[ElProximo]

BB is primarily a 'social status/dynamic' competition. There is no real objective measure for a 'deserving winner',
however,
We always consider how they handle themselves in there, in light of what social skills, social background and social status they came from.

A HM may win for being a transsexual and immigrant who is then 'rewarded' for somehow behaving/socially interacting well in their own context. From what they started with and how they were fit in the House.

Other HMs won for being attractive girls who were then 'dumped' by a scoundrel and therefore 'rewarded' for being the 'girl power' cause of the week.

HMs have won for being a bit simple-minded and then rewarded for how they overcame their disadvantage.

SO... ... Steve has as much right or reason to win because he has entered with a unique social status/situation,
and,
then how he deals with that disability and position throughout BB.

If you disagree then tell me how you would apply the same standard for Steve to any other HM?

Why should I accept that "he ought not win just because of his disability and heroic service".
Why not?
I say its as good a reason as any other and why not?