FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
View Poll Results: Should we keep the Monarchy? | ||||||
Yes | 18 | 75.00% | ||||
|
||||||
No | 6 | 25.00% | ||||
|
||||||
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
25-01-2018, 06:22 AM | #26 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
..what I mean is, removing privilege by birth will not remove hopelessness by birth..the removal of one extreme will not prevent the opposite extreme existing...all it will do is to remove that much needed help the privilege and influence has brought..priveledge also brings opportunities to travel etc and to see and to understand, which is the positive of it...that seeing and that understanding ‘of far off worlds’ is brought back to us and then we act and funds are raised etc...
...Diana was a great example in that without the existence of the Royal family, she may have not even travelled to the places she did, let alone support and ambassador those charities that she did...she saw, she spoke, we listened, type thing...without that, yes there are still terrible birth wrongs in the world and always will be...but with their influence and works and their dedication, the Royals do make it all slightly less, I think...and every little etc.. Last edited by Ammi; 25-01-2018 at 06:26 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 06:29 AM | #27 | |||
|
||||
Queen of Walford
|
I would definitely vote to keep them
I actually really like the Royal Family.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 09:01 AM | #28 | ||
|
|||
-
|
I'm not just talking about extremes though Ammi; I'm talking about the average, normal citizen and the subliminal message that something like a Royal Family can place in the public mindset for normal people. The idea that one is "just normal", should have "normal aspirations", shouldn't strive "beyond their place", should be aware of and accept where they slot into a social hierarchy. I think that's damaging, to many people, and it's so subtle that I don't think many people even see it? It's also, in my opinion, a very deliberately constructed social message... They WANT people to "stay in their lane" and let the old families / old money get on with pulling the strings. It benefits absolutely no one but the aristocracy, in the long run.
In terms of bringing people together... Well. That assumes that everyone is into it, which isn't the case. Everyone isn't "everyone"... Some of us DON'T mourn the death, or celebrate the birth or marriage, of a Royal any more than any other of the millions of random families in Britain. In fact, I find it sort of miserable that we celebrate the birth of Little George more than we do the birth of a baby two doors down. That we mourn the death of the Queen mother like it's some huge national incident when old ladies her age die literally every hour without mention. That the nation screeched and wailed over Diana when - despite her doing some good things for charity - there are people who do FAR more for the world than she ever did who die without so much as a mention in the local paper. That's a problem to me. The idea that it's good for us to "look up" for inspiration, instead of bothering to look around us. Especially when the inspiration that's "up there" is mostly duty-driven. Fake, hollow plastic window dressing. Last edited by Toy Soldier; 25-01-2018 at 09:02 AM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 09:51 AM | #29 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I'd keep it.
Inherited privilege and wealth will always exist, because people want to look after their own children most, and are unlikely to vote for a system that made everyone start from scratch (or an even base). I'm always amazed at the number of celebrities and TV presenters etc. that have famous parents. It's a big advantage. Even if it was completely meritocratic, the ones who had the best genes - eg. for intelligence - would have the advantage. That's as much an accident of birth as anything else. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 09:56 AM | #30 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Quote:
My mind isn't changed as to my supporting a Monarchy. However you outline some very strong,valid and thought provoking elements to this topic. Well presented by you, good one. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 09:59 AM | #31 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I would vote to keep. I dont look up to them nor do i know anyone that does. They bring an awful lots of tourism to our country, do a lot for charities here and abroad and also keep a link with other countries that we may not have had or kept.
