[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Well you fairly refuted jets opinion there.

Petty name calling over Meghan's career is not an opinion.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Don't people constantly personally criticise politicians they don't know personally???

[Swan]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Don't people constantly personally criticise politicians they don't know personally???

Only the ones they don't like. No hypocrisy whatsoever.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Don't people constantly personally criticise politicians they don't know personally???

Originally Posted by Swan

Only the ones they don't like. No hypocrisy whatsoever.

This has to be the worst comparison made yet.

Criticising a politicians actual work, which you know is in the public interest.

Versus, pretending to know the intimate details of a couple's marriage that you've never met in your life and presuming you know them better than they know themselves.

Yeah, good one.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

This has to be the worst comparison made yet.

Criticising a politicians actual work, which you know is in the public interest.

Versus, pretending to know the intimate details of a couple's marriage that you've never met in your life and presuming you know them better than they know themselves.

Yeah, good one.

I've never said i pretend to know harry and megan. Im pretty sure no one else here knows them on a personal level either. People in the public eye, and as hypocritical as they've been, im not sure why it shocks people that others will question their ACTUAL motives?!

They say one thing, they do another.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Swan

I've never said i pretend to know harry and megan.

The thread isn't about you.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Swan

I've never said i pretend to know harry and megan. Im pretty sure no one else here knows them on a personal level either. People in the public eye, and as hypocritical as they've been, im not sure why it shocks people that others will question their ACTUAL motives?!

They say one thing, they do another.

Good strong post Swan. I agree. I am sure the GBP think this way

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Swan

I've never said i pretend to know harry and megan. Im pretty sure no one else here knows them on a personal level either.

Exactly...no one has. It’s just a cheap accusation to disrupt debate

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

This has to be the worst comparison made yet.

Criticising a politicians actual work, which you know is in the public interest.

Versus, pretending to know the intimate details of a couple's marriage that you've never met in your life and presuming you know them better than they know themselves.

Yeah, good one.

Now that's really spot on.

I attack politicians, some I know some I don't.
For their policies, not personally.
Not criticising their choice of dress.
I don't even criticise them,( for those that have it ) ,wealth.

Whether I like them or not.

It's their deceit in their policies, lack of compassion and also if they are heaving burdens on others rather than relieving burdens on others, that's what I attack them on.

Not personally.
Certainly not anyone I didn't know and who I'd had no interaction with myself.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Now that's really spot on.

I attack politicians, some I know some I don't.
For their policies, not personally.
Not criticising their choice of dress.
I don't even criticise them,( for those that have it ) ,wealth.

Whether I like them or not.

It's their deceit in their policies, lack of compassion and also if they are heaving burdens on others rather than relieving burdens on others, that's what I attack them on.

Not personally.
Certainly not anyone I didn't know and who I'd had no interaction with myself.

Exactly Joey. Spot on.

[Crimson Dynamo]

You could not make it up

[Crimson Dynamo]

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal...-Family-latest

[AnnieK]

To be fair...every single one of these threads ends up closed. Jet posts his thoughts, his friends come in to post or . Someone refutes it... then gets accused of calling Jet obsessed, then it gets personal and thread closed. Its so boringly predictable. As much as Meghan fans need to see that people are not all going to like her, her detractors need to accept that not everyone has the same views.

This all started tonight because someone had an opinion that Jet disagreed with....not 12 hours after his previous post (that was late at night) and that poster was accused of "poking"

Ludicrous

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

To be fair...every single one of these threads ends up closed. Jet posts his thoughts, his friends come in to post or . Someone refutes it... then gets accused of calling Jet obsessed, then it gets personal and thread closed. Its so boringly predictable. As much as Meghan fans need to see that people are not all going to like her, her detractors need to accept that not everyone has the same views.

This all started tonight because someone had an opinion that Jet disagreed with....not 12 hours after his previous post (that was late at night) and that poster was accused of "poking"

Ludicrous

In all honesty, I doubt there's many Meghan fans on this forum. I doubt she would even be discussed that much without the amount of vitriol towards her, it's less about being a fan of Meghan and more about opposing the strange and, quite frankly, worrying level of hatred people have towards her, even more so when it's clear in the press coverage that it's motivated by racism. Kate could hold her pregnant belly and be called glowing and effervescent, Meghan got snapped holding her belly and they accused her of attention seeking. The hatred towards her in the press and in the public in general is obviously motivated by pure bigotry.

People are free to dislike anyone but the level of hatred an ex-royal gets is just bizarre. It's no wonder why Harry wanted out.

I'm also tired of these pure cheerleading responses. You can agree with people but a post that exists purely to brigade your friends' post is just grim. A person can agree with anyone all they want but they really should add something to the conversation. Posting in a thread just to back up your friend's posts is just pointless.

[thesheriff443]

Over and over the use of the word hatred which is directed at one member if this is not dealt with I’m going to report this site.

You are letting dezzy gets away with abuse.

[Marsh.]

It is. Joey can't post an opinion without being accused of "poking" and called a "Meghan admirer".

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It is. Joey can't post an opinion without being accused of "poking" and called a "Meghan admirer".

Still waiting for those PM's Marsh?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Swan

Still waiting for those PM's Marsh?

Don’t hold your breath

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Swan

Still waiting for those PM's Marsh?

You can ask a mod to confirm that you haven’t sent pms to Marsh if that is the case

[Cherie]

Of course Harry and Meghan can be discussed it’s not like they shy away from regularly airing their views

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It is. Joey can't post an opinion without being accused of "poking" and called a "Meghan admirer".

It works both ways and you know it...how many times have we been called Meghan HATERS ..the put downs from quoting the Daily Mail etc...stop being a hypocrite.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

It works both ways and you know it...how many times have we been called Meghan HATERS ..the put downs from quoting the Daily Mail etc...stop being a hypocrite.

I haven't called anyone "Meghan HATERS".

Nor is there anything wrong with pointing out what a gutter rag the Daily Mail is.
Insulting tabloids and Daily Mail articles that are routinely posted is not personal, no matter how much you feel it is.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I haven't called anyone "Meghan HATERS".

Nor is there anything wrong with pointing out what a gutter rag the Daily Mail is.
Insulting tabloids and Daily Mail articles that are routinely posted is not personal, no matter how much you feel it is.

You constantly call out Jet for getting ALL his material from the Dailymail...when in fact he gets most of it from other sources which you choose to ignore...but hey ho..

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I haven't called anyone "Meghan HATERS".

I didn’t say YOU did...but others do.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I didn’t say YOU did...but others do.

You called my a hypocrite because you've been called a Meghan Hater. Sit down.