[Craiggy]

I had this random idea just come to me. Wouldnt it be good if after surviving an eviction you gained immunity from next weeks vote? Say if it was Lydia V Ash. Lydia stays and therefore is immune from nominations next week?

It means more housemates are prone to being evicted instead of them targetting the same old people. And there fans having to spend the most money etc.!

[BJ]

I think it sounds an interesting idea

[Niamh.]

I love that idea

[HBB1508]

Sounds a good idea to me.

[fruit_cake]

sounds like a great idea

[Beastie]

Hell yeah! Go for it.

[R0B1S]

What if more than two housemates were up for eviction? Let's say 4. Three housemates getting immunity would not be a good idea at all.

[Jords]

Originally Posted by R0B1S

What if more than two housemates where up for eviction? Let's say 4. Three housemates getting immunity would not be a good idea at all.

Yeah this is the problem. Unless they compete for it?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Jords

Yeah this is the problem. Unless they compete for it?

Or maybe the two with highest votes would be immune? Or one, whichever

[crocs]

I'd like them to have no immunities unless they have competed for one (and I don't mean that an audience vote is that kind of a competition). They should be able to nominate whoever they like and it's up to them if how they reason their nominations. I was quite surprised when they plotted for next week's nominations, nobody mentioned Benedict and Lauren and whoever is saved from that eviction. They just talked about entirely different people.

[Jords]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Or maybe the two with highest votes would be immune? Or one, whichever

Yeah! Or get the other HMs to vote... after they just nominated them

[BBDodge]

So far it would have made no difference to this series.

[joeysteele]

Not sure I could agree with it really, who get's it as others say above, if 4 or more were up.The public would be saving 3 of them with maybe a small number of votes between them too.
I think I agree with housemates being able to nominate anyone each week unless immunity has been earned via a task or whatever.

I may be persuaded that if someone has been up for eviction 2 or 3 weeks in a row though that a respite week could be introduced in that case.

I really don't like the nominations being meddled with though,hated the talking about nominations, nominations was the thing I liked from starting to watch BB and so overall I would make no changes to the format.

[BarryMayo01]

I love it, stops the same person from being up and then its almost a huge risk to nominate someone you hate, them survive and then they have all the power next week, stops people being victims all the time

[mycarImissu]

Originally Posted by BarryMayo01

I love it, stops the same person from being up and then its almost a huge risk to nominate someone you hate, them survive and then they have all the power next week, stops people being victims all the time

Spot on!

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Craiggy

I had this random idea just come to me. Wouldnt it be good if after surviving an eviction you gained immunity from next weeks vote? Say if it was Lydia V Ash. Lydia stays and therefore is immune from nominations next week?

It means more housemates are prone to being evicted instead of them targetting the same old people. And there fans having to spend the most money etc.!

Originally Posted by Jords

Yeah this is the problem. Unless they compete for it?

OMG I was thinking about this the other day!!
Its a amazing idea and it would shake up the game a little.
Tbh I think we should be the producers, I have seen allot of good ideas on the forum much better than there ideas.

[Marc]

Interesting...

[billy123]

No the shows already in a mess from making it even more trashy without messing with the format even more.

[Gstar]

I agree to a certain extent..

This should only be allowed with a 1 one 1 eviction

[Gstar]

I agree to a certain extent..

This should only be allowed with a 1 one 1 eviction

[starry]

I prefer HMs competing for immunity in a challenge, more exciting and unpredictable. A task with some real consequences for a change, and not just another funny or, as they normally are, boring group task.