[the truth]

Shouted over throughout by the other leaders?

Call that a debate?

so the awkward subject of border control immigration, radical terrorism, jihadis allowed to re-enter our country, rising population by 10 million in 25 years etc were as usual not allowed to be discussed on bbc political debates and were shouted down as usual by the usual far left radical intolerant liberal tory hating angry mob...so much for a balanced audience too

[Rob!]

Yes it is totally correct, and always should be so.

[jennyjuniper]

Originally Posted by the truth

Shouted over throughout by the other leaders?

Call that a debate?

so the awkward subject of border control immigration, radical terrorism, jihadis allowed to re-enter our country, rising population by 10 million in 25 years etc were as usual not allowed to be discussed on bbc political debates and were shouted down as usual by the usual far left radical intolerant liberal tory hating angry mob...so much for a balanced audience too

It's a typical leftist move. They don't have the intellect to have a reasoned debate, so just shout louder to cover this fact. The left don't believe in free speech anymore, well not if you oppose them anyway.,

[joeysteele]

No it isn't right they weren't allowed to speak.
Sadly I think Nuttall got to say too much and very little of which was noteworthy in any way.

Most being just his usual prejudiced nonsense.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

No it isn't right they weren't allowed to speak.
Sadly I think Nuttall got to say too much and very little of which was noteworthy in any way.

Most being just his usual prejudiced nonsense.

I find your reply here offensive. this is a debate its meant to be a democracy. he is a legitimate party leader and he wasnt allowed to speak he was shouted over by bullies. he was the only 1 with the guts to mention jihadis, border control , rising population. major problems and issues the other spineless cowards have refused to address

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by the truth

I find your reply here offensive. this is a debate its meant to be a democracy. he is a legitimate party leader and he wasnt allowed to speak he was shouted over by bullies. he was the only 1 with the guts to mention jihadis, border control , rising population. major problems and issues the other spineless cowards have refused to address

I didn't and never have said he shouldn't be able to speak, he was allowed to speak as they all were.
Whether I like what he says is neither here nor there.
For me he got to say too much possibly,I'd rather have heard more from Caroline Lucas in fact.
Who perhaps said much less but more effectively.

I said he was allowed to speak,nowhere stating he should not be allowed to at all.

As for being offended,I guess I could be justified to take offence at your endless misrepresentations as to the Labour Party,instead I just choose to ignore them.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by the truth

I find your reply here offensive. this is a debate its meant to be a democracy. he is a legitimate party leader and he wasnt allowed to speak he was shouted over by bullies. he was the only 1 with the guts to mention jihadis, border control , rising population. major problems and issues the other spineless cowards have refused to address

PMSL Next time you get on your high horse about people being too PC I'll quote your words here.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

PMSL Next time you get on your high horse about people being too PC I'll quote your words here.

PC gone mad DR

[smudgie]

They were all shouted over.
Like squabbling kids in a playground.
They all had chance to answer each question individually but chose to interrupt each other all the time.
Silly really as nobody gets heard.

[Northern Monkey]

Not surprising tbf.He was outnumbered by the left.
He is the only one speaking about this stuff.
Everyone else tries to brush it under the carpet.
I can't really see how it would've gone much different.
People see it happening though and it only serves to make the people who feel like they aren't being represented more annoyed.That kind of suppression of voices is why people like Le Pen get so much support.
I think Labour should take the issue far more seriously to regain many of their old supporters who left them.It would be a wise move for them to take a stronger stance.

[DemolitionRed]

Labour did say that they would come down hard to ensure cheap Labour stops. At least Labour recognize that much of our hardship in large multi cultural areas comes from undercutting the British man trying to survive on a minimum wage.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Rob!

Yes it is totally correct, and always should be so.

So you love shutting down the opinions of others if you don't like them - a true believer in democracy.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by jennyjuniper

It's a typical leftist move. They don't have the intellect to have a reasoned debate, so just shout louder to cover this fact. The left don't believe in free speech anymore, well not if you oppose them anyway.,

Great post!!!!!!!

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

So you love shutting down the opinions of others if you don't like them - a true believer in democracy.

Yes when they're divisive and dangerous to communities.

[Tozzie]

Originally Posted by jennyjuniper

It's a typical leftist move. They don't have the intellect to have a reasoned debate, so just shout louder to cover this fact. The left don't believe in free speech anymore, well not if you oppose them anyway.,

This

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by reece(:

Yes when they're divisive and dangerous to communities.

That's just opinion. I feel exactly the same way about your views.

What about the increased danger you want to put us all in by mass immigration and the inevitable increase in terrorists getting free movement in our country. Who are you to think you have the right to do that?