[jonny123]

Three weeks in they should ALL be up for eviction and vote to SAVE. This way anyone who's spend 3 weeks in bed will be out.

And no....I'm not Sam bashing...........yeah ok I am

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by jonny123

Three weeks in they should ALL be up for eviction and vote to SAVE. This way anyone who's spend 3 weeks in bed will be out.

And no....I'm not Sam bashing...........yeah ok I am

[joeysteele]

Yes because none of those housemates were involved in false boring love triangles and then bored almost every highlights with daft conversation sof same night after night.
So at least with them, we got no false showmances nonsense.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

No, but would you be able to watch a house full of Dexters, Ginas and Dans? It would give me a migraine.

You need a good mix of personality types for it to work.

My thoughts exactly.It's good to have all types in there.People will vote for the person they LIKE,To win.The winner is'nt so important though.It's the whole show imo.

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Another excuse to bash Sam,fgs cant people get over the fact he WON,he was liked ,lifes tough

It's bashing Luke A and Rachel as well tbf.

[Kyle]

Originally Posted by Black Dagger

It's bashing Luke A and Rachel as well tbf.

We all know who this was aimed at for the most part considering the O.P has already made numerous Sam bashing threads In the last 2 days....

[pcro]

No I wouldnt want 15 Sams. But then agan I dont want 15 Gina's either. You need a good mix and leave it up to the public. As logn as its a good series throughout, the actual winner doesnt impact me five seconds beyond the announcement. This was a good series for two months with a few minutes of disappointment at the end. I can live with that.

[LemonJam]

No, but I certainly wouldn't watch one with 15 Dexters/Ginas/Sallies/Anyone from this series tbh either. All the housemates sucked this year.

[LemonJam]

also Rachel is REALLY nowhere near as boring as everyone makes out.

[reece(:]

Not in a million years, I'd rather save my electricity bill.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by pcro

No I wouldnt want 15 Sams. But then agan I dont want 15 Gina's either. You need a good mix and leave it up to the public. As logn as its a good series throughout, the actual winner doesnt impact me five seconds beyond the announcement. This was a good series for two months with a few minutes of disappointment at the end. I can live with that.

yup.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by LemonJam

also Rachel is REALLY nowhere near as boring as everyone makes out.

Seriously, this revisionist history is ridiculous. Rachel is NOTHING like Sam and earnt her win, same with Luke A.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showp...0&postcount=51


Genuinely LOLed at this

A house with Penny, Lee, Nush, Scott, Susie, Kara-Louise, Hira, Laura, and Luke A would actually be hilarious come to think of it.

[Mystic Mock]

While I liked Luke A, I would not want a whole series of Housemates like him and neither would anybody else as would be seen in the ratings.



And would anyone want Sam's and Rachel's in the house again?

[Josy]

I think the OP is completely pointless tbh, I doubt anyone would be interested in a house full of people the exact same, one of the reasons I watch BB is because we get a wide range of people with completely different personalities flung in to live together in an enclosed space.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by LemonJam

also Rachel is REALLY nowhere near as boring as everyone makes out.

Alright then what did Rachel have about her that was interesting? I can't remember one interesting conversation off her, I can't remember what tastes in any entertainment industry that she had, the only things that we knew that she liked was Grapes and Chickpeas.


So yes she's a terrible winner, at least Sam had likeablity unlike Rachel who pretended that Lisa was bullying her.

[CaudleHalbard]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Would you watch a BB series with 15 or so Sams, Luka As and Rachel Rices?

I wouldn't get past launch night!

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

Alright then what did Rachel have about her that was interesting? I can't remember one interesting conversation off her, I can't remember what tastes in any entertainment industry that she had, the only things that we knew that she liked was Grapes and Chickpeas.


So yes she's a terrible winner, at least Sam had likeablity unlike Rachel who pretended that Lisa was bullying her.

