[joeysteele]

Well I rarely refer to her sex.
I call her Widdecombe or an individual.

She warrants the venom she gets for the venom she spouts out.

However, I'll ensure I don't refer to the sex of the individual Widdecombe again.

However Widdecombe can get veiled defence for saying 2 females shouldn't be allowed to dance together on a TV show, and that in a general sense Widdecombe says, families don't want to see that either.

For goodness sake.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Well I rarely refer to her sex.
I call her Widdecombe or an individual.

She warrants the venom she gets for the venom she spouts out.

However, I'll ensure I don't refer to the sex of the individual Widdecombe again.

Originally Posted by joeysteele

However Widdecombe can get veiled defence for saying 2 females shouldn't be allowed to dance together on a TV show, and that in a general sense Widdecombe says, families don't want to see that either.

For goodness sake.

Certainly wasn't my intention to defend her, out-rightly or veiled. I am most definitely condemning her comments and disagree with them wholeheartedly

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Certainly wasn't my intention to defend her, out-rightly or veiled. I am most definitely condemning her comments and disagree with them wholeheartedly

At no point did it come across as you defending her comments Niamh, rest assured

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Not those ones no, hag was one though which is a popular sexist slur for women over probably 30 at this stage

Seems a bit overly sensitive but for you, I'd take it back, she's not a hag, she's just an all round rotten dickhead.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Seems a bit overly sensitive but for you, I'd take it back, she's not a hag, she's just an all round rotten dickhead.

that's a fair analysis