[alex_front2]

It means Sam's done financially better than Aaron who carried the series

[CaudleHalbard]

I have always hated 'winner takes all'.

All finalists should get something. It would make contesttants try harder to get into the final.

£100k is too much for the first prize. I suggest splitting something like this:

Winner: £70k (as it used to be)
Runner-up: £15k
Other finalists: £5k (x 3)

Thus the total prize money pot remains at £100k, with the winner getting 70% of it but not all.

[Patrick]

It's bittersweet in a way now isn't it.

We all wanted this to happen, after BB13 - but now I wish it hadn't of.

I wish Dexter had of took that money the other night for real, 88K wasn't it? Leaving Sam, with nothing but 12K - it means Dexter, the rightful winner would of legged it with the majority of the money, thus leaving his fans in a simple place; 'Okay let's vote for Gina.'

Gina would of won the other 12K, Dexter would of had 88K - two rightful winners. Ginxter all the way.

[JTM45]

Yeah, it's kinda' sh*tty that the first year in a while they don't give half of the prize money away is the year that someone who slept through most of the series and didn't even deserve half of the money bloody won all of it!

Channel 5 suck balls at running BB!!!!!

[Joelle.]

Failing what Patrick said, they should have given it to Michael so he could pay for some acting lessons.