[Vicky.]

Should have got the same sentence the accused would have got had he been convicted.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Should have got the same sentence the accused would have got had he been convicted.

I agree.

[Livia]

The judge described her as "a highly intelligent, well-educated young woman". She framed an innocent bloke she'd willingly had sex with and didn't think for one minute about the trail of email and other electronic exchanges that would show her to be the liar and the fraud that she is. Yeah, she's a real genius.

I hope he takes up a civil case against her now and sues her for as much as he can get.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Should have got the same sentence the accused would have got had he been convicted.

I totally agree with you on that too Vicky.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by lostalex

well i don't think sexist terms are appropriate for the actions of ONE person who happens to be female.

If this was a black person, would it be appropriate to use racist slurs?

To be honest, Alex, I honestly don't know what your problem is. I gave a very well-argued case, to which, by the way, you didn't even reply. I just find it very sad and patheic that you have to resort to throwing abuse at me for being sexist, as Pyramid says. How can I be sexist when I have a mum and a girlfriend? All I said about the woman wasn't intended to be sexist - stop taking things out of context and looking for an argument, because if you're looking for an argument I'll give you one and you will probably look for some sort of label to throw at me to cover up why you couldn't reply the rest of my post. I haven't been given and infraction or warning or ban, so if the moderators (rightly) didn't take offense to it, why are you? Anyway, wasted enough time on you. Get out of my face, please.