[Petershaw1984]

Would this work? Or would it still have the same outcome?

[rinkydinkpanther]

it is a nomination to save

[Petershaw1984]

No it isnt its a nominate to evict and we vote to save......

[rinkydinkpanther]

Originally Posted by pio5ukuk

No it isnt its a nominate to evict and we vote to save......

oh sorry my mistake, very interesting idea that is....hmmmm.....has anyone thought of that before? just wondering how that would play out though? would it reward groups too much?

[cfromhx02]

Originally Posted by pio5ukuk

No it isnt its a nominate to evict and we vote to save......

That'd be a lot better but then you wouldn't have the opportunities for the bad ones to pick on their victims for fun and deliberately block vote them up for eviction which BB seems to think is the way to go for their ratings and it'd spoiled the fun that a lot of viewers seem to get from that.
I personally, I know, with a lot of others, would much prefer it that way. Because then people would be voting for who they liked the most, making for a much better atmosphere and taking away the opportunity for a lot of the bullying where they can't say or do much back because they know they will be put up for eviction.



There are other ways to create entertainment as I've said before. It is Big Brother's and Endemol's responsibility to give us entertainment and they can do that with tasks which bring out the fun in the good housemates Too and which is more likely to happen if they don't feel under pressure or stressed out cause they have to take Sh*t from the gangs when they aren't able to fight back.

[Marcus.]

Originally Posted by pio5ukuk

Would this work? Or would it still have the same outcome?

i would love that

[Locke.]

I think we'd probably see the likes of Scott and Becky then, not really in either group they are just floating about. The group members would likely vote for each other.

[swinearefine]

They did it in BB6, and I think Kemal and Orlaith were up. It wouldn't hurt to try it this week and see if people from the awful group go up.

[Petershaw1984]

It would mean a few being up,
Who would the following vote for?
Ashliegh? Conor and shevone
Conor? Ashliegh and arron
Becky? Scott and who?

Ashleigh and conors nominate to save would be very interesting and i dont think either woukd save luke s

[fruit_cake]

it would be interesting to see, but C5 seem very uninterested in changing the current formula.

[Samuel.]

Bad idea. A group of three could make their way to the final with ease. You wouldn't need many votes to save yourself.

As it is now, anyone could go up. It's harder for groups to save themselves.

[chuff me dizzy]

I prefer vote to evict rather than vote to save

[Niamh.]

Now there's an interesting idea, even they did it every second week or something

[Petershaw1984]

It would be good if they just told them to nominate as normal then kn the diary room tell them its a nomination to save and they cant talk about it upon leaving the diary room

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by pio5ukuk

It would be good if they just told them to nominate as normal then kn the diary room tell them its a nomination to save and they cant talk about it upon leaving the diary room

ah clever Pio, that'd be very interesting

[Josy]

I prefer nominations to stay the way they have always been