[Vicky.]

Originally posted by AhmedFan2004

No I get this, and I've said he has bad flaws, but you're wiping under the carpet Siavash looking terrible tonight, 3-4 days prior eviction:

= Scheming exposed, trying to be 'Mr Nice guy', etc
= Public reminded of 'Cheating on GF' and 'Backstabbing Best Mate'
= Fiddling noms, braking rules every week, pretending he's out of the game but isn't.

So why pretend that he looked good? And again, Charlie is not up for eviction, so it's irrelevant.

And again, the chavs/public will side with him just like they did last time with Fred (And Fred left). But Charlie is as usual in the right; exposing truth.

Charlie brought up the Cheating on GF + Backstabbing Best Mate issue to bring Vash down. And the public is now reminded. Pwned.

The forum is biased and anti-Charlie, so even if he breathed you'd say he was wrong. Big wooop.

I never said he looked good. I said he looked the best out of them all (the ones who were arguing( as he stood his ground and refused to back down even when they tried the group 'attack' that they were so fond of earlier in the series



Charlie is as usual in the right...seriously, do you watch a different show to everyone else?!

[AhmedFan2004]

Originally posted by VickyJ
I never said he looked good. I said he looked the best out of them all (the ones who were arguing( as he stood his ground and refused to back down even when they tried the group 'attack' that they were so fond of earlier in the series

The general public and chavs and still some forumers will think that Vash is a scheming deceptive snake and are fully reminded of his cheating and backstabbing. You know this.

Charlie is as usual in the right...seriously, do you watch a different show to everyone else?!

He exposes the truth and states it for the public to see, even if it is part of his gameplan. And it works. Everyone knows that Freddie, and now Vash, are schemers and fakers. And he exposes them and brings them down. And he can't be faulted for it really, because it's Fred/Vash that are scheming, etc.

And the public are reminded, 3-4 days prior eviction, of Siavash cheating on his GF and backstabbing Marcus. Vash got pwned.

Nobody cares about Charlie getting angry outside the forum. Girls think it's 'cute'.

[setanta]

What on earth will you two do when it's over and you have nothing left to argue about? ha ha

[tintedshadow]

Originally posted by setanta

He's not all that and he's arrogant to boot. All I can say is god love you darling. I would show you a picture of myself in the hope I could wean you off this terrible affliction you're suffering from but I'd worry that you'd spontaneously combust or something and I couldn't have that on my conscience!! Ha ha

lol joker... dude forget siavash,i just saw kazaane on that thread damn its just a shame i already made a play for margery fan

[AhmedFan2004]

Originally posted by setanta
What on earth will you two do when it's over and you have nothing left to argue about? ha ha

Vicky will be partying with Charlie when he goes back up to Newcastle with the 100k cheque.

[MissKittyFantastico]

Originally posted by setanta

Wow, thanks for the link. Really interesting to see peoples faces cuz sometimes this can be quite a cold experience and you tend to forget that there's real people here with real lives, you know? I'm an artist so I love to observe faces.... can learn a great deal from them. Really thanks.

Yes thanks for that link Gypsy! Always nice to put faces to names!

You look exactly how I imagined you to look btw!

[setanta]

Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico

Yes thanks for that link Gypsy! Always nice to put faces to names!

You look exactly how I imagined you to look btw!

Gypsy is there? I didn't see her... what page?

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by AhmedFan2004

Vicky will be partying with Charlie when he goes back up to Newcastle with the 100k cheque.

Not likely...I will be standing back watching him be bitchslapped a few times though no doubt.

I very much doubt he will be able to come out up here for a while, til it all calms down.

[GypsyGoth]

Originally posted by setanta
Gypsy is there? I didn't see her... what page?

I'm on page 7 of 9 (for me). Posted on 20-8-2009 at 03:18 AM. (Have been told I look like a boy by some here).

[AhmedFan2004]

Originally posted by VickyJ

I very much doubt he will be able to come out up here for a while, til it all calms down.

Ohhh well he can always come to my house, my mum and sis love him, lol. My mum was laughing at Nana when she watched the LF I recorded from last night, today. I'm being serious, lol.

[setanta]

Originally posted by GypsyGoth

I'm on page 7 of 9 (for me). Posted on 20-8-2009 at 03:18 AM. (Have been told I look like a boy by some here).

