[Mystic Mock]

It had no villains in the series?

I'm interested because most BB's (and TV Shows in general) have villains that we all love or love to hate.

But would you be interested in watching a series of Big Brother without no Grace, Makosi, Bea, Adele, Jade Goody, Sezer, Sree, or Luke types?

I personally love villains on BB, and find it very hard when the show's equivalent to your Cersei Lannister, the Cylons, or Norman Bates gets properly hated on and evicted.

However I would check it out as a fascinating experiment.

Poll will be coming shortly.

[Jamie89]

I usually like villains on BB too but I'd still watch it without. As long as the characters are interesting they don't have to have specific traits for me to enjoy it.

[Jay28jay2]

Yes... It's still Big Brother

We need more fun in the house, the drama gets tedious after a while

[Dominic]

Yeah I've grown to appreciate the nicer and UTRfun housemates lately.

[Jason.]

Idk, it depends.

Some villains make really good housemates (Makosi, Grace, etc) but some are just unbearable and forced down our throats by the producers (Marc, Perez). It's good to have a mix imo instead of just a house full of villains or a house full of nice people.

[thisisdanny]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

It had no villains in the series?
But would you be interested in watching a series of Big Brother without no Grace, Makosi, Bea, Adele, Jade Goody, Sezer, Sree, or Luke types?

Are you sure

[Dominic]

Originally Posted by thisisdanny

Are you sure

Sree was great tho

[Shaun]

Depends how they're treated by the producers... if they're given all sorts of unfair advantages and rigged into staying 4 more weeks than they naturally should, then no, but if they emerge as some kind of standard hated housemate that makes it as far as they can on their own then I'm fine with that.

[joeysteele]

Yes I would.

[T*]

It would honestly be refreshing

[jennyjuniper]

The BB house needs a little bit of everything to be truly interesting, which includes at least one villain. However I would watch a series without a villain if the housemates were interesting enough.

[nonstop]

Maybe.

[Strictly Jake]

Yes I would still watch but the villains are always my favourite

[Maxxie.]

The problem is, from BB5 onwards there will always be the villian in the house and there's nothi you could do about it. Someone would just become the villian even if they weren't casted for it. I don't think much people predicted Stephanie Davis to be the villian on launch night and I never expected Becky or Wolfy to also end up in that place, they were both really sweet and bubbly at the start, it takes it's toll.

[jennyjuniper]

Originally Posted by Bb2014

The problem is, from BB5 onwards there will always be the villian in the house and there's nothi you could do about it. Someone would just become the villian even if they weren't casted for it. I don't think much people predicted Stephanie Davis to be the villian on launch night and I never expected Becky or Wolfy to also end up in that place, they were both really sweet and bubbly at the start, it takes it's toll.

I agree. It also depends who they align themselves with. Becky was okay until she teamed up with Conor and his cronies. I don't know what happened to Wolfie. I started off liking her...and then didn't.

[Ashley.]

Definitely, because it means the drama will involve different people rather than the same person every time. That's what I dislike about just having the one "bad guy"; they're always in the middle of the drama and it just gets tedious.

[Mystic Mock]

Wolfy had disgusting habits which didn't help her imo.

[Jason.]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Wolfy had disgusting habits which didn't help her imo.

Her downfall was that "I know I'm going to be in the final" and "I'm staying on Friday" comment which made her come across as cocksure and arrogant after hearing the cheers she got in Week 1/2.