[arista]

You would think the Police in America would stop this Event.
It appears to be going ahead
if he is still alive on sunday.


Defiant: The Reverend Terry Jones outside his church with a sign advertising his September 11 book-burning protest

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worl...#ixzz0z0vxTyaY



Sign Of The Times

[ange7]

There are many mongs, ******* and ******* wits that want to make a DIRECT link between ALL Muslims and 9/11. They pop up in the most unlikely places.
Reverend Terry Jones is an ubber c*ck munch. The word "Defiant" implies he is taking a heroic stand. I think he is drumming up business for his church and isn't choosy about who joins. He is preaching hate and intolerance and is no better than the radical fundamentalist variety of Muslims that do the same.

[arista]

Rev Jones
now makes sure his Gun is with him
at all times.

[ange7]

"if he is still alive on sunday."
"now makes sure his Gun is with him"

this makes it sound like Rev Jones is the victim. As though he is blameless and not trying to start something. Arista feels for Rev Jones.
In fact he is the mong, and like Al-Qaeda is in the fear business. Intolerance and hate keep him employed because that's what the locals in his area want to hear. The retarded @ss rimmers want to see a DIRECT link between 9/11 and the wider moderate Muslim community. Too bad for him that the majority of Americans disagree.

[ILoveTRW]

TBH burn every religious book in the world and we would all be better off.

[ange7]

Originally Posted by ILoveTRW

TBH burn every religious book in the world and we would all be better off.

"TBH" others in history have tried out your book burning philosophy. Guess who?

[Omen]

[arista]

Jones has his own book.


Barrack the US President
spoke about this and said he should not do it. (on abc news)
Why does he not arrest him
get him out of the way.

[Tom4784]

Well that's gonna help things isn't it? Phillip Defranco covered it in one of his videos and this man's 'church' sounded more like a Cult.

This utterly idiotic fool is putting lives at risk and it's only going to reult in more soldier's deaths. It's completely sickening and I hope to god no one is hurt as a result of this utter cock's actions although I think its unavoidable if he goes through with it.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

Jones has his own book.


Barrack the US President
spoke about this and said he should not do it. (on abc news)
Why does he not arrest him
get him out of the way.

The First Ammendment, it'd be unconstitutional to arrest him as it's his own opinion and right to burn the books although it isn't right.

[arista]

Arrest him on Terrorism Laws
he will cause Terrorism around the World and America.

So It can be Justified to arrest him.

[arista]

Pakistanis protest against the Qur'an-burning plans of a US preacher, which Barack Obama says will only help to recruit terrorists. Photograph: M K Chaudhry/EPA


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010...m-barack-obama


The Fight is on.

[BB_Eye]

They should let it go ahead. Just like they would let one of those "Death to America" protests go ahead. It's all pretty nasty and vile, but it's freedom of speech.

[arista]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

They should let it go ahead. Just like they would let one of those "Death to America" protests go ahead. It's all pretty nasty and vile, but it's freedom of speech.

In the UK it would be stopped.


America is still in a War
so because of that - Arrest him, lock him up.

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by arista

Arrest him on Terrorism Laws
he will cause Terrorism around the World and America.

So It can be Justified to arrest him.

Those terrorism laws are draconian in the first place.

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by arista

In the UK it would be stopped.


America is still in a War
so because of that - Arrest him, lock him up.

I'm sure it would be stopped in the UK, but it still wouldn't be right. National security doesn't trump freedom of speech.

[Iceman]

I read the title of this as Burn-A-Korean day......

[Angus]

Funny how muslims can say any amount of blasphemous things about other religions but they do not afford others the same right to do so. However, it's not the Koran that is dangerous and evil, but the moronic brainwashed zealots who do not actually follow the true Islam at all, but use it only as a smokescreen to validate their acts of terrorism.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Iceman

I read the title of this as Burn-A-Korean day......

Wicked

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

They should let it go ahead. Just like they would let one of those "Death to America" protests go ahead. It's all pretty nasty and vile, but it's freedom of speech.

I disagree that burning the Quran is freedom of speech; it's a hate crime

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by MTVN

I disagree that burning the Quran is freedom of speech; it's a hate crime

Really? I don't see anyone being attacked or their rights being violated. It's same as saying something racist or homophobic (something that I understand the Muslim Council of Britain have down to an art form). It's horrible and a sign of stupidity and ignorance, but it's not a hate crime. Not by any stretch. If we are doing to allow muslims to stage protests with placards reading "Death to the UK/USA" and burning our flags (which I don't consider to be a crime either), we have to be prepared to afford other groups the same rights. It's called living in a democracy.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

Really? I don't see anyone being attacked or their rights being violated. It's same as saying something racist or homophobic (something that I understand the Muslim Council of Britain have down to an art form). It's horrible and a sign of stupidity and ignorance, but it's not a hate crime. Not by any stretch. If we are doing to allow muslims to stage protests with placards reading "Death to the UK/USA" and burning our flags (which I don't consider to be a crime either), we have to be prepared to afford other groups the same rights. It's called living in a democracy.

But there's a difference between airing your views and performing an act which is deliberately provocative, and intended to spur up racial violence.

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by MTVN

But there's a difference between airing your views and performing an act which is deliberately provocative, and intended to spur up racial violence.

They can be as 'deliberately provocative' as they like. Nobody is responsible for going out and commiting violence other than the assailant. As for the victims, at least allow them the right to blame their attackers. Blaming other people is the typical pathetic defence mechanism of a criminal who can't take any responsibility for their actions.

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

They can be as 'deliberately provocative' as they like. Nobody is responsible for going out and commiting violence other than the assailant. As for the victims, at least allow them the right to blame their attackers. Blaming other people is the typical pathetic defence mechanism of a criminal who can't take any responsibility for their actions.

Well, I think those who knowingly instigate violence should be held partly responsible as well. Yes, everyone has a right to free speech, but when it is being blatantly abused then something has to be done, some things are more important.

Besides, is it really free speech to burn what is considered a holy book? It's an act of hate, prejudice and intolerance that could have severe repercussions, and it would be to the benefit of everyone if it was not allowed to go ahead

[arista]

Yes America is a Mess.

They are not stopping this
even though Terror Attack Worldwide could start up.

If I worked in a American Embassy
I would take a month off.