Don't be listening to those ejits. You look great.... wonderfully shaped eyes.... very thoughtful and penetrative stare.

[setanta]

Originally posted by AhmedFan2004

Ohhh well he can always come to my house, my mum and sis love him, lol. My mum was laughing at Nana when she watched the LF I recorded from last night, today. I'm being serious, lol.

As much as I agree with you on Siavash I have to disagree with you here.... the guys a class A muppet. Sorry.

[MissKittyFantastico]

Originally posted by GypsyGoth

I'm on page 7 of 9 (for me). Posted on 20-8-2009 at 03:18 AM. (Have been told I look like a boy by some here).

You don't look like a boy at all, and you've got lovely eyes!

[idontknow]

nothing really to explain, he said himself, he just didnt want it to be just him and marcus as he likes marcus and didnt want to be up against one of his favourite people in the house

[kisywisy]

what bothers me is what someone said earlier on in this thread. siavash claims he's not intereested in the gam, but he's constantly thinking about nominations etc. it screams fake to me!!

i really really hate the no nomination thing. i really do. noone likes nominating, but they all do it. it's not bb without the nominations. i don't want all the hm up every week. it's not the fair way to do it. it's bloody boring. there's no build up to who's going up. no villans or contravertial hm would be left by halfway and you'd be left with boring ****ers by the end.

i don't hate siavash but i really REALLY hate what he's been doing the last few weeks and i can't get past that. i really don't like marcus but i've voting out siavash

[tintedshadow]

Originally posted by AhmedFan2004

But that wouldn't look cool on TV, tactically voting to put David up and save himself. Especially after weeks of not wanting a free ride. So he couldn't really do this, in terms of public rep, and didn't ...

They'd gladly obey his request. They nommed him without request. Charlie even said that he should have done this, as per Marcus. Marcus did it no probs. Nobody ever battered an eyelid.

this is what you dont seem to get,they "nommed" him but he wasnt sure this was how they would vote,usually you have an idea that sophie would vote marcus or whatever,but no one really let on that they would nominate siavash.. all he wanted was to be up this week,he figured not nominating would give him the chance to do so,charlies not up so it shouldnt matter to him anyway..

all that happened is siavash made a decision that others wernt happy with so they all took turns ripping chunks out of him,although in hindsight he should have just wasted his noms on people he knew wouldnt be up therefore getting the same result,and probably would have saved him from tonights grilling..

[GypsyGoth]

Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
You don't look like a boy at all, and you've got lovely eyes!

Thank you Kitty

[kisywisy]

Originally posted by idontknow
nothing really to explain, he said himself, he just didnt want it to be just him and marcus as he likes marcus and didnt want to be up against one of his favourite people in the house

but that's not up to him to decide!! it's up the the house as a whole, not sir siavash. he's trying to control the nomination results and that's ****ed up. he shouldn't have that power. he should have been chucked out the first time he refused

[tintedshadow]

Originally posted by kisywisy
what bothers me is what someone said earlier on in this thread. siavash claims he's not intereested in the gam, but he's constantly thinking about nominations etc. it screams fake to me!!

i really really hate the no nomination thing. i really do. noone likes nominating, but they all do it. it's not bb without the nominations. i don't want all the hm up every week. it's not the fair way to do it. it's bloody boring. there's no build up to who's going up. no villans or contravertial hm would be left by halfway and you'd be left with boring ****ers by the end.

i don't hate siavash but i really REALLY hate what he's been doing the last few weeks and i can't get past that. i really don't like marcus but i've voting out siavash

surely siavash isnt the only one?marcus/freddie and lisa's clique did much the same scheming,i do find siavash's rants a little tedios at times,like hes talking in riddles but its been explained by those who leave the house,that with nothing else to do,your mind does tend to revert back to the game..

if charlie had a go at marcus for all his game planning and refusals to nominate then i would see his point,or even had a word with sophie,but he never raised anything with them,thats why i personally think siavash has every right to not nominate,just as the rest never got called out for their actions,why should siavash..

