[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Cal.

What good can come from keeping this tramp breathing?

Just heard on the radio she’s refusing to attend her own sentencing. Drag her there kicking and screaming! Those families deserve to watch her face justice.

Indeed. Since when are you allowed to not show up to your own murder trial anyway? Wtf

[arista]

Tomorrow
Monday the Judge,
gives that Murder Women
her sentence.

She will not be in court for that.

[bots]

you can be tried in your absence, so there is no legal requirement to attend any of the trial

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[FaLaLaLand]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

you can be tried in your absence, so there is no legal requirement to attend any of the trial

And it's absolutely ridiculous. If you're in court for a serious crime especially, you should be there in person to face the consequences.

They should drag her to that dock whether she likes it or not. Makes my blood boil how we're so lenient with criminals, in particular monsters like this one.

[ChristmasNeeve]

Wow this is awful, imagine some of these babies could still be alive if the hospital hadn't tried to brush it under the carpet. I hope they get sued to **** by the parents

[bots]

the impact statements from the bereaved and affected is over whelming

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

the impact statements from the bereaved and affected is over whelming

I don't understand how she's allowed to stay away, she should be forced to listen to that (not that it would even effect her, if she's someone who's capable murdering those helpless little babies in the first place)

[bots]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I don't understand how she's allowed to stay away, she should be forced to listen to that (not that it would even effect her, if she's someone who's capable murdering those helpless little babies in the first place)

in a way, it will get her the maximum sentence possible, because she is trying to control events of the trial, and the judge wont look leniently on that

[arista]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I don't understand how she's allowed to stay away, she should be forced to listen to that (not that it would even effect her, if she's someone who's capable murdering those helpless little babies in the first place)

PM Sunak
could have brought a Law in
it would have taken 2 days
in Parliament
and would have the backing of MP's


PM Sunak is at fault.

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

in a way, it will get her the maximum sentence possible, because she is trying to control events of the trial, and the judge wont look leniently on that

I hope so. She should never be let out. She should be sentenced separately for each baby she killed

[user104658]

The thing is legally its basically impossible to make attendance mandatory without also making it necessary - if that makes sense. So if you make it that the criminal can't choose to be absent from the legal process, you also make it that if the criminal CANNOT attend in person (e.g. poor health or simply too dangerous/volatile) then the trial and/or sentencing has to be delayed indefinitely.

In terms of a trade off, it's better to have it non-compulsory.

Also the perceived benefit to family can end up actually being harmful, because what they're looking for is that catharsis of seeing the perpetrator being broken/devastated when sentenced but often they don't get that. Often met with someone who is dissociating (totally blank) or unrepentant and even mocking/taunting.

[arista]

This Judge
has finally getting to the sentence


Whole Life in Prison
She is to die in prison

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by arista

This Judge
has finally getting to the sentence


Whole Life in Prison
She is to die in prison

Sooner rather than later , hopefully

They got to that other monster Peter Sutcliffe eventually


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by arista

This Judge
has finally getting to the sentence


Whole Life in Prison
She is to die in prison

Good news

[bots]

in 10 years, the prison service will say she is a model prisoner and that she regrets her actions and they will let her out

[The Slim Reaper]

Life in prison is the only sensible sentence. The state shouldn't be killing people, even if they are guilty of the most heinous of crimes.

[Candy Annie Cane]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

the impact statements from the bereaved and affected is over whelming

I had to stop reading them....it was heartbreaking to read, how they have lived through it is beyond me. I don't agree with the death penalty but there is a few exceptions I would make

[Christmas Dynasnow]

she should be shot in the back of her head and her body burned

[Tinsel Toes]

No doubt she'll appeal ~ i think no show for sentencing should cancel any grounds for appeal for this evil woman.

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Life in prison is the only sensible sentence. The state shouldn't be killing people, even if they are guilty of the most heinous of crimes.

I agree but I think for cases where multiple crimes were committed like in this case, they should get a sentence for each crime and those sentences should run back to back not at the same time

[Urban Cragou]

I have no words.

[Gusto Brunt]

It's crazy we have a law that says a convicted killer decides to attend court or not.

Madness.

I was spitting feathers when the Judge was talking 'to her' in her absence. Her choice. Who the fook does she think she is!