[arista]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

He accused them of being Paedophiles.

He should be in a lot of trouble imo.

But they called him a Racist.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

Putting his views
on this Case and his Political Stance
ideal guest

We already know it. He has nothing to offer on pretty much anything, other than how to write songs like a 14yr old grade 7 music student.

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

We already know it. He has nothing to offer on pretty much anything, other than how to write songs like a 14yr old grade 7 music student.

No as
he has a New Political group.


He did OK on the Live on Ch5HD AM show

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by DouglasS

This crystal just seems butt hurt and a massive attention seeker tbh

Swan is clearly saying that probably hundreds of people a day on Twitter are accused of things or called a paedo when they are not as an insult. All these hundreds of people just ignore it and block it, or laugh it off...

Since when has the nation Been filled with baby snowflakes that cry at any insult (even if it is defamation) and go to the law/civil case

Being called a Paedophile doesn't make her a snowflake imo.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by arista

No as
he has a New Political group.


He did OK on the Live on Ch5HD AM show

And his political group is exactly the same as his twitter feed.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by arista

But they called him a Racist.

Calling someone a racist doesn't justify falsely accusing someone else of molesting children.

This is kind of basic stuff here, people.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Liam-

He’s a twat, I just wish people would stop giving him the attention he craves, if people stopped reacting to him, he’s get bored and move on to release even more **** music in the shadows

It's all these attention seeking drag queenies giving him it..


Pour them all in a pot if **** and hurl it down the river.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Calling someone a racist doesn't justify falsely accusing someone else of molesting children.

This is kind of basic stuff here, people.

Yes it does

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by arista

But they called him a Racist.

It's not the same as falsely being accused of sexually molesting kids.

[The Slim Reaper]

You ok, Parm?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Yes it does

Wrong, again.

You can believe someone is a racist, but you can't falsely accuse them of a crime, especially something like peadophillia. This is basic morality, basic law and ethics.

A homophobic mind that equates homosexuality to paedophilia might think it's acceptable but people with a sense of decency will tell you otherwise.

[parmnion]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Wrong, again.

You can believe someone is a racist, but you can't falsely accuse them of a crime, especially something like peadophillia. This is basic morality, basic law and ethics.

A homophobic mind that equates homosexuality to paedophilia might think it's acceptable but people with a sense of decency will tell you otherwise.

What about calling someone a racist, like what happened here before he retorted with the paedophile accusation.

[parmnion]

And is a paedophile who only thinks about it, committing a crime?

[LeatherTrumpet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Calling someone a racist doesn't justify falsely accusing someone else of molesting children.

This is kind of basic stuff here, people.

I am sure that you called Donald Trump a paedo many times on this forum and he has to this day not been convicted of any offence of that manor

basic stuff indeed

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by parmnion

What about calling someone a racist, like what happened here before he retorted with the paedophile accusation.

It's not something you can argue against. Saying 'I think you're a racist because of the opinions you've shared' is not the same as 'I'm going to brand you a peadophile because I don't like you.'

The former is an opinion, the latter is libel/slander. Spend less time defending homophobes that make a habit of branding people peadophiles because of their sexuality.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I am sure that you called Donald Trump a paedo many times on this forum and he has to this day not been convicted of any offence of that manor

basic stuff indeed

Except that Donald Trump has a long list of accusations against him, some of which were from underage victims, that and the fact he was a friend of Epstein too.... Of course, you know this already and are choosing to ignore this to try to score points but as always, your points get rubbished because choosing to ignore evidence you dislike doesn't make it go away. Basic stuff indeed.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I am sure that you called Donald Trump a paedo many times on this forum and he has to this day not been convicted of any offence of that manor

basic stuff indeed

Continue to defend Trump all you like , but he was thick as thieves with Epstein just like Prince Andrew was . They were definitely involved in it.

He also has a list of accusations by victims in general as Dezzy mentioned . Plus we've heard how he talks about about women, the sheer disrespect.

Plus he more or less said he'd date his own daughter if he could , he's a weirdo ! .

[Ammi]

...I just had to recap on this story for the context...when Laurence Fox encouraged a boycott of Sainsbury’s on Twitter, because of their support for Black History Month...there were apparently many responses suggestive of a racist mindset in his words...but Crystal was the only one who had ‘pedophile’ levelled at her from him...that’s surely the definition of prejudice when what he said was only levelled at Crystal amongst other comments of his racist mindset...

[Toy Soldier]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I just had to recap on this story for the context...when Laurence Fox encouraged a boycott of Sainsbury’s on Twitter, because of their support for Black History Month...there were apparently many responses suggestive of a racist mindset in his words...but Crystal was the only one who had ‘pedophile’ levelled at her from him...that’s surely the definition of prejudice when what he said was only levelled at Crystal amongst other comments of his racist mindset...

I agree - a LOT of people have been calling him racist, and he chose to call a gay man who is famous for being a drag queen a paedophile, not the countless others. I think people are quick to overlook the implications there. Even giving him the benefit of the doubt, that he doesn't realise the implications (which is unlikely, IMO... he knew fine well) the absolute BEST you could say is that he's staggeringly ignorant.

[DouglasS]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I am sure that you called Donald Trump a paedo many times on this forum and he has to this day not been convicted of any offence of that manor

basic stuff indeed

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It's all these attention seeking drag queenies giving him it..


Pour them all in a pot if **** and hurl it down the river.

Originally Posted by parmnion

Yes it does

Originally Posted by parmnion

What about calling someone a racist, like what happened here before he retorted with the paedophile accusation.

Originally Posted by parmnion

And is a paedophile who only thinks about it, committing a crime?

[arista]

Originally Posted by UserSince2005

he's so ****ing hot

Spoiler:

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by DouglasS

Imagine clapping a post I already shredded.

[DouglasS]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Imagine clapping a post I already shredded.

Shredded?

That must be your own interpretation of your own post.

I just see LT pointing out double standards and a collapse of your justifications earlier in the thread

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by DouglasS

Shredded?

That must be your own interpretation of your own post.

I just see LT pointing out double standards and a collapse of your justifications earlier in the thread

Then, like him, you're choosing to ignore facts just to try and fail to get one over on me which is just really sad. Ignoring a fact doesn't make it go away, delusion doesn't overcome reality.

Donald Trump has a list of sexual assault accusations against him, some of which are from people who were underage at the time. That's a fact that there's accusations. There has been no such accusation for the people this failed actor has branded peadophiles for, just because of their sexuality. Baseless accusations are libel/slander, calling someone a racist in response to them posting racist views is not.

Of course, you're entitled to be wrong, you certainly like to make use of that right. You can make believe all you want, but you can't disregard the facts.