[AhmedFan2004]

Originally posted by tintedshadow
this is what you dont seem to get,they "nommed" him but he wasnt sure this was how they would vote,usually you have an idea that sophie would vote marcus or whatever,but no one really let on that they would nominate siavash.. all he wanted was to be up this week,he figured not nominating would give him the chance to do so,charlies not up so it shouldnt matter to him anyway..

all that happened is siavash made a decision that others wernt happy with so they all took turns ripping chunks out of him,although in hindsight he should have just wasted his noms on people he knew wouldnt be up therefore getting the same result,and probably would have saved him from tonights grilling..

He wasn't sure of anything but he had made calculations. He asked Marcus prior to heading into the DR, who he nominated. He had calculated figures in his head ... so had a good idea.

And yes, they weren't happy because it was part of his scheming. To be up for eviction, but to look heroic doing it, and ultimately for David to be used as a safety net as it's a 3-way.

As the thread title implies, he clearly wasn't prepared for a 1 vs 1 eviction. And even if it was to save Marcus incase Marcus got evicted, that's still trying to fix a result and using David as the safety net.

Btw, I think the above is very unlikely - Siavash cares only about himself. He ain't loyal.

[AhmedFan2004]

Originally posted by kisywisy
but that's not up to him to decide!! it's up the the house as a whole, not sir siavash. he's trying to control the nomination results and that's ****** up. he shouldn't have that power. he should have been chucked out the first time he refused

He's fixing the noms to get an end result. A 3-way eviction. 'Perfect' ...

Just to look like a hero for putting himself up (but survive eviction anyway, David goes in his mind). Or, loyally 'save' Marcus from possible eviction in a 1 vs 1 against Vash (doubt Vash would care if Marcus went, but he'd be scared if it was just these 2 up!)

A 2-way eviction of Marcus vs Vash doesn't suit him (He goes, or Marcus goes)

A 2 way eviction of David vs Marcus doesn't suit him (He looks bad for putting Dave up and contradicting his 'no free rides, put me up' BS)

Poor David is the safety net being toyed with tactically.

[tintedshadow]

Originally posted by AhmedFan2004

He wasn't sure of anything but he had made calculations. He asked Marcus prior to heading into the DR, who he nominated. He had calculated figures in his head ... so had a good idea.

And yes, they weren't happy because it was part of his scheming. To be up for eviction, but to look heroic doing it, and ultimately for David to be used as a safety net as it's a 3-way.

As the thread title implies, he clearly wasn't prepared for a 1 vs 1 eviction. And even if it was to save Marcus incase Marcus got evicted, that's still trying to fix a result and using David as the safety net.

Btw, I think the above is very unlikely - Siavash cares only about himself. He ain't loyal.

okay,once more ill break it down for you brother,when bea/david/marcus were up it was obvios marcus wasnt going,so when david stayed siavash figured david would be up again (for the same reasons he was up the first time,like with freddie being up on numerous occasions) so..siavash asked who marcus was nominating,had a fair idea of who may be up,so he wanted himself to be up so he made sure his nominations wernt counted,by not nominating.. as i have said before,he is not the only one to do this,so its not one rule for everyone,this is my issue..

furthermore i think its safe to say,most of those housemates only care for themselves so im not sure what your point was meant to be,but he did say to sophie he would rather marcus win so im not sure why you think he's not loyal,or for that matter why that is even rellevant to this topic..

[AhmedFan2004]

I agree with you tintedshadow, spot on. Our posts don't conflict.

But I was just stating for the record, I doubt he avoided the 1 vs 1 eviction with Marcus due to 'loyalty'. Like you said, they are all hungry and in it for themselves. Especially Vash.

[kisywisy]

Originally posted by tintedshadow

surely siavash isnt the only one?marcus/freddie and lisa's clique did much the same scheming,i do find siavash's rants a little tedios at times,like hes talking in riddles but its been explained by those who leave the house,that with nothing else to do,your mind does tend to revert back to the game..

if charlie had a go at marcus for all his game planning and refusals to nominate then i would see his point,or even had a word with sophie,but he never raised anything with them,thats why i personally think siavash has every right to not nominate,just as the rest never got called out for their actions,why should siavash..

because it's siavash that started the whole non nomination thing and his reasons are pathetic and fake

[kisywisy]

can i also just say that if he knew that by not nominating he'd be giving sophie and charlie a nomination, WHY didn't he just nominate them??? it makes no sense at all