FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
BB13 Big Brother 13 started June 5th 2012 on Channel 5, and was won by Luke A. Discuss here. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
16-06-2012, 01:15 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
AKA Arsenalforever
|
Just to make sure we won't lose great HM's early and give the chance for the show to get off the ground.
I think over the long run it could make sure we lose deadwood early.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:28 AM | #2 | |||
|
||||
Focus
|
Thing is the whole nominating process is the deal with BB. And people would tire having to vote for their favourites.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:29 AM | #3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:30 AM | #4 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Well I've always said it should happen at least twice every series regardless as a general rule with some double evictions to cull the dull, but perhaps at the start isn't that bad an idea.
I have to say the constant loss of big characters does throw up some important questions regarding the nominations process - maybe it's time it was altered slightly, or indeed scrapped altogether? I love nominations but the issue is that it's always the housemates that you want to keep as a viewer (i.e. the ones that are annoying the others) that are up for that very reason, there's a conflict of ideas obviously between the housemates themselves and the viewer, and it's not great really. |
||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:32 AM | #5 | |||
|
||||
AKA Arsenalforever
|
Just for two weeks or so, We can't afford to lose many more Great Hm's thanks to Teenies . The shows have suffered thanks to the Public's bad taste.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:35 AM | #6 | |||
|
||||
AKA Arsenalforever
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:41 AM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Focus
|
Also some HMs are slow-burners so we could actually get rid of somebody potentially amazing. Vote to Save works with 3+ so I think that should be the limit up (at least until half way).
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:43 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
V.I.P
|
They should alter the nomination process next year perhaps - so the housemates vote to keep eachother in.
But then that could also backfire.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:45 AM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Focus
|
Quote:
Unless they have to change from the week before
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
16-06-2012, 01:49 AM | #10 | ||
|
|||
oh fack off
|
Positive nominations could work (although I've never really liked the idea and would miss negative ones, but like has been said there is an issue clearly), you could have the housemates with the least nominations up - there'd almost definitely be a fair few up, potentially five or six each week.
And I have a feeling the larger characters could do better under positive nominations as well, while no one's gonna hate Luke A/Benedict enough to nominate them under, I can't really see many positively voting for them? They'd surely choose the bigger characters, like Chris who evidently after tonight's show was loved by quite a few - just struggled because of how irritating he was for them under negative noms. Could work in the bigger characters favour potentially. Yeah I agree. |
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|