[LukeB]

do you think big brother should do the 1st evictions 2 weeks after they entered because, to me 1 week is not good enough we might of got rid of someone who could possibly be a good housemate!?

[Adamw92]

I wouldn't mind if they tried it out, 16 days to get to know them all is better than 9 afterall.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Adamw92

I wouldn't mind if they tried it out, 16 days to get to know them all is better than 9 afterall.

tamara could of been a interested housemate imo but we wont ever find out

[Adamw92]

Originally Posted by LukeB

tamara could of been a interested housemate imo but we wont ever find out

Maybe but if they'd waited until Week 2 and the same 3 were nominated, I still think she'd be the right one to go.

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Adamw92

Maybe but if they'd waited until Week 2 and the same 3 were nominated, I still think she'd be the right one to go.

the friends with helen curse?

[Adamw92]

Originally Posted by LukeB

the friends with helen curse?

Maybe a little. But at the time Jale was quite popular and Danielle was providing talking points that made them more relevant so I think everyone would have targeted Tamara in a block vote to save those 2 just like they actually did in Week 1 I'm assuming.

[kefln]

I think they used to give more time for the HMs to settle in, then they added to the "excitement" by kicking people out ASAP.

[JoshBB]

Even a double eviction on the second week would be better tbh.

[rubymoo]

I agree, 1 week isn't long enough to get to know the housemates, they should keep them all in for at least 2 weeks then do a double eviction, or a regular eviction and a midweek, no nominations, just the bottom 2 to go.....easy!