FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-20762437
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Half-Wit Zeus
|
Is there more to this? Sounds awful. Going through so much surgery to incorporate the lungs of a poor somebody-else who already had difficulties, but still had the heart to donate themselves. Double-tragic.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Tragic Error
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
|
|||
Guest
|
I have sympathy with all parties here. Donated organs are in a severely short supply. I carry a donor card but don't know of many others that do, even though most of us support it.
I can only presume that they would have checked the lungs first, before agreeing to use them. I'm guessing the woman wasn't given a choice of 5 to pick from. She may not have lived as long as she did without those lungs. Nature has a way of killing us off when for no apparent reason. If I was ill and I was offered another 2 years to spend with my loved ones, I'd probably take it. Sometimes **** just happens. |
||
![]() |
#7 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
I'm on the donor list, but pretty sure not many body parts will be of much use to anyone once I go..I told them they can take anything except my eyes. Even though I will be dead the thought of people touching my eyes makes my skin crawl ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
|
|||
Guest
|
That really made me laugh.
|
||
![]() |
#9 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
This is an unforgiveable error by the Health authorities, they surely have a duty to disclose such an important fact as it could (and did) lead to a much shorter potential lifespan for this recipient than if the lungs were from a non smoker.
Nobody can say this wouldn't have happened to the recipient even with a non smokers donated lungs, but surely the chances would have been lower.The family had a right to know all the facts surrounding this issue so they would be better placed to decide on whether the transplant goes ahead...!!! |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I wouldn't have thought a smoker could donate lungs etc but I tend to agree with what JHC said too. The only error is if they had not explained the risks to the transplantee which in this case it sounds like they didn't. A very sad tale.
I carry a donor card and hope I could be of help to someone in the event of my death.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Also not all smokers get cancer or whatever.
'The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust said: "It is very rare for patients to specify that they do not wish to be considered for clinically healthy lungs from smokers. ' implies that the lungs were tested and didnt have a problem at the time of the transplant. The hospital couldnt really have known that 2 years down the line there would be a problem if the lungs were healthy at the time. I really doubt she would have refused the lungs just on the fact that the donor was a smoker, if she was told that they were healthy (at that time) Last edited by Vicky.; 18-12-2012 at 11:49 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The donor card issue is another thing that needs looking at to IMO. I think (although please correct me if I am wrong) but even though you carry a card your next of Kin makes the ultimate decision which I think is wrong as it must be so difficult to agree to having your loved one kept alive to be operated on so I think some people refuse in shock.
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|