[arista]

TV Shack owner a British bloke 23 year old
can now be sent to America.
Court just ruled.


http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16148629


Richard O'Dwyer



SkyNewsHD and Radio5

[lostalex]

He'll get a fair fair trial.

[Marsh.]

I don't see how he can be found guilty though because, like it says in the article, he was basically making his own "search engine" and directing people to different websites. Just like google points you to pirate sites. It's the people who actually upload the content that are breaking the law.

[arista]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

I don't see how he can be found guilty though because, like it says in the article, he was basically making his own "search engine" and directing people to different websites. Just like google points you to pirate sites. It's the people who actually upload the content that are breaking the law.

He made money
from his Site on Ads
thats how they can Nail Him.

He will be a Example
more to follow.


Student Hacker Can Be Extradited To The US

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

I don't see how he can be found guilty though because, like it says in the article, he was basically making his own "search engine" and directing people to different websites. Just like google points you to pirate sites. It's the people who actually upload the content that are breaking the law.

you can;'t compare his site to google. Google doesn't point people to illegal downloading sites on purpose. this guy made a website for the explicit purpose of giving links to illegal downloads. His entire website was meant to give links to illegal downloads.

How can you say that's the same thing???

He was obviously making an entire website to give illegal downloads, that's not like Google at all.

[Niall]

He's hot -didn't read article-

[arista]

Originally Posted by Niall

He's hot -didn't read article-

I am sure in the Jail they will like the Student

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Niall

He's hot -didn't read article-

by Romford standards maybe... lol. Hot?? really???

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Niall

He's hot -didn't read article-

Lol, he looks like a malnourished Joshua Jackson.

[arista]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

Lol, he looks like a malnourished Joshua Jackson.

[lostalex]

Donnie Darko with Down's syndrome.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by arista

What? Is this supposed to be telling me something?

[arista]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

What? Is this supposed to be telling me something?

No its just Another Photo.


He made money from ads on his Site used by many
Jail Him.

[MTVN]

I sympathise with him, sites like this are all over the place it's how I watch most of my films, type into Google "watch [insert any film title] online" and there'll be dozens of results with places that'll list a load of links. Surely it's those who upload the films illegally who they should be targeting, not just those who provide links to those films

[Me. I Am Salman]

Originally Posted by MTVN

I sympathise with him, sites like this are all over the place it's how I watch most of my films, type into Google "watch [insert any film title] online" and there'll be dozens of results with places that'll list a load of links. Surely it's those who upload the films illegally who they should be targeting, not just those who provide links to those films

ooh watch out youve just admitted you watch piracy

[Me. I Am Salman]

Poor bloke, the law is messed

[Tom4784]

I hate extradition especially for petty cases like this. Put him on trial in his own country and don't give into the pressure from the american government. I hope he gets it appealed.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I hate extradition especially for petty cases like this. Put him on trial in his own country and don't give into the pressure from the american government. I hope he gets it appealed.

I agree, extradition should only be for violent crimes imo.

[billy123]

Originally Posted by arista

No its just Another Photo.


He made money from ads on his Site used by many
Jail Him.

Did you get permission from the copyright owner of that image in your avatar that is STOLEN from a movie arista?

http://www.rightsforartists.com/copyright.html

If you are not the original creator or copyright owner of the image, you cannot legally redistribute that image. Scanning an image and placing it online is redistribution and it is a breach of copyright.

Dont preach what your not willing to practice arista.

[_Seth]

He's hot.

[arista]

Yes I have permission,
bobnot

[arista]

Originally Posted by Phlip

He's hot.

He maybe


But His Site Made Money
Thats the Legal Side to Lock him up.

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by Phlip

He's hot.

i hope yur under 18, he looks like a teenager.

[_Seth]

I'm 18.

[billy123]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes I have permission,
bobnot

Who/Where from arista? im curious.
Lets cut to the chase. The majority of people that defend copyright law dont even understand it to the point that they regularly break it themselves while making hypocritical statements about other people and their use of the internet.
Some people need to pause for a second and educate themselves to the laws they are defending before they mount that soap box they so love to occupy on certain issues

How silly would it be someone was to notify the powers that be that arista was breaking copyright law about 20 times a day?
If SOPA is passed you may log onto tibb to find this message and all due to ignorance.



I would like it if tibb shut down for 24 hours on the 18th jan in protest at sopa but i wont hold my breath.
replaced with this message.