[Razor]

If vote to evict was still in place would we be seeing different housemates in the house?

So with this in mind would you like to see 'Vote to Evict' brought back?

[Munchkins]

No, i'm glad its vote to save. - i like being able to put my favourite through each time they are up

[Flamingjoe]

I only like vote to save when they're are three or more nominees, otherwise it's just pointless.

With a vote to evict, the evictions probably would have gone like this:

Week 1 (Conor, Lydia and Victoria): Lydia
Week 2 (Arron and Chris): Chris
Week 3 (Benedict and Lauren): Benedict
Week 4 (Deana and Lydia): Lydia
Week 5 (Arron, Becky, Conor and Deana): Conor
Week 6 (Conor and Shievonne): Shievonne
Week 7 (Lauren and Luke A): Lauren
Week 8 (Adam, Ashleigh, Caroline, Conor, Deana, Luke A, Luke S and Sara): Caroline
Week 9 (Ashleigh, Becky, Deana and Luke A): Becky

So, it wouldn't have changed much.

Overall, I think I proffered vote to evict because I felt like I had more control over the evictions.

[Black Dagger]

Vote to save hasn't really worked this series anyway.

Caroline going over Ashleigh for start

But no... vote to evict is ****ing ridiculous... because morons who think watching paint dry is exhilerating and evict most of the decent house-mates.

[Marc]

Both have their disadvantages. Usually with the vote to evict you lose good, entertaining housemates early on. And with vote to save you might lose one of your favourites because you think they're save.

But overall vote to save is fairer because fans get a chance to save who they want rather than evict out of hatred.

[Niamh.]

Well, I would have said No until this task came up, atleast the nasty HMs would have been gone by now and wouldn't be getting the same as the winner

[billy123]

Yes! i always hated the idea of vote to save and it has proved to be a bad move it removes so much power from the viewers it is awful.

[joeysteele]

No,I don't want vote to evict back and in any case we have had 5 evictions out of 8 which only had 2 housemates up for eviction so in effect either vote to evict or save was in place for those anyway.

I would like to see in future series more housemates up week after week rather than just 2, in part this was encouraged far more by the talking about nominations in the first weeks of the series but definately not, no way do I want vote to evict to be brought back again.
That is one of the best things BB on Channel 5 brought in, the vote to save.

[Livia]

They're damned if they do and damned if they don't.

[chuff me dizzy]

Yes, vote to evict for me ,I think it is much fairer

[halfacrown]

Vote to evict was far better and usually resulted in the *rseholes being dealt with swiftly. I'd like to see all the housemates up a couple of times and some surprise evictions. Please also remove family nominations and screwing with the prize money.

[Jordan.]

Vote to save with atleast three up next series (hopefully).

[Marmalite]

If they're going to continue messing around and engineering with who they put in tasks to get a free ticket to the final and then basically handing over half of the prize money to someone who is an absolute twat, then yes they need to change it back to vote to evict and ensure they put the entire house up for eviction (and a double eviction at that) before they start messing.

[Withano]

Just ejections from the house when apt. I love vote to save. Can you imagine if they done that from the start? Jon Tikkle would have won, Rachel Rice would not have! Charley Uchea would have made the final, most of the disability-sob-story-characters would not have.

[smeagol]

The show would be a lot different right now if it was vote to evict and i would of voted more.
conor becky would of been gone by now

[mirak_eel]

How anyone prefers vote to evict, is beyond me.
If it wasn't for vote to save, Aaron wouldn't have won last year, he would have been evicted if it was vote to evict. Vote to save allows entertaining housemates to stay longer, and gets rid of bores (if theyre put up for eviction, which hasnt happened this year).
If vote to save had been introduced earlier on, Nikki Grahame, Victor, Derek, Makosi, and many others, would have made it to the final of their' respective series', and maybe even won.

Vote to save >>>>> Vote to evict.

[mirak_eel]

Oh yes, and Jon Tickle would have won too.

[AshesonMars]

I preferred vote to evict for pretty much the same reason others have already stated on here.

[Gillian-73]

Keep vote to save, with at least 3 people up each week.

[Marcus.]

keep changing it so it keep the on the toes

[Razor]

Originally Posted by smeagol

The show would be a lot different right now if it was vote to evict and i would of voted more.
conor becky would of been gone by now

Very true.

[glasstangerine]

I am sure they make more money on vote to save. I doubt it will ever change

[sampvt]

If the vote to evict was in this year, Deana would be popping zits at home eating cereal with her fingers week 2. Chuff, Vanessa and me alone would have put the bitch in her place. I would sell the car and the dog to get that twot out she make my teeth itch and hair hurt. I still have nightmares about her eating that carrot with open mouth and saliva dribbling off her botoxed bottom lip, ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[Jords]

Vote to Save is amazing cant believe people want evict back, thats the big characters gone with a click of a finger seriously.

[sampvt]

Vote to save is the producers fav as it protects the likes of Aaron, Becky, Conor and Deana. It also draws in more cash by a mile. BB is no longer a viewer participation program, its contrived by the producers and we are expected to fund it, hence the drop in numbers and votes over the years. Give us the program back and the vote to evict and it will get good again.