Uhhh idk if you even watched BB9 because Rachel is, like, the definition of UTR fun and had one of the greatest journeys in reality TV history. Dealing with relentless **** from just about everyone for daring to be pleasant and not wanting to start arguments, only to righteously slay all of her oppressors and win, it really doesn't get much better than that.

[Verbal]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I can't help but think, if we are all so content with a nice but boring winner, what's the point of putting a load of entertaining but 'nasty' people in there in the first place? As much as I feel more settled that a nice guy won the money, the fact that the housemates are clearly mostly picked on entertainment factor should indicate that the "winner" should be someone entertaining.

This is a thread from DS. It mad me It's from Teeky pie.

Let me start by saying that yes I would.

Let me finish by saying that I did find the other housemates entertaining, a bit like a bear in a zoo, or the jeremy kyle show.

I just didn't want to see any of them financially rewarded for being idiots.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

Uhhh idk if you even watched BB9 because Rachel is, like, the definition of UTR fun and had one of the greatest journeys in reality TV history. Dealing with relentless **** from just about everyone for daring to be pleasant and not wanting to start arguments, only to righteously slay all of her oppressors and win, it really doesn't get much better than that.

I did watch BB9 and it was quite different to how you mentioned it lol.

[Redway]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

Another excuse to bash Sam,fgs cant people get over the fact he WON,he was liked ,lifes tough

This. He got the most votes and won and there have only been one or two (literally) series where the person I wanted to win actually did win. It's just a TV show.

I'm also getting sick of people basically being told what to like, as if others can't have differing opinions.

[pcro]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

Alright then what did Rachel have about her that was interesting? I can't remember one interesting conversation off her, I can't remember what tastes in any entertainment industry that she had, the only things that we knew that she liked was Grapes and Chickpeas.


So yes she's a terrible winner, at least Sam had likeablity unlike Rachel who pretended that Lisa was bullying her.

Well, she defied Big Brother and did the washing up when she wasnt supposed to becasue she felt oh so guilty about a haves and have nots task as I recall. So, there's that.

[LemonJam]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

Alright then what did Rachel have about her that was interesting? I can't remember one interesting conversation off her, I can't remember what tastes in any entertainment industry that she had, the only things that we knew that she liked was Grapes and Chickpeas.


So yes she's a terrible winner, at least Sam had likeablity unlike Rachel who pretended that Lisa was bullying her.

from what I remember

- Standing up for Rebecca against Alexandra "MEMBA I TOLD YOU" Gale
- Being a judge in the competition where they have to recreate landmarks out of cake and rewarding Mikey & Kat's team who just took the piss and created a complete ****heap of cake over Rex and Darnells team who actually put in a lot of effort and vaguely looked like the building they were trying to replicate. <3
- Standing her ground and being completely righteous whenever Rex took the piss out of her.
- ****zing the **** out over the most mudane **** (grapes, chickpeas, goldfish)
- Sacrificing her letter from home to get everyone elses and then not letting them know that she sacrificed hers is probably one of the most heartwarming BB moments we've had
- "Are you black, Darnell?"
- When Stuarts self-victimizing himself saying "The public are miscontruing me as arrogant" And Rachel just telling him "Yeah, you are! ^_^" <3

She's just a generally positive, rootable and sometimes endearing character with plenty of content for her to be a decent winner. Hell, I wasn't even a big Rachel fan but she's really not as dire as everyone makes out.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

I did watch BB9 and it was quite different to how you mentioned it lol.

No that's pretty much how it happened, Rachel's win was huge poetic justice and easily the most satisfying outcome of BB9 from a narrative perspective.

[karezza]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

No that's pretty much how it happened, Rachel's win was huge poetic justice and easily the most satisfying outcome of BB9 from a narrative perspective.

Rachel was a terrible housemate. She is dull, insipid, anodyne and boring. She won because the great Rex picked on her a bit. She doesn't have a personality and shouldn't have won.