FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Closed Thread |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24-07-2020, 09:11 AM | #1 | |||
|
||||
You know my methods
|
|
|||
24-07-2020, 09:15 AM | #2 | |||
|
||||
POW! BLAM!
|
Mrs Mountbatten-Windsor is protective over her child? And doesn't want him photographed by strangers when they're in their own home?
What an awful woman!!!! |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:16 AM | #3 | ||
|
|||
Nah
|
Her constantly feeding her lawyers firm with new cases
We love a Princess that supports the economy.
__________________
|
||
24-07-2020, 09:21 AM | #4 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...Queen of channelling her Rachel Zane....
|
|||
24-07-2020, 09:23 AM | #5 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
She's not actually suing a drone LT, is she? Also it's not "she" it's they, her and Harry. Can't imagine anyone would be happy about a drone flying on to their property to take pictures of their children though.......
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:29 AM | #6 | |||
|
||||
Life imitates art
|
To me it seems quite creepy to take pics of children even if they are well known. It shouldn’t be allowed.
__________________
Spoiler: Last edited by LukeB; 24-07-2020 at 09:30 AM. |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:32 AM | #7 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...I think it’s creepy to want to photograph anyone, child/adult in the privacy of their home...unless specifically invited to...
Last edited by Ammi; 24-07-2020 at 09:36 AM. |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:35 AM | #8 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
And also illegal in California but LT thinks these perps should get away with it because .................Meghan Markle
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:40 AM | #9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yep, no matter what you think of Meghan, I honestly can't see how anyone can defend paparazzi thinking its ok to fly drones or helicopters over anyone's house to take photos of very young children. Its creepy and pretty sinister really. And then to use the fact that Meghan AND Harry are pissed off about that to try and make it out to be diva behaviour.
Kate did exactly the same thing when her privacy was breached when they took pics of her sunbathing in France and was awarded damages for those pictures
__________________
Last edited by AnnieK; 24-07-2020 at 09:43 AM. |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:41 AM | #10 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
|
|||
24-07-2020, 09:41 AM | #11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Anyone would think Meghan is the spawn of Satan who has Harry prisoner and has a hold of his tongue while controlling him . Even though it's quite clear Harry has a big input in all this . But no it's easier to blame Meghan and pick on her . They're a couple and a family and they make decisions together . |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:44 AM | #12 | |||
|
||||
I Love my brick
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:45 AM | #13 | |||
|
||||
This Witch doesn't burn
|
The irony about it is Royal kids are protected in the UK from this type of invasion of privacy, not looking too well thought out this getting away from the evil UK press now is it
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' |
|||
24-07-2020, 09:54 AM | #14 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Oh 100% I think the treatment of Diana has definitely had a huge impact on Harry , losing his mother at such a young age and how she died aswell was a horrible outcome. And it's obvious Harry wants to protect Meghan & his son .
Invasion of privacy is unacceptable , the paparazzi are creeps with no boundaries . Celebrity or not this is too much and I'm glad they're taking legal action . Last edited by GoldHeart; 24-07-2020 at 09:54 AM. |
|||
24-07-2020, 10:04 AM | #16 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
Well if I had children, I wouldn't want or accept anyone sending drones over to spy on them.
Especially as a baby. Sounds pretty sick and desperate to me that. Hardly necessary or newsworthy. |
||
24-07-2020, 10:07 AM | #17 | |||
|
||||
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
..get that mask awareness in, bots.....
|
|||
24-07-2020, 10:09 AM | #19 | |||
|
||||
שטח זה להשכרה
|
Who cares? They're just plain old celebrities now. Deal with it.
|
|||
24-07-2020, 10:26 AM | #20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I think that's what they are doing by suing
Royal, Celebrity or normal person, you have the right to privacy in your own home and to not expect the safety of your child to be compromised by unauthorised photographs being taken.
__________________
|
|||
24-07-2020, 10:46 AM | #21 | |||
|
||||
Oh no, I'm English
|
Annie selling her authorised baby photo rights to hello, then fighting for Megan's rights to do the same. You love to see it.
__________________
|
|||
24-07-2020, 11:12 AM | #24 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Sad thing is, watch in 6 months when they make a deal (for a huge sum) with OK for pictures of their kid to be plastered all over the rag.
__________________
|
|||
24-07-2020, 11:13 AM | #25 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Yup...there are no drones or helicopters flying over Royal residences doing this sort of thing... |
|||
Closed Thread |
|
|