[Holly Christmas]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

What's funny about a vulnerable women being jailed for far too long? The system stinks.

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by Kate!

What's funny about a vulnerable women being jailed for far too long? The system stinks.

She’s not vulnerable

I can make this whole situation real simple for the hard of understanding.
She is a proven racist criminal, pled guilty, found guilty.
Any person or media saying otherwise is either manipulating you, an idiot and / or a racist themselves.

[Holly Christmas]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

She’s not vulnerable

I can make this whole situation real simple for the hard of understanding.
She is a proven racist criminal, pled guilty, found guilty.
Any person or media saying otherwise is either manipulating you, an idiot and / or a racist themselves.

She's neither racist nor a criminal in my eyes. The vast majority see it the same way. You're in a minority.

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by Kate!

She's neither racist nor a criminal in my eyes. The vast majority see it the same way. You're in a minority.

Well as a Trump supporter and a reform voter that’s not exactly news is it

Sigh.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

She’s not vulnerable

I can make this whole situation real simple for the hard of understanding.
She is a proven racist criminal, pled guilty, found guilty.
Any person or media saying otherwise is either manipulating you, an idiot and / or a racist themselves.

I'm saying one last thing on this as I'm stunned at the supporting of this vile individual.
I guess we do learn something every day about people.

However I agree with every word you've said in your post above.

There is NO excusing her, plus never mind her original day in court.
She had an appeal heard too, which was equally on the hard evidence provided, leaving the sentence in place.

She is in effect the real kind of people whose opinions the UK would be better without in my opinion.
Absolutely for me.

[Holly Christmas]

I hope Lucy makes a lot of money telling her story if she's not gagged. She deserves compensation. She shouldn't have gotten anymore than a rap on the knuckles.

[Good King Glennceslas]

In fact, the court was told that the day before she was arrested, Connolly had sent a WhatsApp message saying the “raging tweet about burning down hotels has bit me on the arse lol”. She also said she’d “play the mental health card” if arrested, and would deny responsibility for the post if asked.



“She has mental health issues”

[Holly Christmas]

Rather support people like Lucy and my choice of politicians than murdering bastards who should never have been here, and the bloody Labour Party and it's acolytes who still support them despite them being scum and ruining our lovely country.

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Rather support people like Lucy and my choice of politicians than murdering bastards who should never have been here, and the bloody Labour Party and it's acolytes who still support them despite them being scum and ruining our lovely country.

Who are the murdering bastards?

[Holly Christmas]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Who are the murdering bastards?

Axel Rudakabana and the likes

[Good King Glennceslas]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Rather support people like Lucy and my choice of politicians than murdering bastards who should never have been here, and the bloody Labour Party and it's acolytes who still support them despite them being scum and ruining our lovely country.

…..

[Good King Glennceslas]

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Are we seriously putting Lucy Connelly in the same league as Abu Hamza I am literally done with the foolishness of these comparisons

why was abu hamza imprisoned
Abu Hamza was imprisoned for his involvement in terrorism and kidnapping. He was sentenced to life in a US prison after being found guilty of 11 charges of terrorism and kidnapping. His role in inspiring jihadist sympathizers was highlighted by British security services, and he was mentored by Djamel Beghal, who had been based at Hamza’s Finsbury Park Mosque in London. His preaching at Finsbury Park Mosque, which supported Osama Bin Laden and called for jihad in the Middle East, inspired the 7/7 bombers. Despite his arrest in 2003, he continued to preach outside the Mosque until his arrest in 2004. His legal battles and life sentence have kept him in the public eye, raising questions about his current confinement as 2025 unfolds.

Abdullah El Faisal
Abdullah El Faisal, born Trevor William Forrest, is a Jamaican Muslim cleric who has been a controversial figure in the UK and the United States. He was convicted of stirring up racial hatred and urging his followers to murder Jews, Hindus, Christians, Americans, and other "unbelievers." El Faisal was sentenced to nine years in prison, of which he served four years before being deported to Jamaica in 2007. He later traveled to Africa, but was deported from Botswana in 2009 and from Kenya back to Jamaica in January 2010. In 2020, El Faisal was extradited to New York City after being arrested in Jamaica in 2017. He was subsequently convicted in January 2023 in New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan on counts including soliciting or providing support for an act of terrorism. He was sentenced to 18 years in prison.

