FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20-06-2016, 11:31 AM | #51 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 11:50 AM | #52 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
We also know little of their methods so it's tricky to gauge guilt by simply looking at how long an investigation lasts. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 12:22 PM | #53 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
The more people who come forward over time I would have thought makes it easier to gauge guilt not less, as every case has to be assessed on it's own merit. It can't be assured that Cliffs file will remain closed, should someone else come forward it will be reopened.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 01:15 PM | #54 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 01:25 PM | #55 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 03:29 PM | #56 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
I'd like to see him do so too.
The file is closed, they are not even looking for any evidence now, the evidence they claimed to have, did not stand up. He has nothing at all to answer to and no prospect of ever having to do so either. I am pleased he got an apology from the Police too for how they handled the search issue at his home. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 03:34 PM | #57 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 03:39 PM | #58 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
I find it infuriating that people can accuse someone of something falsely and still be able to hide behind not being able to be named. I understand,Cliff for instance has gone to the USA for tennis tournaments for decades, once this came out, he was told he could not go last year. Shocking. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 03:44 PM | #59 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
jim davidson had 13 liars they all dropped their lies....just because he was once in the same building as jimmy saville
|
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 03:56 PM | #60 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
All I said that It's tricky to gauge guilt simply by how long the case lasted because we don't know the facts of the investigation. I don't know why you're taking exception to that and stating the obvious. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 04:07 PM | #61 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Yewtree wasn't confined to the BBC or the 70's either, I'm not taking exception to anything I agree we don't know all the facts, a closed file is not a guarantee of innocence.
That said I feel for the guy being victim of trial by media thus far.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 06:13 PM | #62 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts". Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003) .................................................. .. Press The Spoiler Button to See All My Songs Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 06:57 PM | #63 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Some people think it could've been because of Crimewatch.Maybe a criminal she had locked up ordered the hit.We might never know. |
||
Reply With Quote |
20-06-2016, 07:45 PM | #64 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
many said dando was re jimmy saville case allegedly
|
||
Reply With Quote |
21-06-2016, 12:30 AM | #65 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Yeah, let's go down the route of having it be possible to charge or sue anyone who makes an assault claim against someone when it isn't upheld.
... I hope the reasons for this not being a good thing are pretty obvious. Seriously, no matter what anyone personally chooses to believe, let's remember that this file has been closed specifically because it has not / can not be proven, and NOT because it has been proven to be false. |
||
Reply With Quote |
21-06-2016, 02:52 AM | #66 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
21-06-2016, 06:59 AM | #67 | ||
|
|||
-
|
If it can be proven that they were lying, sure, but being unable to find enough evidence to convict someone of what an accuser is claiming is not the same as proving that the accuser's claims are false.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|