[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yes, and by saying that he's implying bisexuality isn't a real thing ergo does not exist. Since they're being dishonest about it?

Maybe try understanding the so-called "opinion" you're defending?

He accepts they exist. He knows there are people having sex with both genders. He just thinks that they exist for a different reason than you think they exist.

Do you believe he isn't entitled to that opinion?

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

He accepts they exist. He knows there are people having sex with both genders. He just thinks that they exist for a different reason than you think they exist.

Do you believe he isn't entitled to that opinion?

It isn't an opinion though!!!!!!!! He's stating that bisexuals are all hiding from a desire to just sleep with the one gender which isn't what bisexual means!
He didn't say "I think that bisexuals are just afraid of being gay." He stated it as a fact. A fact which is completely and utterly wrong.

[Semtex]

Are Bisexual Men allowed to be Drama Kings?

[Robodog]

I disagree with Biggins 100% on that issue but...

People are entitled to have, and to express opinions that others 100% disagree with.

If not, we are all in trouble.

[lovebigbrotheruk]

Originally Posted by Robodog

I disagree with Biggins 100% on that issue but...

People are entitled to have, and to express opinions that others 100% disagree with.

If not, we are all in trouble.

There is a difference between free speech and hate speech. As far as I'm concerned, what Biggins stated was nothing but hate. There may have been young bisexual men and women who were watching what he said and feeling even worse about themselves than they already do.

Let me say this, I have suffered depression from around the age of 13, mainly because of my sexuality. I was so confused. 'What am I?', I always thought to myself. 'How can I be attracted to both males and females? Something has to be wrong with me. I'm a freak. Okay, I'm probably just confused and need to figure out who I am'.

Fast forward to my 20's, and I was still feeling confused and weird because I am attracted to both males and females. This opinion of myself was formed through others' ignorance on the topic, from those who had been marinated in a toxicity and spitefulness because of some 'off' experience they may have had with someone. I took it on myself to do research about this topic. I found that there is something called a sexuality spectrum. Whilst there are many who are 100% gay or 100% straight; there are also many who fall on the spectrum anywhere in between. Someone can be 60% gay and 40% straight for example. A bisexual may be more attracted to one sex more than another - that doesn't mean they aren't bisexual.

If I, a bisexual male, get turned on by both males and females, what am I? Are you going to tell me that my feelings and instincts are wrong and a lie? Are you going to tell me that I'm disgusting?

When I was 19, I came out as gay as opposed to bisexual due to fear of being rejected by my own community. It was only a year ago that I built up the courage to admit to being bisexual to those around me. Ironically, my family found it harder to accept my bisexuality than me being gay. My current girlfriend doesn't mind and is very open-minded, so I'm very lucky there. I don't and have never slept around, which is a very common misconception of bisexuals. I have only ever slept with 3 people. I am very happy in my current relationship, and my gf knows that I would rather end our r/ship before I would ever even think about cheating on her. It doesn't even come into my mind.

I wish people would do research on a topic, especially when it's affecting their own community. There is a problem within the LGBTQ community with regards to gay people shunning bisexuals.

I am a bisexual and I am proud. My sexuality is normal and valid. If you can't get that through your very ignorant and misinformed brain, I feel sorry for you.

[azelf]

He makes me homouphobic. Even though I'm a homousexual.

[azelf]

I don't mind him now

[Ant.]

The Bisexuals have achieved justice
the biphobe has been removed

[Kizzy]

He can't have been removed for saying that?...

[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Originally Posted by lovebigbrotheruk

"Bisexuals are people who don't want to admit to being gay".

Wtf?

How ignorant can you be?

But isn't it true to some extent? I have yet to meet someone who didn't eventually become ''full'' gay

But can Bernardo go in now then please

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

Is Thriceshy a genuinely confused child or an adult who skipped sex ed classes?

I'm not gonna argue about something that has a wrong and right answer any longer. If its a troll, its hopeless, if its an adult, they're clearly too ignorant for this conversation, if its a child its best to let them learn inside their school.

Prove biggins wrong. Or just admit your opinion differs from his.

At this point you need to do one of them.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Prove biggins wrong. Or just admit your opinion differs from his.

At this point you need to do one of them.

You're refusing to accept millions of voices as proof, you refuse to acknowledge a definition of a word as proof, youd probably refuse any number of the thousands of scientific, sociological and psychological academic papers based on bisexuality as proof, youd refuse to believe a real life bisexual person telling you that they get boners to both men and women as proof..

you dont know what kind of proof you want, how would anybody else?

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

You're refusing to accept millions of voices as proof, you refuse to acknowledge a definition of a word as proof, youd probably refuse any number of the thousands of scientific, sociological and psychological academic papers based on bisexuality as proof, youd refuse to believe a real life bisexual person telling you that they get boners to both men and women as proof..

you dont know what kind of proof you want, how would anybody else?

Could you post some of these? Preferably one's that completely refute Biggins' assertion.

Thanks.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Could you post some of these? Preferably one's that completely refute Biggins' assertion.

Thanks.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1395...n_tab_contents

http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1996-98960-000

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...uality&f=false

http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/dev/44/1/5/

http://link.springer.com/article/10....1542119#page-1

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...uality&f=false

http://journals.lww.com/psychosomati...cept_of.7.aspx

Theres a good days worth of reading there, all of which was found with one single google search, something you should have done before arguing about something you clearly know nothing about. But you asked for academic papers that proved you wrong. Here it is. A days worth of reading, you're welcome. See you in a day.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1395...n_tab_contents

http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1996-98960-000

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...uality&f=false

http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/dev/44/1/5/

http://link.springer.com/article/10....1542119#page-1

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...uality&f=false

http://journals.lww.com/psychosomati...cept_of.7.aspx

Theres a good days worth of reading there, all of which was found with one single google search, something you should have done before arguing about something you clearly know nothing about. But you asked for academic papers that proved you wrong. Here it is. A days worth of reading, you're welcome. See you in a day.

Can you just quote the conclusions that refute what Biggins said? It would save me all that time.

Or have you simply dumped the first few studies that google gave you, without reading them yourself?