__________________
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 10:08 AM | #32 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Quote:
Maybe 100 years ago. The days when a Duchess could go down the the East End in a big hat and the locals would come out tugging their collective forelocks is well and truly over. That's a very dated view of the British, in my opinion. I had the privilege to work with the Prince's Trust when I left uni, and it really does change the lives of young people. I don't think Charlie gets nearly enough credit for that. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 10:11 AM | #33 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:10 AM | #34 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Only because these days people don't have to bother leaving their homes to do it... they can just sit at home and wank at their telly.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:14 AM | #35 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:18 AM | #36 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
Quote:
What good do they do? And if you are going to say tourism then quantify it against what they cost and what we would gain from property and land sale? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:33 AM | #37 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
As for being supposed to gush over how much they do for charity... I'm sorry but it would be absolutely bloody abhorrent if they WEREN'T using their completely unearned position of wealth and privilege to help others. They know this very well, and while I'm sure they do naturally get some personal "good feels" from it, it'd take a lot to convince me that it isn't mostly just a huge PR exercise because they know that this good image is part of what keeps them around when most of the world has long moved past the concept of genetic succession. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:47 AM | #38 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Quote:
The royal family has moved on. Sadly, wannabe republicans have not. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:48 AM | #39 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Quote:
Who's gushing? The only one using colourful language and suggesting people are wanking at their telly... is you. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:49 AM | #40 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:52 AM | #41 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I think its human nature for a lot of people to have a fundamental need to look up to and admire someone we consider honorable or flawless or admirable. I for example greatly admire Diana's sons because I think they've done an enormous amount of public good. I look up to Kate as flawless and graceful and I remember princess Diana as turbulent but intriguing. I don't think my admiration is unhealthy. I don't aspire to be like them. I'm just charmed by them and would hate to see them gone. That said, I think there are far too many royal hangers-on. The extended royal family imo shouldn't be getting all these royal privileges.
__________________
No longer on this site. Last edited by DemolitionRed; 25-01-2018 at 11:53 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:55 AM | #42 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
Quote:
What i am asking is what is the cost benefit of abolishing and selling the assets. Every evil empire creates jobs as well as good ones. I wonder how much we could raise via Purple Bricks if we sold this lot? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...yal_residences I expect we could sort out the NHS, the Elderly Care system and the homeless and still have tons left over for Sweets and a new PS4? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:55 AM | #43 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Quote:
I agree with all of that. The last line is particularly pertinent, there should be a cull of the 'minor' royals. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 11:57 AM | #44 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 12:03 PM | #45 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/pe...-10491277.html
even Visit Britain have no figure for this "boost" to the economy via tourism #oldwivestale |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 12:06 PM | #46 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
and lets not even start about why at the "head" of the country we have people who become rich and powerful due to who their parents are rather than through hard work and endeavour..
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 12:08 PM | #47 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
You could say that about anyone with a few bob. Nepotism isn't confined to the royals. How many "celebrity dynasties" do we have? All hugely admired and fawned over... for acting, or singing, or something equally overvalued.
Last edited by Livia; 25-01-2018 at 12:09 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 12:41 PM | #48 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
Quote:
Look what it did to Diana ffs. Did we really learn nothing? She was adored as an unrealistic avatar of flawlessness and grace and the pressure of that image made her hugely unhappy... I think she would be spinning circles in her grave looking at the images of William, Kate and their children splashed all over the tabloids. She would surely be hugely worried for them, as she always was for herself and her boys. They are flawed. All people are flawed. And believing otherwise, believing that there is such a thing as a flawless or "superior" type of human, is really detrimental to the vast majority of people. It's hard to see that because it's been something we've been doing forever but it's a psychological mess. It's an unrealistic idea of what a human being actually is, and it contributes massively to people NOT accepting each other's flaws. And surely you can't argue that as a society, currently, we are generally accepting of each other's flaws? Last edited by Toy Soldier; 25-01-2018 at 12:51 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 12:50 PM | #49 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Quote:
Quote:
It's odd. Just odd. And it degrades and lessens the importance of the individual in countless seemingly minor but ultimately damaging ways. But meh. Maybe I've given it too much thought. Maybe society isn't actually a mess and shouldn't be questioned so hard... maybe people do "need" their human deities. If the cancer runs too deep it can sometimes be impossible to cut it out without killing the host, I suppose? Last edited by Toy Soldier; 25-01-2018 at 12:52 PM. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-01-2018, 01:31 PM | #50 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Last edited by Cherie; 25-01-2018 at 01:32 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|