[LeatherTrumpet]

This time she is suing a drone






https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-535221...edium=referral

[Oliver_W]

Mrs Mountbatten-Windsor is protective over her child? And doesn't want him photographed by strangers when they're in their own home?

What an awful woman!!!!

[Captain.Remy]

Her constantly feeding her lawyers firm with new cases
We love a Princess that supports the economy.

[Ammi]

...Queen of channelling her Rachel Zane....

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Mrs Mountbatten-Windsor is protective over her child? And doesn't want him photographed by strangers when they're in their own home?

What an awful woman!!!!

.

She's not actually suing a drone LT, is she? Also it's not "she" it's they, her and Harry. Can't imagine anyone would be happy about a drone flying on to their property to take pictures of their children though.......

[LukeB]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

.

She's not actually suing a drone LT, is she? Also it's not "she" it's they, her and Harry. Can't imagine anyone would be happy about a drone flying on to their property to take pictures of their children though.......

To me it seems quite creepy to take pics of children even if they are well known. It shouldn’t be allowed.

[Ammi]

...I think it’s creepy to want to photograph anyone, child/adult in the privacy of their home...unless specifically invited to...

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I think it’s creepy to want to photograph anyone, child/adult in their privacy of their home...unless specifically invited to...

And also illegal in California but LT thinks these perps should get away with it because .................Meghan Markle

[AnnieK]

Yep, no matter what you think of Meghan, I honestly can't see how anyone can defend paparazzi thinking its ok to fly drones or helicopters over anyone's house to take photos of very young children. Its creepy and pretty sinister really. And then to use the fact that Meghan AND Harry are pissed off about that to try and make it out to be diva behaviour.

Kate did exactly the same thing when her privacy was breached when they took pics of her sunbathing in France and was awarded damages for those pictures

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

And also illegal in California but LT thinks these perps should get away with it because .................Meghan Markle

...if only Diana had taken more legal action over the invasions of privacy taken by the paparazzi, maybe she would still be alive...

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

.

She's not actually suing a drone LT, is she? Also it's not "she" it's they, her and Harry. Can't imagine anyone would be happy about a drone flying on to their property to take pictures of their children though.......

Ikr all I ever hear is " she " "Meghan did this " and "Meghan did that " blah blah

Anyone would think Meghan is the spawn of Satan who has Harry prisoner and has a hold of his tongue while controlling him . Even though it's quite clear Harry has a big input in all this .

But no it's easier to blame Meghan and pick on her . They're a couple and a family and they make decisions together .

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...if only Diana had taken more legal action over the invasions of privacy taken by the paparazzi, maybe she would still be alive...

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Ikr all I ever hear is " she " "Meghan did this " and "Meghan did that " blah blah

Anyone would think Meghan is the spawn of Satan who has Harry prisoner and has a hold of his tongue while controlling him . Even though it's quite clear Harry has a big input in all this .

But no it's easier to blame Meghan and pick on her . They're a couple and a family and they make decisions together .

I know and Meghan gets all the blame when it must really hit a nerve with Harry, he lost his own mother at such a young age, he has to be thinking about his own son here and comparing it to his own situation as a child

[Cherie]

The irony about it is Royal kids are protected in the UK from this type of invasion of privacy, not looking too well thought out this getting away from the evil UK press now is it

[GoldHeart]

Oh 100% I think the treatment of Diana has definitely had a huge impact on Harry , losing his mother at such a young age and how she died aswell was a horrible outcome. And it's obvious Harry wants to protect Meghan & his son .

Invasion of privacy is unacceptable , the paparazzi are creeps with no boundaries . Celebrity or not this is too much and I'm glad they're taking legal action .

[Liam-]

Queen of litigation

[joeysteele]

Well if I had children, I wouldn't want or accept anyone sending drones over to spy on them.
Especially as a baby.

Sounds pretty sick and desperate to me that.
Hardly necessary or newsworthy.

[Ammi]

..get that mask awareness in, bots.....

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

i think it's your imagination

[Livia]

Who cares? They're just plain old celebrities now. Deal with it.

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by Livia

Who cares? They're just plain old celebrities now. Deal with it.

I think that's what they are doing by suing

Royal, Celebrity or normal person, you have the right to privacy in your own home and to not expect the safety of your child to be compromised by unauthorised photographs being taken.

[The Slim Reaper]

Annie selling her authorised baby photo rights to hello, then fighting for Megan's rights to do the same. You love to see it.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

I think that's what they are doing by suing

Royal, Celebrity or normal person, you have the right to privacy in your own home and to not expect the safety of your child to be compromised by unauthorised photographs being taken.

Absolutely right Annie..

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Well if I had children, I wouldn't want or accept anyone sending drones over to spy on them.
Especially as a baby.

Sounds pretty sick and desperate to me that.
Hardly necessary or newsworthy.

Exactly, what parent would be OK with that?

[Swan]

Sad thing is, watch in 6 months when they make a deal (for a huge sum) with OK for pictures of their kid to be plastered all over the rag.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Cherie

The irony about it is Royal kids are protected in the UK from this type of invasion of privacy, not looking too well thought out this getting away from the evil UK press now is it

Yup...there are no drones or helicopters flying over Royal residences doing this sort of thing...