[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Tbh it should have been a suspended sentence.

No way was what she did bad enough to warrant jail time.

Yes I agree. She did not deserve to go to jail. I hope she uses and wins.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

Thats Fine


But should she have served less time
for her 12 year old daughter's sake

Absolutely not.
In my view, she shouldnt likely be out now.
She doesn't appear to have learned anything.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I've absolutely no time for this woman whatsoever.
Not one scrap.

She's definitely giving off a bad vibe associating herself with Dan Wootton.

[arista]

[Good King Glennceslas]

What is the moron suing for exactly? She pleaded guilty.

Awful woman

[Christmas Dynasnow]

🚨BREAKING: Lucy Connolly will meet with Trump White House officials to reveal truth about her case and lack of free speech in UK.

[Good King Glennceslas]

[arista]

She has given an interview in the Telegraph
Good, she deleted her tweet

Which is better than what Online Only Dan
can give

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

She has given an interview in the Telegraph
Good, she deleted her tweet

Which is better than what Online Only Dan
can give

Actually no, I disagree.

What would have been good from her would have been to have considered her family FIRST and rather than have to delete a post she voluntary and planned to post, to have actually never posted such a worded post in the first place.

Because of that I have not a scrap of sympathy for her or liking of her, for the vile and despicable wording she used in her post.
What she stands for from her own inner prejudice.

It should be of no surprise that a creep like Dan Wootton would be supportive of her.

[arista]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Actually no, I disagree.

What would have been good from her would have been to have considered her family FIRST and rather than have to delete a post she voluntary and planned to post, to have actually never posted such a worded post in the first place.

Because of that I have not a scrap of sympathy for her or liking of her, for the vile and despicable wording she used in her post.
What she stands for from her own inner prejudice.

It should be of no surprise that a creep like Dan Wootton would be supportive of her.

Of course.

But she is in today's Respected Telegraph newspaper


A moment of madness to post on Twitter.


You had the wrong info at that time.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

Of course.

But she is in today's Respected Telegraph newspaper


A moment of madness to post on Twitter.


You had the wrong info at that time.

oh come on, respected Telegraph publication.

It's one of the most ridiculously biased publications ever and particularly against any government that's not Conservative.
Why people waste in excess of £500 yearly buying it astounds me, they must have money to burn.

Of course it will give her a platform, hardly a surprise.
I'm surprised it wasn't the Daily Mail actually.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Lucy and Ray, happier times

[Parmy]

Ignoring the government's tyranny because you dont like a person is only good for the tyranny to continue unabated.

[arista]

[Parmy]

Wasn't she considering her dead child and how the nhs was complicit in its death when she made the tweet.

A natural action from a mother already let down by the state as she watches the Southport attack on all those other children that were also let down by the state, who had that evil bastard on its watchlists.

[arista]

"oh come on, respected Telegraph publication"


They have more respect than Online Only Dan

It's what I Say

[Christmas Dynasnow]

But Mrs Connolly said Mr Jones, who had walked free from court, had rightly
not deserved to go to jail either. She said: “I’m pleased that the justice system
did work for Ricky Jones and I’m glad that he was able to get bail and he was
able to get good legal advice and have time to stop and think about how he was
going to plead. I wasn’t given that luxury.

“I don’t advocate that we should be throwing anyone in jail for saying…
something that he shouldn’t have done. It was silly. Does it really make him a
criminal? Should we be putting people like him and I in prison? Absolutely not.”

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

But Mrs Connolly said Mr Jones, who had walked free from court, had rightly
not deserved to go to jail either. She said: “I’m pleased that the justice system
did work for Ricky Jones and I’m glad that he was able to get bail and he was
able to get good legal advice and have time to stop and think about how he was
going to plead. I wasn’t given that luxury.

“I don’t advocate that we should be throwing anyone in jail for saying…
something that he shouldn’t have done. It was silly. Does it really make him a
criminal? Should we be putting people like him and I in prison? Absolutely not.”

Very gracious of her, he had plenty time to get good counsel, she was railroaded in and probably told she would get off as she had no previous if she pleaded guilty which would be the norm, look at the Welsh guy who choked and kicked his girlfriend, no previous was taken into account and a suspended sentence handed out, she was definately made an example of.... and it was criminal to take away a mother from her child for that length of time, they could have given her 6 weeks it would still have had the same impact, I wish her well, I think she will make alot of money off the back of her dubious celebrity

[joeysteele]

Men got 4 YEARS for chopping a tree down.

This woman got far less for posting it was acceptable to burn human beings alive in a building, from her prejudice against those people.

Yet she gets support.
That really speaks volumes that this Country is really going into dangerously ugly prejudiced depths.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Men got 4 YEARS for chopping a tree down.

Disgusting act of vandalism and destroying an iconic part of Northern England. Should have gotten longer.

What they did caused actual, material, real world damage. They didn't write some mean words (which were soon deleted).

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Men got 4 YEARS for chopping a tree down.

This woman got far less for posting it was acceptable to burn human beings alive in a building, from her prejudice against those people.

Yet she gets support.
That really speaks volumes that this Country is really going into dangerously ugly prejudiced depths.

People got 4 years for chopping a tree down, are you serious?

That's more than what some rapists get.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

People got 4 years for chopping a tree down, are you serious?

That's more than what some rapists get.

The problem there is how little the legsl system regards rape victims.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

The problem there is how little the legsl system regards rape victims.

Too true.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

People got 4 years for chopping a tree down, are you serious?

That's more than what some rapists get.

No they did not just chop a tree down

That is both silly and trying to deflect for nefarious reasons

A very poorly put tactic

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

No they did not just chop a tree down

That is both silly and trying to deflect for nefarious reasons

A very poorly put tactic

But if I remember correctly, weren't the Tree dying anyway?