sitting at the bottom of the Thames. Or literally burned.) but he's forgotten to make sure his messaging apps were clear. Probably deleted things not realising they could be recovered.

[Livia]

One image is one too many.

[GiRTh]

Disgraceful. I distinctly remember the word 'angry' being used regard how he felt. I recall many people sympathised at the time as they thought the charges weren't real

We need some prison time for him to show him a lesson

[bots]

he has pled guilty, obviously hoping for a light sentence

[Ammi]

…I would say that with the images apparently found, it would be difficult to plead any other way…I can’t imagine a legal representative taking on a not guilty plea with what’s unfolded…

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

he has pled guilty, obviously hoping for a light sentence

Yes could be his plan.

[Crimson Dynamo]

If found guilty, he could receive a maximum penalty of six months imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine.

[arista]

He has plead Guilty

[arista]

[Ammi]

Edwards was emotionless after pleading guilty to the charges and sat staring into the distance, with his head tilted slightly upwards.

In a statement, the Metropolitan Police said he was arrested in November last year and charged on June 26.

Edwards, who was one of the BBC’s most prominent and highest-paid news anchors before he left the corporation in April on medical grounds, could receive a maximum penalty of 10 years’ imprisonment.

During his career, he fronted BBC’s News At Ten for 20 years and anchored coverage of major national events including announcing Queen Elizabeth II’s death on the BBC and presenting coverage of her funeral.

…full article…
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b2588644.html

[arista]

[Ex-BBC star claims pictures of children aged between
seven and 14 'were sent to him by a paedophile'
on Whats]

Dirty Peado git


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ppearance.html

[arista]

[There were two moving images of a young child,
possibly aged between seven and nine years old,
according to prosecutors.]

Dirty Peado Git

https://news.sky.com/story/huw-edwar...ldren-13187776

[Cherie]

Grim

[arista]

A Camera/Reporter dropped his camera
in the scrum.

BBC reporter informed us.

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

Roll on Monday 16th of September

Jail him

[arista]

He was Arrested
while still being paid by the BBC.

So they will have Questions

Ref: Adam Boulton, Times Radio Live.

[arista]

Ch5HDnews stated
his WhatsApp had moving images of kids under the legal age

They must Jail him.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by arista

Ch5HDnews stated
his WhatsApp had moving images of kids under the legal age

They must Jail him.

He was sent them by a man on a what’s app chat

It’s worrying that if someone sends you a picture and you open it without even knowing its contents you are then guilty

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

He was sent them by a man on a what’s app chat

It’s worrying that if someone sends you a picture and you open it without even knowing its contents you are then guilty

They had been chatting previously they weren't discussing the weather

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

They had been chatting previously they weren't discussing the weather

Yes they had been exchanging pictures legal pictures obviously porn but legal
All the pictures and two moving images came from the man he was talking to.

It reads that he made the images but he is guilty because he opened the images

No other images were found on any of his other devices

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Yes they had been exchanging pictures legal pictures obviously porn but legal
All the pictures and two moving images came from the man he was talking to.

It reads that he made the images but he is guilty because he opened the images

No other images were found on any of his other devices

Yes he liked just legal however the underage ones were sent on separate occasions so he must have known what they were

He continued: 'In February 2021 a further five indecent images of children were sent to Mr Edwards (and) read or opened by him in the chat.

'The final indecent images of a child was sent in August 2021, it was a cat-A moving film which depicted a male child of younger age than virtually all of the other indecent images of children.


Surely after opening the first one you would ask the guy to stop he has a particular liking for teenage boys obviously

[Crimson Dynamo]

Was it a BBC phone?