[Beso]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Boomers have been adults for a lot longer and they still confuse themselves with the generation that came before, they haven't grown up from being entitled brats.

You are on about people who were sons of fathers, who's fathers were absent, or present. Very brutal words, especially after what they had to endure.


A few years, what felt like a lifetime, in the trenches of Belgium. A man thrust home into the world of a young child and a LOVING wife, after years of MYSERERY, alone but not alone in a foreign field.

The life of a young boomer comes in many guises dezzy, perhaps look at their upbringing, their mental health issues before being so dismissive.


Or just say the usual, **** their mental health issues though eh!!

[Beso]

Originally Posted by All The Jingle Ladies

Until Harry accepts a drunk driver killed his mother and not "the meedjaaar" I fear he cannot move along and will be stuck in this toxic dependant relationship

Let's see how his court case goes.

[jet]

Originally Posted by MissyToes

Harry was punching the air when he met Meghan…couldn’t believe his luck. Completely mesmerised by her and has been her lapdog ever since.

Yep, and when Harry met Meghan it could have been more a case of strategic planning on her part than luck...

Meghan’s long time best friend Misha Nonoo’s husband was a close friend of Harry’s and she was the one thought to set them up on the blind date. Meghan was a member of Soho House and was close to Soho’s consultant Markus Anderson who also knew Harry well. Princess Eugenie frequented Soho House and Meghan befriended her through Markus.

Yet Meghan, who already knew these people who were friends with Harry (one of them for years, in Misha’s husband) and who was in London ‘looking for a famous English guy to date’ (her own words) said in the engagement interview that she didn’t know anything about Harry and didn’t even google him before their blind date but just wanted to know ‘was he kind’.
Well now, the mind does boggle.

[jet]

The Telegraph

Laws could be changed to protect press freedoms following Meghan, Duchess of Sussex's legal victory

Downing Street has hinted at introducing new safeguards to protect the freedom of the press, in the wake of the Duchess of Sussex’s legal victory over the Mail on Sunday.
The Government would “study the implications” of the Court of Appeal decision in the case “carefully”, a spokesman for Boris Johnson announced on Friday...

…..Politicians, lawyers and campaigners raised concerns in the wake of the latest judgment that the courts are interpreting the law in a way that extends privacy rights beyond what was intended by Parliament.
John Whittingdale, the former Tory culture secretary, accused judges of creating far-reaching privacy laws without parliamentary scrutiny, branding it a “matter of great concern”.
Geoffrey Robertson QC, the leading human rights barrister, said earlier this week: “Privacy is now a growth industry. The law has been developed – in fact, created – by judges. But instead of applying a presumption in favour of free speech, they purport to ‘balance’ it with often over-valued reputations of rich and famous litigants.”.....etc