[Livia]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Is this some sort of Quote off?

Oh yeah... I have Google, I can keep this up for weeks!

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Livia

Oh yeah... I have Google, I can keep this up for weeks!

''Oh yeah... I have Google'' - You MEAN; ''Oh yeah... I have Google TOO''

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Is this some sort of Quote off?

No it's Liv derailing my thread, ban her.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Is this some sort of Quote off?

[Livia]

Disagreeing with you is not derailing!

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Livia

Disagreeing with you is not derailing!

How about you comment on my thread topic and not obsess about my sig (again)

[Cherie]

Personally I think Nicola S helped lose Labour, her very public badgering of Ed to join forces to keep the Tories out remained in my mind and probably many others long after the debates finished. The Scots are not the only ones who voted with Nationalistic pride

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Personally I think Nicola S helped lose Labour, her very public badgering of Ed to join forces to keep the Tories out remained in my mind and probably many others long after the debates finished. The Scots are not the only ones who voted with Nationalistic pride

I agree I was just chatting to Livia about it on another thread. Brands response was pretty muted, surprised about that if I'm honest :/

[kirklancaster]

[QUOTE=Cherie;7747743]Personally I think Nicola S helped lose Labour, her very public badgering of Ed to join forces to keep the Tories out remained in my mind and probably many others long after the debates finished. The Scots are not the only ones who voted with Nationalistic pride[/QUOTE]

True - I have no fear of Ed Milliband but the SNP is a whole different ballgame.

[Kizzy]

I also have you tube... it's where I find these videos. where I get my information is very interesting.

[Crimson Dynamo]

looking back the whole Brand thing was an utter fiasco and in years to come will be used as an example of what not to do..

[Kizzy]

Do you think, politicians shouldn't attempt to address the concerns of the disenfranchised then?
Hmmmmm radical.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Do you think, politicians shouldn't attempt to address the concerns of the disenfranchised then?
Hmmmmm radical.

But Brand is NOT a politician.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

But Brand is NOT a politician.

Ed is... and he was canvassing the spokesperson for the electorate who are too apathetic to see why voting is a necessity for the greater good ( in this case, in my opinion)
If he inflenced one person to vote, or be engaged socially and or politically isn't that the job of a good politician?

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Ed is... and he was canvassing the spokesperson for the electorate who are too apathetic to see why voting is a necessity for the greater good ( in this case, in my opinion)
If he inflenced one person to vote, or be engaged socially and or politically isn't that the job of a good politician?

But Brand isn't even REGISTERED to vote and DOESN'T vote? How apathetic is that?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

But Brand isn't even REGISTERED to vote and DOESN'T vote? How apathetic is that?

I said brand is the spokesperson for the apathetic... he may have influenced some of the yoof that were previously totally disengaged, that's a good thing right?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Do you think, politicians shouldn't attempt to address the concerns of the disenfranchised then?
Hmmmmm radical.

not by pandering to people like Brand no. he represents no one but himself

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

not by pandering to people like Brand no. he represents no one but himself

Really? he's been making these vids to highlight sociopolitical issues for a year and is an activist for those who need a voice... should he be doing something else?

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Really? he's been making these vids to highlight sociopolitical issues for a year and is an activist for those who need a voice... should he be doing something else?

And I thought he was an activist for those who need a quid.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

And I thought he was an activist for those who need a quid.

Not sure what you're driving at, why did the fact they met offend you so much?

[the truth]

hes shallow narcissist

[MTVN]

He’s the self-styled revolutionary who backed Ed Miliband at the Election and advocates the overthrow of ‘corporate tyranny’.

But The Mail on Sunday can reveal Russell Brand is himself embracing capitalism, trademarking a logo using his own spelling of ‘revolution’.

With supreme irony, his company has reserved the right to use the logo, with backwards letters spelling ‘love’, on trinkets, stationery, wallets – even lingerie.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3Zje7MgWN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by MTVN

What's so funny, how can you fund a revolution if you have no revenue...
If he sells 'Branded' (geddit) goods and it benefits those he works with and for what's the problem?
The mail stepping up their hate campaign due to his anti tory stance during the election?

[Crimson Dynamo]

• Russell Brand is trademarking his own spelling of the word 'revolution'
• His company has reserved right to use the logo with letters spelling 'love'
• Trademark can be used on trinkets, stationery, wallets and even lingerie
• He has been selling T-shirts with similar logo on his website for at least £30

what a joke. Kizzy you need to shut this thread down asap

[MTVN]

Brand is hardly going to be short on funds, and it's not a revolution, it's a marketing ploy. A revolution should not be so exclusive that you can be prosecuted if you want to take up its logo. All genuinely radical activists must think he's a complete tool.