FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
23-02-2015, 03:36 PM | #151 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
I corrected you then remember? When you start involving 'the forum' in your posts know that 'the forum' has the right to reply. I have been involved in this discussion from the off I don't intend to be railroaded off. If you don't want to respond to me that's fine.
__________________
Last edited by Kizzy; 23-02-2015 at 03:37 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
23-02-2015, 04:14 PM | #152 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
To 'Contradict', then be replied to with a valid 'Response' which rebuts the contradiction with clear 'Evidence', only to 'Ignore' then make the same 'Contradiction' To 'Misrepresent', then be replied to with a valid response which 'Exposes' the 'Misrepresentation' by the use of clear 'Evidence', only to 'Ignore' then persist with the same 'Misrepresentation' is very wearing, and is not conducive to proper discussion or debate, but does, instead, always result in futility and bad feeling. Just putting that out there. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
23-02-2015, 04:53 PM | #153 | ||
|
|||
-
|
The question remains, though. If all tibbers are circular arguers and most circular arguers are tibbers, how many angry tibby rants does it take to bring down a multinational terrorist organisation?
I can't claim to know the answer but I will for damned sure be here to find out!! |
||
Reply With Quote |
23-02-2015, 04:54 PM | #154 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
23-02-2015, 05:05 PM | #155 | ||
|
|||
-
|
So what you're saying is... That 42 rants against Islamic extremism would cancel out Islamic extremism? And if 42 is the meaning of life, then "anti 42" is the inverse of the meaning of life. So, it then follows, that Islamic extremism is the meaning of life??
*suspicious* Is that really jew, Livia? Or some sort of Islamic imposter? |
||
Reply With Quote |
23-02-2015, 05:24 PM | #156 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Quote:
I won't mention to my father you think I am Islamic imposter for fear he will burst into flames. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
23-02-2015, 05:41 PM | #157 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
23-02-2015, 06:45 PM | #158 | |||
|
||||
All hail the Moyesiah
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
23-02-2015, 09:17 PM | #159 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-02-2015, 06:22 AM | #160 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
As for your statement; "I'm not interested in your opinion on my interaction with other members", then this is a DIRECT CONTRADICTION of your statement to Livia in your post no. 151, in which you state: "When you start involving 'the forum' in your posts know that 'the forum' has the right to reply". So it is alright for you to claim democratic process when it suits you, but you deny other forum members the same democratic right when it doesn't suit you? Further, and to be exact; I was not just voicing my opinion on your "interaction with other members", because you are guilty of the very same 'Circular Argument (and other 'Strawman' techniques) in your discussions with me on this thread, and with me on virtually every other thread on this forum, and therefore, my concern for "other members" suffering from your circular argument tactics was in reality, just secondary to my primary concern of your use of such tactics in discussions with me. Finally, this is not a personal attack; it is FAIR COMMENT - A STATEMENT OF FACTS, made in the honest hope that, once highlighted for you, you will desist from using such tactics, thereby ensuring more honest, reasoned debate, because all Strawman tactics merely impoverish a debate/discussion by causing such members who they are employed against, to resist joining in discussions - deterred by an inescapable sense of futility. It is, after all, a democratic discussion forum, where 'right to reply' is afforded to every member. Last edited by kirklancaster; 24-02-2015 at 06:24 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-02-2015, 12:53 PM | #161 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
It is coming across as tag teaming kirk.
Anyone has the right to post yes, but I'd appreciate it if you discussed the topic and not me, this is serious debates and this is a sensitive subject.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-02-2015, 01:33 PM | #162 | |||
|
||||
The Italian Job
|
Some people have been posting these videos on facebook. I don't want to see that on my timeline.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-02-2015, 01:48 PM | #163 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I agree with you that this should be a serious debate on a sensitive nature, and my posts are always serious in nature and the passion I write with very sincere, but I admit that - just like your good self - I do become frivolous in reaction to frivolity, and I do tend to 'follow suit' when a thread deviates from the original topic. Anyway, I suggest we leave it there. We have not fallen out or lapsed into personal insult (something I am genuinely pleased about) and I look forward to further debate/discussion with you. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
24-02-2015, 01:56 PM | #164 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|