Could you at least do some research before regurgitating shite all over the forum please

[Holly Christmas]

SHE REMOVED IT.

[Holly Christmas]

There's no excusing her?? Of course there flipping well is. Others have done far worse and nothing has been done.

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Kate!

There's no excusing her?? Of course there flipping well is. Others have done far worse and nothing has been done.

Other people committing crime and not being tried properly is not an excuse or defence for her. By that logic I could go out and commit a crime and it be okay because people who have done worse haven’t gone to prison for it. Thats not how it works and isn’t a defence.

Do you want people to be tried by the laws that exist or don’t you? You seem confused

I personally don’t agree with the actual law that exists, but it does exist and she broke it with her gross behaviour. Her being a mother, which seems to be one of the biggest defence on this thread, is not an excuse.

Extremely telling those who keep on talking about two tier policing would be happy for someone to receive lesser sentences just because they’ve reproduced.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Other people committing crime and not being tried properly is not an excuse or defence for her. By that logic I could go out and commit a crime and it be okay because people who have done worse haven’t gone to prison for it. Thats not how it works and isn’t a defence.

Do you want people to be tried by the laws that exist or don’t you? You seem confused

I personally don’t agree with the actual law that exists, but it does exist and she broke it with her gross behaviour. Her being a mother, which seems to be one of the biggest defence on this thread, is not an excuse.

Extremely telling those who keep on talking about two tier policing would be happy for someone to receive lesser sentences just because they’ve reproduced.

You don’t really know what you are talking about
They are letting rapist’s off if they agree to say sorry to their victims
The amount of nfa ‘s are through the roof

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

You don’t really know what you are talking about
They are letting rapist’s off if they agree to say sorry to their victims
The amount of nfa ‘s are through the roof

And nowhere did I say that was good, fair and just, but that doesn’t mean she is innocent.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by BBXX

And nowhere did I say that was good, fair and just, but that doesn’t mean she is innocent.

She is guilty of saying something nasty but the punishment didn’t match the crime

The fact that they were basically told plead guilty or you will get an even bigger sentence was so very wrong

You seem like an intelligent guy, there must be a point in which you concede that these sentences were not lawful because they didn’t use the guidelines when it came to sentencing

The government didn’t use bullets but sentences to stop any further unlawful activity by going for maximum imprisonment

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Other people committing crime and not being tried properly is not an excuse or defence for her. By that logic I could go out and commit a crime and it be okay because people who have done worse haven’t gone to prison for it. Thats not how it works and isn’t a defence.

Do you want people to be tried by the laws that exist or don’t you? You seem confused

I personally don’t agree with the actual law that exists, but it does exist and she broke it with her gross behaviour. Her being a mother, which seems to be one of the biggest defence on this thread, is not an excuse.

[B]Extremely telling those who keep on talking about two tier policing would be happy for someone to receive lesser sentences just because they’ve reproduced.

My goodness what a disgusting and dismissive remark, there are plenty mothers in prison who deserve to be there, the mitigating circumstance in this case is that she LOST a child and thereby could empatise with families losing children in needless circumstances, I dont think anyone has advocated for anyone who has had a child to be given a lessor or suspended sentence, but you know there are plenty MEN who have swerved jail time for GBH and ABH also I dont know what is telling about it, maybe you can expand on your thought process

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Cherie

My goodness what a disgusting and dismissive remark, there are plenty mothers in prison who deserve to be there, the mitigating circumstance in this case is that she LOST a child and thereby could empatise with families losing children in needless circumstances, I dont think anyone has advocated for anyone who has had a child to be given a lessor or suspended sentence, also I dont know what is telling about it, maybe you can expand on your thought process

Incredible that questioning why someone having child is being used a reason for them not to go to prison is a disgusting take but someone advocating for migrants to burned alive isn’t.

