About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

jet · 06-07-2020, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn.

The irony when no one can explain why they feel they have the right to express such hatred behind their keyboards.

You asked me before why I took such an interest in another thread going back months ago and I answered but you ignored and didn't respond. I'll answer more briefly here because you'll probably do the same again.
I don't hate Meghan, but I dislike her actions and what I have learned of her character.
I have a great interest in the Royal family and Royal history going all the way back to Alfred the Great. I have a whole bookcase full of Royal histories and biographies. I belong to a Royal Forum where we discuss all members past and present. Queen Elizabeth the 1st is my favourite. Diana interested me greatly. Meghan and Harry's path interest me - their future history for a future generation of Royal history buffs is going to be interesting.

Glenn. · 05-07-2020, 11:04 PM

There’s definitely hatred. Irrational jealous hatred

LukeB · 05-07-2020, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

The press are treating her the same horrible way they treated our beautiful Princess Diana.

the only difference is with social media existing and the racist abuse she has received

rusticgal · 05-07-2020, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeB

the only difference is the racist abuse Meghan has received

What racist abuse? Please elaborate.

LukeB · 05-07-2020, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal

What racist abuse? Please elaborate.

She has been compared to a monkey, i said it regarding social media because the times has changed so not only are the press hounding/writing fake stories she now has social media abuse as well.

jet · 06-07-2020, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeB

She has been compared to a monkey, i said it regarding social media because the times has changed so not only are the press hounding/writing fake stories she now has social media abuse as well.

One person made a comment about a monkey, said it was taken out of context and apologised, whatever, it was a ridiculous and awful comment but one person doesn't speak for thousands more.

Meghan wasn't/isn't being hounded, Diana was hounded.
Which stories do you regard as fake? Links please?

As for social media - why does anyone read that stuff? Abuse of anyone and everyone is the norm, not the exception. Meghan doesn't have a special pass.

Liam- · 05-07-2020, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal

What racist abuse? Please elaborate.

The royal family literally put a statement out condemning the racism she had been receiving, someone was arrested for threatening to kill Harry because he was a ‘race traitor’ for marrying a black woman, it’s easy to not realise it’s happening if you don’t want to see it happens

LukeB · 05-07-2020, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam-

The royal family literally put a statement out condemning the racism she had been receiving, someone was arrested for threatening to kill Harry because he was a ‘race traitor’ for marrying a black woman, it’s easy to not realise it’s happening if you don’t want to see it happens

this too

Marsh. · 05-07-2020, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liam-

The royal family literally put a statement out condemning the racism she had been receiving, someone was arrested for threatening to kill Harry because he was a ‘race traitor’ for marrying a black woman, it’s easy to not realise it’s happening if you don’t want to see it happens

If they didn't see it, it didn't happen. Bizarre logic.

jet · 05-07-2020, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

If they didn't see it, it didn't happen. Bizarre logic.

Its the logic you've been applying all along about anything remotely negative about Meghan, but suddenly you know about this and have seen it.

FYI, the Royal family didn't put out a statement about this, Harry did, entirely off his own bat.

rusticgal · 06-07-2020, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

If they didn't see it, it didn't happen. Bizarre logic.

If i didnt see it then I dont KNOW it happened...its your logic that is bizarre. Im asking the question because I'm interested to know. I do recall the 'monkey' picture which was disturbing but other than that Im unaware as apart from TIBB and Facebook I dont do any other social media.

Liam- · 05-07-2020, 11:17 PM

It feels like I’ve been bashing my head against a wall reading the past few pages

Marsh. · 06-07-2020, 08:47 AM

Yes Cherie, didn't you know a source said. A SOURCE!!! Can you believe it? A source!

Yes, Cherie, a source.

jet · 06-07-2020, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yes Cherie, didn't you know a source said. A SOURCE!!! Can you believe it? A source!

Yes, Cherie, a source.

The Judge at the first hearing has already thrown her allegations of bad press treatment out. I know you have trouble with comprehension Marsh, so here is an excerpt from an article I already posted on this very thread:

Quote:

Mr Justice Warby has also 'struck out' her allegations that journalists had acted dishonestly and had caused the rift between her and her estranged father Thomas by ‘digging up dirt’ to portray Meghan in a 'negative light'.

jet · 06-07-2020, 09:45 AM

Meghan Markle's claim she was unprotected RUBBISHED by senior royals as 'ridiculous'

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal...ted-royal-news

Quote:

MEGHAN MARKLE's claim she felt "unprotected by the institution" has been fiercely denied by senior royal sources as "fiction".
By ALICE SCARSI

Royal sources lashed out at the new claims made by the legal team of Meghan in documents filed on June 30 as part of her court case against the Mail on Sunday. These legal documents, filed following a request of the defendant in the court case, made the astonishing claim Meghan was not allowed to defend herself while at the same time she was not protected from reports published in the press.

Sources branded these allegations "ridiculous" and "galling".
One told The Sunday Times: "It's a ridiculous claim. "It's so bloody disappointing.
"The institution was doing everything in its power to support her. "Everyone was trying to help her."
Another source told the Sunday paper: "It's fiction and galling."
And a third said: "It's completely inaccurate and total rubbish".

This insider went on saying aides "rebutted every unfounded story they possibly could within reason" and "stretched their relationship with the media to breaking point".
etc……….

user104658 · 06-07-2020, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet

Meghan Markle's claim she was unprotected RUBBISHED by senior royals as 'ridiculous'

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal...ted-royal-news

"Megan's claim that senior royals are arseholes is NONSENSE, according to 90% of senior royals polled."

Glenn. · 06-07-2020, 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet

Meghan Markle's claim she was unprotected RUBBISHED by senior royals as 'ridiculous'

https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal...ted-royal-news

Are these the type of ‘royal correspondent’ stories you’re referring to when you say you only read from royal correspondents?

Ammi · 06-07-2020, 10:58 AM

...I guess the clue is in the title...Royal corespondents will always lean in bias toward the blood royal family...rather than those who have married into the family...and so it has always been written....

jet · 06-07-2020, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Are these the type of ‘royal correspondent’ stories you’re referring to when you say you only read from royal correspondents?

In a word, no.

Marsh. · 06-07-2020, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet

The Judge at the first hearing has already thrown her allegations of bad press treatment out. I know you have trouble with comprehension Marsh, so here is an excerpt from an article I already posted on this very thread:

Oh I'm aware of articles you post on this thread. They're all from the same place.

But here you're arguing a point nobody made.

My post simply stated you claimed she hadn't filed any lawsuits, she's filed several. You lied. It's that simple.

jet · 06-07-2020, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Oh I'm aware of articles you post on this thread. They're all from the same place.

But here you're arguing a point nobody made.

My post simply stated you claimed she hadn't filed any lawsuits, she's filed several. You lied. It's that simple.

There is only one lawsuit that I know of, anything I posted is all from the same lawsuit.
Still waiting for you to post of the others you claim to know about.

Marsh. · 06-07-2020, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet

There is only one lawsuit that I know of, anything I posted is all from the same lawsuit.
Still waiting for you to post of the others you claim to know about.

I never made any comment on the status of any lawsuit only that there are lawsuits, when you claimed there were none.

Rustic claimed they are only regarding her father's letter. They're not.

Again, I'm not here to do your research for you when you love telling us how well versed you are on all the facts.

Go beyond the Daily Mail and you will see.