[cizzah97]

I mean ffs guys so many threads saying "omg the series is ruined VTE is back omg rip BB" seriously what does it matter?

If its vote to evict you'll pick up the phone and vote for the HM you want gone

If its vote to save you'll pick up the phone and vote for the HM you want to stay.

simple as, don't make a mountain out of a molehill...

[Jack_]

Just looking at your favourites...you do realise Speidi would have gone in the first week with vote to evict?

[Scream]

well it can effectively change the whole show...there's more than two housemates up therefore in a vote to evict, a big character will go. vote to save, they probably wont...

[reece(:]

I understand the frustration but think it is a bit OTT since this is what we were stuck with with the apparent superior C4 BBs.

[cizzah97]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Just looking at your favourites...you do realise Speidi would have gone in the first week with vote to evict?

I really don't understand how?:L seeing as it was VTS in January surely they would have got the least amount of votes if that was the case??

[Jack_]

Originally Posted by cizzah97

I really don't understand how?:L seeing as it was VTS in January surely they would have got the least amount of votes if that was the case??

eh...what are you on about

What I'm saying is that if vote to evict had been the system in January, Speidi would've got the most votes to evict first week and would have gone. They were only saved because of vote to save. Divisive characters are dead meat with a negative voting system, they are safe as houses (generally) with a positive one

[armand.kay]

Because with vote to save the housemate with the most fans gets saves but with vote to evict the one with the most haters leave.

[JPG2502]

Originally Posted by cizzah97

I really don't understand how?:L seeing as it was VTS in January surely they would have got the least amount of votes if that was the case??

You are joking right ??
Speidi would have been first out. They were Marmite characters,

I'm still scratching my head as to why they have changed it to evict, speidi, for example would have cost them a lot of money, surely the best way of protecting there investments is to keep VTS forever.



http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/big_brother_2013

[Ramsay]

Take CBB9 for example..do you really think people would of picked up the phone to evict Kirk and Natalie in that double eviction? not a hope..they got evicted then because they were BORING
If it were VOE, Michael and The Twins would of gone without a doubt

[Vicky.]

I dont quite understand the uproar. The classic BBs were still good despite VTE. Yes, the bitches would have probably stayed a bit longer if it was VTS, but noone really cared back then, the series' were still good.

C5 didnt do VTS right anyway. It was nearly always head to heads, which is the same as VTE.

Only time it should be VTS is if there are 4 or more housemates up. And especially when the whole house is up.

[Withano]

The classic BBs with VTE had to fix the system a little.. Charleys fake eviction.. Aisleyne being in that bedsit for a fortnight.. Nikki and Grace being bought into the house..

VTS is the obvious correct thing to do. Whoever decided to change it back should sit in a corner and think about what he has done.

[Scream]

Originally Posted by JPG2502

You are joking right ??
Speidi would have been first out. They were Marmite characters,

I'm still scratching my head as to why they have changed it to evict, speidi, for example would have cost them a lot of money, surely the best way of protecting there investments is to keep VTS forever.



http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/big_brother_2013

Jack is saying if it was vote to evict Speidi would of been first out. My god.

[Tregard]

I was considering making a visual guide explaining why Vote To Save makes more sense. I shall do this on Friday so you can understand why I think this

[Jordan.]

It does suck but people saying the ratings deserve to fall because of it are going too far.

[JPG2502]

Originally Posted by Scream

Jack is saying if it was vote to evict Speidi would of been first out. My god.

I know ...

[evanshil]

people will vote out interesting people and leave boring ones because no one will notice them

[starry]

Originally Posted by reece(:

I understand the frustration but think it is a bit OTT since this is what we were stuck with with the apparent superior C4 BBs.

That wasn't the reason it was superior?

[JPG2502]

Originally Posted by evanshil

people will vote out interesting people and leave boring ones because no one will notice them

Yes.

Callum, Daley etc will be in the final.
The producers have learnt nothing.

[DanielLuis]

Originally Posted by cizzah97

I really don't understand how?:L seeing as it was VTS in January surely they would have got the least amount of votes if that was the case??

Wait, you actually cannot understand the difference between VTE and VTS? With VTE people vote negatively, for who they want out, while with VTS they vote positively, for who they want to save. Can't you understand how different the results get?
Entertaining housemates, like Speidi, are the ones that are fan favourites, and get most love. However, they are also the one that get the most hate.
This means that while they'de be the most saved and survive eviction with VTS, they will be also the most voted with VTE, for simple reason that they are as hated as they are loved. And while they get evicted, boring housemates that do nothing, basically like the rest of Speidi's CBB housemates, will survive simply because they do nothing. That's because while they aren't loved, they aren't hated either, and as such they survive VTE's over entertaining housemates, while they'd be out in a VTS. Suzie BB7 is a pretty great example of that.