| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB11 Channel 4's last Big Brother series started June 2010. Josie Gibson was the winner. All the gossip about the Big Brother 11 house, series and housemates here! |
| View Poll Results: Which tasks/twist is a better format change? | ||||||
| BB9's Head of House tasks |
|
9 | 33.33% | |||
|
||||||
| BB11's Nominations tasks |
|
18 | 66.67% | |||
|
||||||
| Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll | ||||||
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Just been reading comments about the nominations twist and reactions seem kinda mixed. Which tasks/recent format change do you prefer? Which is more entertaining so far? Which has a better overall impact on the house and public?
BB9's Head of House tasks which affected the heaven/hell divide (excusing BB3's rich/poor divide)? Or BB11's Nominations tasks which obviously affect who the evictees are?
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
I know it's early days for BB11 and people considered BB9's divide a carbon copy of BB3 but I liked them both.
I'll probably go for BB11 because it means HM have to earn the right to stay in the house, the cheese task was active and fun to watch, and the cheese task suited the carnival theme of the series. BB9's only lasted weeks 6-12 and didn't really fit the 'zero tolerance' theme
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
V.I.P
|
Anything BB9 does is miles better than this pathetic series.
Tbh I like BB11 but it doesn't compare to BB9 at all.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
V.I.P
|
Quote:
Heaven and Hell did suit the BB9 theme the entire house was built around it this nomination thing was just thrown in and doesn't match anything. The Head of House thing was great and it was good to see the house being devided and having a leader, I'd much rather watch that than a Fat Holy Welsh Man running back and forward with a block of cheese only to win and kick out a fit girl.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Quote:
Anyways, I loved BB9. Really do believe if BB8 never happened and BB9 was the first series after CBB5 the ratings would still be high and BB could have been spared the axe. I think a lot of BB9's critcisms was that it was trying to be like BB3 with the divide, or BB5 with Fight Night II, BB6 with the house, or even BB7 with the series length etc but weren't as good as those previous series but I like it because it tried to incorprate all those elements of already successful series and think it pulled it off quite well
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Quote:
Yeah that's the criticism of this year's twist - one week someone who escaped nomiantions that the public wanted out could escape nominations but then be put up after the task, but then again it could also backfire like Rachael's and Dave remains in the house. Unless this happens week after week I think it's an exciting gamble.
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
I liked head of house tasks. This twist is just unfair.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
-
|
i cant really remember the rules of hoh, this twist is good but in a way its bad because it means the most entertaining could end up going without even being nominated
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||
|
||||
|
-
|
for example, even though i loathe govan he needs to stay in the house because he causes the most drama
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
||||
|
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Quote:
BB9 was different each week. In week 6 three Hms had to elect who they wanted as HoH, in week 7 three had to hang from tyres dressed as gorillas, in week 8 all HMs had to eat chilli peppers etc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bro...#Head_of_House Wheras BB11's unpredictable because anyone could face eviction depending on who missed out on nominations, who passes the task, who they're up against. So Rachael went last week and Dave was saved but perhaps this week Govan might be up or even Steve because "They're HMs the public are likely to keep in" lol Obviosuly we've only seen the first nominations task so they might not all be as active but it was quite an entertaining task
__________________
Last edited by Mac Hiavellian; 21-06-2010 at 12:32 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
||||
|
The Red witch
|
BB9's HoH tasks, i just think these BB11 tasks are very unfair because thes epeople were nominated to face eviction yet people who didnt even get enough to be put up end up facing the eviction instead, i'd feel cheated to be put up for eviction when I wasn't even nominated to
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
||||
|
Take me to the hole!
|
BB9's Head of House by a country mile. The new BB11 format is just completely pathetic and rips out the whole concept of nominations.
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
||||
|
Namaste
|
The HoH seemed pointless to me, it is the instrumental piece of BB USA, but semeed randomly inserted halfway through, and used differently, in our BB.
I like the introduction of the veto, however. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
||||
|
Nothing in excess
|
Well they're both a form of veiled meddling, but at least the HoH tasks didn't let nominees get off scott free.
__________________
No matter that they act like senile 12-year-olds on the Today programme website - smoking illegal fags to look tough and cool. No matter that Amis coins truly abominable terms like 'the age of horrorism' and when criticised tells people to 'fuck off'. Surely we all chuckle at the strenuous ennui of his salon drawl. Didn't he once accidentally sneer his face off? - Chris Morris - The Absurd World of Martin Amis |
|||
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
BB9 without a doubt - that twist was completely fair and the process was clear. HMs got to decide who competed for HoH and the "housemates from hell" had their own fate in their hands when competing for the right to nominate.
Though it looks like they might be spending money on tasks this year, as long as it's just the nominees competing in the "save and replace" task it is completely unfair on the rest of the house, and as suggested numerous times at the very least a few non-nominated HMs should be chosen at random to also have the chance to ensure they don't face eviction.
__________________
2000:SO MUCH MORE THAN JUST A TV SHOW! 2009: Just a TV show. 2011: Not even a BB show. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|