FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
BB18 Big Brother 18 UK was shown on Channel 5 in June and July 2017, and was won by Isabelle with Raph second. Discuss the series here.
Housemates (tags):
Andrew,
Arthur,
Chanelle,
Charlotte,
Deborah,
Ellie,
Hannah,
Imran,
Isabelle,
Joe,
Kayleigh,
Kieran,
Lotan,
Mandy,
Raph,
Rebecca,
Sam,
Savannah,
Simone,
Sue,
Sukhvinder,
Tom,
HM Fan clubs (appreciation) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-06-2017, 02:54 PM | #26 | |||
|
||||
laura carter stan
|
Quote:
Last edited by Greg!; 08-06-2017 at 02:55 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 02:55 PM | #27 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 02:56 PM | #28 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
She obviously said racism to make how she discriminates sound not as bad, idiot, I liked her as well until I heard her say that. Shallow, sexist bitch
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 02:56 PM | #29 | |||
|
||||
laura carter stan
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 02:57 PM | #30 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 02:57 PM | #31 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 02:57 PM | #32 | |||
|
||||
-
|
Sukhvinder educating the ignorant
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 02:58 PM | #33 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Yes. this is the true travesty in this little exchange
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 02:58 PM | #34 | |||
|
||||
laura carter stan
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:09 PM | #35 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:10 PM | #36 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Rebecca was right
discrimination dɪˌskrɪmɪˈneɪʃ(ə)n/Submit noun 1. the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex. "victims of racial discrimination" synonyms: prejudice, bias, bigotry, intolerance, narrow-mindedness, unfairness, inequity, favouritism, one-sidedness, partisanship; More 2. recognition and understanding of the difference between one thing and another. "discrimination between right and wrong" synonyms: differentiation, distinction, telling the difference "the discrimination between right and wrong" |
||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:11 PM | #37 | |||
|
||||
I Cant Breathe
|
I think the law states you can not discriminate in a work place which includes forcing employees to wear make up
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:12 PM | #38 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Emplyers reserve the right to have a dress code so why not a make up code. They are after all paying you for your services. Too many idiots think they have rights and can do what they want. You wouldnt go to Macdonalds and expect to be able to turn up in shorts and flip flops for work
|
||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:13 PM | #39 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Just because lots of people do it doesn't make it right
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:14 PM | #40 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:14 PM | #41 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:15 PM | #42 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:17 PM | #43 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
As long as they look presentable and are doing the job they shouldn't have a say in whether or not you wear make up.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:17 PM | #44 | |||
|
||||
I Cant Breathe
|
Actually you can not make them do anything like a few years back a woman took her boss to work for making her wear high heels and won
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:20 PM | #45 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Discrimination - the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:22 PM | #46 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I agree. I remember when i was at college they used to make people wear makeup and if you didn't you would be sent home. Its so stupid i dont like that women at all, shes strikes me as extremely shallow.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:22 PM | #47 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
You couldn't turn up to work in Boots in a hoody and jeans
|
||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:23 PM | #48 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:23 PM | #49 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Exactly. Discrimination isn't actually racism but it could be something a racist person does because they're racist, they could also call a person names or attack them which isn't discrimination but things racist people might do
__________________
Spoiler: Last edited by Niamh.; 08-06-2017 at 03:26 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
08-06-2017, 03:25 PM | #50 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Gender-based dress codes and grooming standards are a sort of exception to the usual rules about workplace sex discrimination. In all other respects, employers are required to treat men and women equally. Employers may not impose different rules or requirements on women than on men. For example, an employer could not legally require women to have more experience than men to be hired for a position, nor could they require women to arrive at work an hour earlier than men. In general, employers cannot create different performance, productivity, or conduct standards for women and men. Similarly, employers are not allowed to bow to customer preference in any other respect when it comes to gender in the workplace. For example, courts have held that airlines may not discriminate against men who want to be flight attendants, even if their customers would prefer to be served by women. And, employers may not discriminate against women for jobs in the C-suite, even if their clients would be more comfortable doing business with men. Laws prohibiting sex discrimination are intended to change these cultural stereotypes, not to further them. In the area of personal appearance, however, gender-based differences are allowed. And, because they are often upheld in the context of customer service positions like yours, it seems that part of the rationale has to do with customer expectations. Customers want to be served meals and drinks from employees who are well-groomed and look neat, and in our culture, that translates differently depending on whether the employee is male or female. Courts have upheld different grooming standards and dress codes for men and women, including the requirement that women wear -- and men not wear -- makeup. Different hair requirements and clothing requirements have also generally been found to be legal. In one case, a federal appeals court allowed a casino to require female employees to wear makeup, to tease or style their hair, and to wear stockings, requirements that seem clearly intended to make these employees appear more sexually attractive to customers. If a dress code or grooming requirement imposed a significant burden on one gender only, that might cross the legal line. For example, if men could wear any clothing they wanted, but women had to purchase uniforms at significant expense for the same job, a court might find this requirement to be discriminatory. Short of a heavily one-sided expense like this, however, different grooming codes for men and women are legal. Source: employment law firm
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|