[*mazedsalv**]

I will refer you to this eviction this very night.

[Black Dagger]

You can refer us to Kirk and Sonia's eviction or Spedi's nominations as well!

[Macie Lightfoot]

VTS and VTE really doesn't make that much of a difference. If that task was any indication Dan would've had the least votes to save anyway so.

[jegmeister]

the difference is clear and always have been. Dan fans need to stop whingeing and get over it.

[*mazedsalv**]

Originally Posted by jegmeister

the difference is clear and always have been. Dan fans need to stop whingeing and get over it.

Some people haven't believed it. After the change was revealed this year, a lot said "it makes no difference".

[jegmeister]

Originally Posted by *mazedsalv**

Some people haven't believed it. After the change was revealed this year, a lot said "it makes no difference".

Well they're obviously wrong. It's quite obvious that they are different - marmite characters are always more at risk in Vote to Evict. It isn't rocket science.

[JPG2502]

Originally Posted by jegmeister

the difference is clear and always have been. Dan fans need to stop whingeing and get over it.

I'm not a Dan fan, but realise vote to evict is a pile of ****e .

[Scream]

Dan could've been at risk either way tbh

[Scotty07]

Some people still don't and probably never will.

[Lex]

Originally Posted by *mazedsalv**

I will refer you to this eviction this very night.

Your man lost!...deal with it!...if he was as good as you make out, then he would still be there!

[CaudleHalbard]

VTS was tried. People moaned like crazy. VTE was brought back and won't be going away.

It switches to VTS in the final, of course.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Scream

Dan could've been at risk either way tbh

Except that for to vote to save him all his fans would have only needed to vote for him.
Whereas under vote to evict, not knowing who was where or what,we were left with voting for 2 others thereby likely splitting the vote.

[*mazedsalv**]

Originally Posted by Lex

Your man lost!...deal with it!...if he was as good as you make out, then he would still be there!

1. He was my 3rd fave, not my first.
2. No, he wouldn't because it was vote to EVICT. Eg. Nikki got evicted with 37% of a 10 way vote in BB7, despite polling 35% of the fave votes online that year.

No matter how you spin it, you can be an incredible HM, but you will be evicted in a vote to evict. I just hope people like watching paint dry and sleeping HMs. I will be hoping Dexter/Gina do something massive to kick the others into breathing a little bit more and moving a little more.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by *mazedsalv**

1. He was my 3rd fave, not my first.
2. No, he wouldn't because it was vote to EVICT. Eg. Nikki got evicted with 37% of a 10 way vote in BB7, despite polling 35% of the fave votes online that year.

No matter how you spin it, you can be an incredible HM, but you will be evicted in a vote to evict. I just hope people like watching paint dry and sleeping HMs. I will be hoping Dexter/Gina do something massive to kick the others into breathing a little bit more and moving a little more.

But Dan polled in behind Sam and Sophie in the task so he more than likely would've gone in VTS as well.

[*mazedsalv**]

From DS:

http://s58.photobucket.com/user/yetn...445c7.png.html

Safe with 64.50% of the vote in that poll.

[Macie Lightfoot]

If you're trying to act like DS is valid and in touch with the public as a whole, maybe you shouldn't attach the VTE poll where they have Sophie going. Just a tip.

[Tregard]

Sam would've gone in a VTS, no doubt about it.

[Patrick]

Well said Salv.

Or the old BB11 Quadruple Eviction, would of gone completely different had it of been a VTS.

[Shaun]

yeah ok because sallie, wolfy and jemima went because they were just so saved...

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Scream

Dan could've been at risk either way tbh

How would he? Who out of Sam and Sophie would've got more votes than Dan on an actual vote to save? And not some stupid poll on the Internet that nobody I've seen on the Forums have said that they've voted on?

[Sophiee]

it blatantly made a difference when sallie was up for eviction too. vote to evict is never right.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Sophiee

it blatantly made a difference when sallie was up for eviction too. vote to evict is never right.

LOL that's a joke right? In what world is Sallie not the first boot.

[*mazedsalv**]

Originally Posted by Patrick

Well said Salv.

Or the old BB11 Quadruple Eviction, would of gone completely different had it of been a VTS.

Exactly! Steve, Andrew, JJ and Mario would have gone in a VTS quad. Instead we saw Steve, John James, Sam and Corin go. (three of them which had a huge following).

[Sophiee]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

LOL that's a joke right? In what world is Sallie not the first boot.

she was easily featured the most during the first week and would not have gone in a vote to save obviously. it would've probably been dexter.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

How would he? Who out of Sam and Sophie would've got more votes than Dan on an actual vote to save? And not some stupid poll on the Internet that nobody I've seen on the Forums have said that they've voted on?

True Mock. I really believe the splitting of votes between Sam and Sophie was a factor.
Had we been able to throw all our votes in to saving Dan by being able to vote for him in vote to save it would have been I am sure a different result.

It will be interesting to see if they are keeping vote to evict for CBB as well.