| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Soaps Discuss Eastenders, Coronation Street and the rest of the soaps in this sub-forum. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1151 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Oh shut up. Just shut up.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#1152 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#1153 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#1155 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
http://www.digitalspy.com/soaps/east...ecret-exposed/
"A week of revelations" That was the tag for Live Week, that's DTC's turf SOCK lay d'FUQ OFF!
|
||
|
|
|
|
#1157 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#1161 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Who else do you see leaving under SOC?
I can't see Whitney sticking around without Lee... she has no one and the Carters will kick her out (like they did with Cora) I think it's obvious Jack is leaving too |
|||
|
|
|
|
#1162 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
In saying that, if he axes Whitney I'm going to make sure he never works again
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#1163 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
If Jack's leaving because of Ronnie, then that pattern should generally follow through with Whitney as well
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#1165 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
If he's axing Jack too I will never understand why he wasn't killed to facilitate the sisters leaving. Killing them was a waste and the more of this non existent story that unfolds the more it becomes apparent.
Shirley doesn't give a crap and we've barely seen Phil. |
||
|
|
|
|
#1166 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#1170 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Something along the lines of if Glenda controlled Roxy's cocaine habit then Roxy wouldn't have drowned and Ronnie wouldn't have needed to save her and drowned as well.
Last edited by Ashley.; 07-01-2017 at 02:33 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#1171 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Tbf didn't Glenda literally show up the night before the wedding?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#1172 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
There was perfectly other good ways they could have left whilst keeping in tone with the 'sisters forever' thing that SOC has seemed to suggest. Jack could have died as you say and Roxy could have gotten herself and Ronnie's acts together, took the reigns and taken them all away from Walford. Jack could have cheated and they could have somehow fleeced him out of everything he had and left him with nothing on the Square whilst they drove off for a better life. Those are two exit story lines I've thought of in 30 seconds. But no, let's have them both die like in the Final Destination films because they weren't created before 2000. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#1173 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I love it. Leaving Ricky with Sharon and Phil of course, they're not being lumbered with Sam's brat.
Last edited by Marsh.; 07-01-2017 at 11:09 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#1174 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
I just can't get my head around the thought process of 'We're getting rid of Ronnie, Roxy and Jack so we'll have Ronnie and Roxy die so Jack can leave Walford for a happy ending'. But, as Adam would say, they're dead and I should get over it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#1175 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Ignore Adam. I'll axe him from this ****ing thread if he carries on!
|
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|