[Withano]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Could you post some of these? Preferably one's that completely refute Biggins' assertion.

Thanks.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1395...n_tab_contents

http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1996-98960-000

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...uality&f=false

http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/dev/44/1/5/

http://link.springer.com/article/10....1542119#page-1

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...uality&f=false

http://journals.lww.com/psychosomati...cept_of.7.aspx

Theres a good days worth of reading there, all of which was found with one single google search, something you should have done before arguing about something you clearly know nothing about. But you asked for academic papers that proved you wrong. Here it is. A days worth of reading, you're welcome. See you in a day.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by Withano

http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1395...n_tab_contents

http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1996-98960-000

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...uality&f=false

http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/dev/44/1/5/

http://link.springer.com/article/10....1542119#page-1

https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...uality&f=false

http://journals.lww.com/psychosomati...cept_of.7.aspx

Theres a good days worth of reading there, all of which was found with one single google search, something you should have done before arguing about something you clearly know nothing about. But you asked for academic papers that proved you wrong. Here it is. A days worth of reading, you're welcome. See you in a day.

Can you just quote the conclusions that refute what Biggins said? It would save me all that time.

Or have you simply dumped the first few studies that google gave you, without reading them yourself?