There were plenty of “but she has a 12 year old” used in this thread as a reason why she either shouldn’t have gone to prison or got a suspended sentence and that’s what I’m referring to. This entire thread was starting by you off the back of an article that was saying it was unfair she wasn't allowed home to see her daughter.

It’s telling because those same people are the ones who harm on about a two tier justice system yet are advocating for a racist white woman to be spared jail because she gave birth 12 years ago. Make it make sense.

Obviously it’s horrific she lost a child but plenty of people have lost a child and not turned racist. Migrants in hotels was completely unconnected to a a British born man killing three children. Even if it HAD been a migrant who killed them, saying you didn’t care about all migrants being burned alive is still RACIST because once again you’re using the actions of one migrant to advocate the death of all others. How are you able to justify that?

What if instead of it being a black man to kill the girls it was a Catholic priest and then, in the middle of antisemitic riots off the back of this incident, she went online and advocated for the burning of synagogues? Would you be willing to concede she was a hateful antisemite using her hatred for said group off the back of a horrific incident that was completely unrelated, further putting Jews in danger.

Just to hammer it home for those who have forgotten: not only was the murderer not a migrant, her child didn’t die at the hands of a migrant but yet it was hotels of migrants that were the subject of the tweet?

...but you know there are plenty MEN who have swerved jail time for GBH and ABH

That’s not what the thread is about. I’m not talking about men swerving jail for GBH, nowhere have I spoken about that or said it’s correct?

Nobody should swerve jail for committing a crime. Thats part of my entire point. Why are you acting like I have supported that?

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Incredible that questioning why someone having child is being used a reason for them not to go to prison is a disgusting take but someone advocating for migrants to burned alive isn’t.

There were plenty of “but she has a 12 year old” used in this thread as a reason why she either shouldn’t have gone to prison or got a suspended sentence and that’s what I’m referring to. This entire thread was starting by you off the back of an article that was saying it was unfair she wasn't allowed home to see her daughter.

It’s telling because those same people are the ones who harm on about a two tier justice system yet are advocating for a racist white woman to be spared jail because she gave birth 12 years ago. Make it make sense.

Obviously it’s horrific she lost a child but plenty of people have lost a child and not turned racist. Migrants in hotels was completely unconnected to a a British born man killing three children. Even if it HAD been a migrant who killed them, saying you didn’t care about all migrants being burned alive is still RACIST because once again you’re using the actions of one migrant to advocate the death of all others. How are you able to justify that?

What if instead of it being a black man to kill the girls it was a Catholic priest and then, in the middle of antisemitic riots off the back of this incident, she went online and advocated for the burning of synagogues? Would you be willing to concede she was a hateful antisemite using her hatred for said group off the back of a horrific incident that was completely unrelated, further putting Jews in danger.

Just to hammer it home for those who have forgotten: not only was the murderer not a migrant, her child didn’t die at the hands of a migrant but yet it was hotels of migrants that were the subject of the tweet?



That’s not what the thread is about. I’m not talking about men swerving jail for GBH, nowhere have I spoken about that or said it’s correct?

Nobody should swerve jail for committing a crime. Thats part of my entire point. Why are you acting like I have supported that?

Again, I personally have never said she was correct in what she said, what I have said multiple times if you read the thread back is that her sentence was inappropriate to the crime. In addition the thread was started not with regard to her being incarcerated but because she was denied day leave to visit her child you just need to jump to the first page or indeed the title of the thread to see this. With regard to my pointing out that many MEN swerve jail that is in relation to the sentence she got compared to some men actually causing physical harm and getting suspended sentences, there is a very recent one of a Welsh guy who choked his partner and kicked her but because he had no previous he got a suspended sentence, its very hard not to see that this was political. The whole premise of the thread was her being denied day leave not about her original sentence.l

[Holly Christmas]

Team Reform. Team Lucy Connolly.

Get Labour Scum out. Lucy was a political prisoner. Starmer even pretended he didn't even know about her case. Lying Scum.

[Good King Glennceslas]

[Good King Glennceslas]